Baldwin supporters push too hard, confuse everyone

[A. Havnes]

It's a disappointment that Barr didn't show up, but I can understand if he had other commitments. I like Baldwin simply because he seems to be more of a Constitutionalist than the other candidates.

 

[Jeremy]

It's a disappointment that Barr didn't show up, but I can understand if he had other commitments. I like Baldwin simply because he seems to be more of a Constitutionalist than the other candidates.

This thread isn't an attack on Baldwin. It's more of an attack on the anti-Barr people who don't know all the details and are confusing everyone.

 

[Kilrain]

Classic case of "little guy picking on smaller guy", because it's easier than getting together and taking out the big bully on the block, methinks.

 

[speciallyblend]

This thread isn't an attack on Baldwin. It's more of an attack on the anti-Barr people who don't know all the details and are confusing everyone.

umm no one is confusing anything everyone knows exactly what happened barr no showed and has no logical explanation other then himself. barr is full of sh__

what you should be doing is calling barr and the lp and do some major ass kissing oo i meant they better do some major ass kissing and the only ass kissing i will take is BARR STEPPING DOWN AND RON PAUL being the lp nominee ,barr is a lost cause ,he lost me on other issues but his actions today well made my decision easier

 

[CasualApathy]

This thread isn't an attack on Baldwin. It's more of an attack on the anti-Barr people who don't know all the details and are confusing everyone.

Don, who is there and works for the CFL has already posted that Barr didn't show because he "didn't think it was worth it".

I rest my freakin' case, your honor.

 

[Jeremy]

Yet you people still spend all your energy dissing a guy who won't win over promoting Lawson's moneybomb?

 

[CasualApathy]

Yet you people still spend all your energy dissing a guy who won't win over promoting Lawson's moneybomb?

Nice way to duck the issue.

 

[Jeremy]

Nice way to duck the issue.

What are you talking about? Did you even read this thread? Read the OP...

 

[LibertyEagle]

Austin Peterson is a good guy and was a big help when he was here in NYC as a Ron Paul supporter in the Meetup. Sucks that Jesse Benton went neanderthal on him.

I wholeheartedly agree. Benton needs to chill out on his goon behavior. He did this same kind of crap during the campaign with reporters.

Austin is a big Ron Paul supporter.

 

[CasualApathy]

What are you talking about? Did you even read this thread? Read the OP...

Yea yea - you don't support anyone I get it, that's your cover story.

If you can't even make up your mind to support someone you should probably not tell others who to support. Even writing in your own name is better then supporting noone.

 

[Jeremy]

Yea yea - you don't support anyone I get it, that's your cover story.

If you can't even make up your mind to support someone you should probably not tell others who to support. Even writing in your own name is better then supporting noone.

I was referring to the fast that I was talking about Lawson from the beginning :o

Actually, a few may have not seen it because I edited the post a couple seconds after I posted it since I forgot to say something about the moneybomb

 

[BenMuldowney]

This thread isn't an attack on Baldwin. It's more of an attack on the anti-Barr people who don't know all the details and are confusing everyone.

this is the final straw for Barr. how the LP handles this party dilemma determines how aggressive we should be in exposing Barr's disinfo antics.

 

[CasualApathy]

And this is what I was responding to:

... I'm not a supporter of anyone ... But I saw someone say they're going for Nader now. You've got to be kidding me. You'd rather vote for a socialist then someone who didn't show up at a Ron Paul event because someone from the LP already planned something for him? You people are pricks ...

You say you don't support anyone - which tells me that yours is a wasted opinion - yet you have the gall to attack people supporting a 3rd party candidate.

Besides as i have already posted, your reason for Barr not showing up has been proven wrong, unless you want to call Don a liar...

 

[Jeremy]

And this is what I was responding to.



You say you don't support anyone - which tells me that yours is a wasted opinion - yet you have the gall to attack people supporting a 3rd party candidate.

I'm attacking people for attacking other people, not for supporting someone.

OK, I briefly attacked Nader

 

[CasualApathy]

I'm attacking people for attacking other people, not for supporting someone.

OK, I briefly attacked Nader

^^ NWO Shill

 

[Bradley in DC]

If you have Barr and Nader there's no reason to vote for Nader unless you're a socialist.

I voted for Nader last time.

 

[Jeremy]

But srsly, sign up for the moneybomb or I'll call you names again =)