Patrick(Austin)
Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2007
- Messages
- 4
I will be the started to setup are groups thread here.


I'm sorry to have to contradict you on copyright (btw, it's right, not write, as in someone having "rights" to their work) laws. The "fair use" part of the law only applies to brief snippets for reviewing or similar purposes.
As to non-commercial use, that is a gray area, but the law does generally come down on the side of those who own the copyrights. Why do you think there has been such a to-do over P2P sites? Whether DJs or their listeners have been doing it for years or not has no bearing on the law.
And yes, in general, for purely personal purposes, it might be possible to get away with using a commercial song on a personal website or for some other non-commercial purpose. But don't count on it. For example, I once tried to get rights to use some music in a video that was NOT going to be sold, but GIVEN as a gift to some families who had lost loved ones in a tragic way. Permission was refused.
Therefore, please don't dispense legal advice here. IF anyone wants to use commercial music to promote Ron Paul, I would really encourage you to please NOT do it if there is any question at all, at least not without getting professional legal advice and preferably a written legal opinion. We don't want to hurt the cause by doing anything questionable, particularly when we are promoting Dr. Paul's integrity.
There were a couple of lawyers at the meeting Friday night. Although copyright law is a speciality unto itself, perhaps one of them might nevertheless be able and willing to at least look into this.
Sigh. All right, once more, but I don't have time to continue this endlessly.
For those who are interested, read below for information from YouTube's own section on copyright violations. Click the link to read the rest of it (by the way, it is also a violation of the "fair use" premise to copy/paste entire sections of copyrighted material). The point here is not to continue to engage in pointless argument but to educate, to present facts, and to encourage the exercise of utmost caution in any gray moral or legal area. The last thing we need to do is provide a target for those who would hurt Ron Paul or his campaign. We don't need to be seeing YouTube's red message "This video has been removed due to terms of use violation" on content promoting Ron Paul.
From YouTube:
"A Few Guiding Principles
* It doesn't matter how long or short the clip is, or exactly how it got to YouTube. If you taped it off cable, videotaped your TV screen, or downloaded it from some other website, it is still copyrighted, and requires the copyright owner's permission to distribute.
* It doesn't matter whether or not you give credit to the owner/author/songwriter—it is still copyrighted.
* It doesn't matter that you are not selling the video for money—it is still copyrighted.
* It doesn't matter whether or not the video contains a copyright notice—it is still copyrighted.
* It doesn't matter whether other similar videos appear on our site—it is still copyrighted.
* It doesn't matter if you created a video made of short clips of copyrighted content—even though you edited it together, the content is still copyrighted.
What Will Happen If You Upload Infringing Content
Anytime we become aware that a video or any part of a video on our site infringes the copyrights of a third party, we will take it down from the site. We are required to do so by law. If you believe that a video on the site infringes your copyright, send us a copyright notice and we will take it down. If you believe that we have removed a video that you uploaded in error and that you are the copyright owner or have permission, you can file a counter notice and let us know. If you repeatedly post infringing content, your account will be terminated. This is also a requirement of the law."
http://www.youtube.com/t/howto_copyright