AUDIT THE FED hearing to be broadcast live

Mr. Garrett of NJ up for questions.

GARRETT: "re: monetary policy, this legislation is concerning. e.g., disclosure requirement. You're concerned about info being released to soon, but an audit takes a long time."

A: "The problem is the audit would be an intrusion into our monetary policy. Second guessing, judgement about if we are moving into the right direction.

Q: But don't congress already have that authority to second guess the FED?

A: But the GAO is more intrusive in their reviewing process. They will make a more comprehensive evaluation. It gives it a different kind of weight?

Q: So you're saying congress can make a judgement because we have inadequate info and don't know what we are talking about, but when GAO does it, they are doing it with good info, and so you're worried?
 
Funny that Cleaver said the people in his district don't know what the Fed does. Cleaver himself needs a little education.

Nice job dropping them knowledge bombs, BRUTHA!!!
 
Q: Will email, minutes, etc... be available to historians?

A: Depends on the type of info.

Q: Any info deliberately destroyed?

A: Only info the archivalist agrees we can destroy.
 
I can't believe that the Fed guy said that a possible reprecussion could be raised interest rates...a hollow threat to those who don't understand that that's actually a good thing.
 
FED: "People are not smart enough to figure out when a company is healthy or compromised when they borrow from us so therefor we don't disclose that information."
 
do you notice how all the lying bastards, including this guy bernake, geithner etcetc, start out there answers with...

"So, ..."


I hate that for some reason.
 
Back
Top