It is THEIR site. It is one of many ronpaul sites that do this type of thing. I have one which is going to be changed over from /bachmann2012/. I worked with DAS on this project before Orenbus rolled around. It's DAS's site, and Orenbus is helping him. I don't know what the big deal is there to argue whose site it is. I will say that hyping the site is an important part of getting the site popular. I asked you a question, and you didn't answer that. Look at the features of the other sites - most notably
http://ronpaulsocialnetwork.com and
http://rp2012.org (the "volunteer" section is a bit hidden in rp2012.org), and you will become more aware of what else is out there. Because there are at least 2 out other ones out there, one of which was up in running in May, you might get an idea why all activity and attention is not focused on "country". I'm not criticizing country, but since I was working with DAS on this a little bit before Orenbus got on board, I think I do have a bit of insight there.
He's using Drupal, which (although others may disagree for any number of very good reasons) is roughly comparable with Joomla, which I prefer. It should be relatively easy to pick an off the shelf solution with Drupal that will fit the needs. I'm not at all concerned that it would be difficult to do that.
Any time you have a website that can do the job (and Country can either do the job, or could be made to do the job easily enough) and you have a project to do, and people to hype the project and the website, there's a pretty good chance that you'll have at least some success. This is Ron Paul we're talking about, so it's not like people who are using the internet don't care. That's not the hard part.
I'm not confused about what Country is. If it's "a tool to allow Ron Paul supporters to coordinate on a local level", more of those features really should be rolled out. I've been watching it. Every time I look at it, it seems that more and more features are rolled out. Good features. But, actually, at this point, it's lacking in features that allow RP supporters to coordinate. Because all you can do, today (and tomorrow might be different) is send an system email to other users you identify as being local to you. When they roll out the friends / groups capability, coordination will be easier. both socialnetwork and rp2012.org have all those features already. Not being critical. Initially, all DAS wanted to do was get people on board, and then hit them with a message when it was time for them to do something. The localizing features were a big part of it. He wanted to be able to hit different geographical areas with different, timely and important messages.
It's not THEIR site. They gain no personal benefit from it (and they invested a lot of hard work, time and money in creating it as well). The site is a war room for the grassroots.
RonPaulCountry isn't really a site to spend a lot of time on. You are confusing it with RPF and DailyPaul, which are more of a community. RonPaulCountry is more like a tool to allow Ron Paul supporters to coordinate on a local level. It is a calendar for events. It serves as an organisational resource principally, not a social network. I feel you are missing the point.