Attention Media and GOP: "No one but Paul" POLL ADDED

[KEEF]

No one but Paul!!! Same as 08'

 

[acptulsa]

"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
~Samuel Adams

Wonder what it would take to get a certain brewery to add this to their beer labels? 'Cause it would sure look good there.

 

[Steve Teters]

Want to really scare the Repubs? If not Paul, vote Obammer, and tell them so.

 

[KEEF]

No One But Paul.

(Fact is, the establishment GOP I feel are saying Anyone But Paul, they would take Obama for another four years than see their precious military industrial complex destroyed.)

You hit the nail on the head with that one!

 

[Athan]

Paul or BUST.

 

[acptulsa]

Want to really scare the Repubs? If not Paul, vote Obammer, and tell them so.

I'm not voting for that idiot. We don't have to. All of the independents and Democrats we're winning over to the ideals of real, pure conservatism (and, yes, I realize this describes many of the people in this thread) simply will not support a false, unprincipled conservative. Won't happen. If they're going to give conservatism and traditional American principles a fresh try, they're only going to go for the real thing. Period.

And for a decades-long record of supporting this and nothing else, well, such a thing can be claimed by no one but Ron Paul.

(Fact is, the establishment GOP I feel are saying Anyone But Paul, they would take Obama for another four years than see their precious military industrial complex destroyed.)

Ah, if only we could trick them into saying this out loud, the vast majority of the rank and file G.O.P. vote would be ours and ours alone.

 

[Karsten]

Ron Paul or 3rd party. Just like last time.

I wrote in Ron Paul in the general election in 2008 and I hope I don't have to again next year. We simply didn't have good 3rd party choices. I simply couldn't see myself voting for fake Paul-hating Barr, or theo-con Chuck Baldwin, or socialst Ralph Nader.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Wonder what it would take to get a certain brewery to add this to their beer labels? 'Cause it would sure look good there.

That would be epic.

 

[Karsten]

I wrote in Ron Paul in the general election in 2008 and I hope I don't have to again next year. We simply didn't have good 3rd party choices. I simply couldn't see myself voting for fake Paul-hating Barr, or theo-con Chuck Baldwin, or socialst Ralph Nader.

Not to mention that even if the 08 3rd party candidates were more philosophically sound, there was just wouldn't have generated the excitement that Ron Paul would have. I could imagine voting for a 3rd party candidate, but they would have to give me a reason for it.

 

[TheTexan]

No.




One.




But.




PAUL.

 

[Captain Shays]

Want to really scare the Repubs? If not Paul, vote Obammer, and tell them so.

We don't have to vote Obummer to get their attention. They will lose anyway unless they nominate Dr Paul. I for one couldn't violate my own conscience by casting my vote for Obummer any more than I could for one of the establishment candidates from the GOP. I firmly believe in my heart that this country is like a train that can only go where the tracks take it and no matter which of the establishment candidates becomes the next president no matter which party the train will continue on its present trajectory ONLY RON PAUL is the switch man who will actually change the direction back to the Constitutional principles we were founded upon, and not just the speed of which it gets to it's eventual destination.

This is why I say to me self every day..........

(((((NO ONE BUT PAUL)))))

 

[Captain Shays]

I wrote in Ron Paul in the general election in 2008 and I hope I don't have to again next year. We simply didn't have good 3rd party choices. I simply couldn't see myself voting for fake Paul-hating Barr, or theo-con Chuck Baldwin, or socialst Ralph Nader.

Ron Paul endorsed Chuck Baldwin and I am proud to have voted for him but in this election


((((((NO ONE BUT PAUL)))))

 

[Captain Shays]

nothing but freedom

nothing but prosperity

nothing but the constitution

no one but paul.

love it!!!

 

[georgiaboy]

Want to really scare the Repubs? If not Paul, vote Obammer, and tell them so.

Unless you really think Obama is your second choice, this is a bad idea. The GOP needs to see us register our disgust with their other RINO candidates by seeing where those votes went - write-in, Libertarian party, Constitution Party, etc.

Voting Obama just to ensure the R's lose will not register with the GOP establishment, because they'll see a vote for Obama as a vote for more socialism, not a protest vote.

Write-in, or a good third party, will register with the republicans as a protest vote. It showed bigtime in 2008, and the GOP has moved its message toward the tea party to try and grab that back. We're here to tell them that we can't be tricked by tea party rhetoric talked up but not acted on, ever, by big gov't RINOs.

N.O.B.P.

 

[bunklocoempire]

Ron Paul or third party. Can't write him in over here and still be counted.

That goes for three other voters in my family as well.



Bunkloco

 

[Karsten]

Ron Paul endorsed Chuck Baldwin and I am proud to have voted for him but in this election


((((((NO ONE BUT PAUL)))))

I know, but Baldwin was too much of a theocrat so I couldn't support him. He also seemed even more hawkish on immigration and I have much more libertarian ideas about that.

 

[kahless]

I picked "Ron or third party" but that only applies depending on the third party candidate. At this rate it looks like I would be writing in Ron Paul if he does not make it and if they allow write-in this time around.

 

[Travlyr]

President Ron Paul or NO Republican at all.

Talk radio hosts need to discuss Ron Paul and his ideas.

No One But Paul

 

[Cap]

I abhor voting for anyone but Dr. Paul, however I will vote for Obama if Dr. Paul does not get the nomination. Why you say? Because we then have a shot at electing Rand in 2016 and we will be guaranteed gridlock if Obammy gets re-elcted. If any of the other pubbies get the nomination, they will push through a NWO agenda and it will sail through congress. Gridlock is better than slavery.

 

[Captain Shays]

I abhor voting for anyone but Dr. Paul, however I will vote for Obama if Dr. Paul does not get the nomination. Why you say? Because we then have a shot at electing Rand in 2016 and we will be guaranteed gridlock if Obammy gets re-elcted. If any of the other pubbies get the nomination, they will push through a NWO agenda and it will sail through congress. Gridlock is better than slavery.

And you think Obama isn't pushing the NWO? Huh? THAT is what this is all about Bro. Pushing against the establishment candidates no matter what party. Unfortunately Obama is an establishment candidate from the Democrat side. All the others except for Ron Paul and Gary Johnson are as well.
But I won't vote for Gary. To me there is no other way around this. It's.......


(((((NO ONE BUT PAUL)))))