ATTACK ROMNEY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[tommyrp12]

THE BIG DIG ! http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?344112-the-BIG-DIG

 

[tommyrp12]

 

[jolynna]

I love Ron Paul and his message, but anyone who thinks that Ron Paul will attack the Romney Campaign is not thinking logically. I can't wait to see the convention and the total amount of delegates RP has, but this thing is all but done. The American people are too sheepish and dumb... they will be RUNNING to Romney's camp now.

Don't get me wrong, I am forking over even more for the 4/15 Money Bomb, but the Paul campaign doesn't have the balls to attack anyone now. They know its over.

No anti-unprovoked war or pro-liberty candidate should EVER stand by silently without PROTEST when the potential leader beats the drums for starting WWIII and says he supports stripping Americans of their liberties.

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

For Ron Paul to say nothing would be a nod of approval about what SHOULD MATTER MOST, according to everything Ron Paul has said or written. Whether he wins or loses the nomination, Ron Paul has to speak out against assaults on life and civil liberty.

In my opinion.

 

[PolicyReader]

This could be useful

 

[PolicyReader]

 

[J_White]

There is a thread in the so-called Campaign Suggestion Box about attacking Romney,
please make your views heard in that thread also - maybe the campaign will take some action on it.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?371378-ATTN-CAMPAIGN-Please-act-ASAP-to-draw-a-sharp-contrast-between-Mitt-and-Ron

 

[floridasun1983]

Honest question...
If RP's campaign is not attacking Romney, why do they need money? RP staying in the race does not require much money at all, as he is already on the ballots in all the states.
If this is a delegate strategy, most of that is coming from the grassroots now.

So, the campaign either needs to bring down the full weight of the Constitution upon Romney's Big Government Self via ads, or RP needs to simply thank his supporters...continue to go around the country talking/spreading the message, and put the money/efforts from grassroots to candidates elsewhere now.

That's the real question. If Ron doesn't attack Romeny now then we have to wonder if we've been strung along, because this is it.

 

[Paul Or Nothing II]

"And that's why presenting Ron Paul as the ONLY one that can beat Obama is what we MUST do,"

Or, attack Romney, pointing out all the things about Romney that make him not electable.

Romney is unelectable because ___________ .

Making Romney seem less electable doesn't necessarily make Ron more electable; but making Ron seem more electable would make him seem more electable!

I'm not saying, we shouldn't attack, I'm just saying that the PRIMARY FOCUS should be on bringing out Ron's better electability over others due to his appeal across the political spectrum because media has the mainstreamers brainwashed to think he's unelectable so if it's left uncountered then they'll continue to perceive him in the same light irrespective of how much Romney is attacked

Bottomline is most want Obama out, so tell them how Ron CAN beat Obama!

 

[jolynna]

Bottomline is most want Obama out, so tell them how Ron CAN beat Obama!

I think we've got to do BOTH!

Hillary didn't hesitate to point out that Obama wouldn't be the best person to answer a 2 a.m. call. Ron Paul shouldn't hesitate to point out his opponents shortcomings either.

Many don't like Romney,just because of a gut feeling, but they rationalize that because he seems like a weak person he won't be dangerous. Since the mainstream is saying Ron Paul has radical ideas and Romney comes across as bland and is only dissed because he is a flip-flopper (that doesn't sound very scary), the uncomfortable feelings people get from Romney's persona get pushed down and people vote for what they think is safe.

That Romney is bland/safe needs to be dispelled. He would be a scary and dangerous president, just like Obama, with his push for war and stripping American citizens of their liberties. Plus both Obama and Romney would prop up the TBTF banks in a heartbeat (http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-mon...5-romney-im-not-looking-to-break-up-big-banks) and debt would continue to pile up to the point of no return.

I think Ron Paul's PLUSES need to be pushed. Many don't know of Ron Paul's electability and that MOST EVERY economic expert agrees that Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate who grasps the desperation of the situation America faces. Or that he's the only one who HAS a viable plan to fix the mess we are in.

I think people can't get ENOUGH information. They need to know why it IS in their best interest to vote for Ron Paul because of what he wants to do. And, people also need to know of the bad consequences that come with their "other" choices.


In my opinion.

 

[Paul Or Nothing II]

I think we've got to do BOTH!

Hillary didn't hesitate to point out that Obama wouldn't be the best person to answer a 2 a.m. call. Ron Paul shouldn't hesitate to point out his opponents shortcomings either.

Many don't like Romney,just because of a gut feeling, but they rationalize that because he seems like a weak person he won't be dangerous. Since the mainstream is saying Ron Paul has radical ideas and Romney comes across as bland and is only dissed because he is a flip-flopper (that doesn't sound very scary), the uncomfortable feelings people get from Romney's persona get pushed down and people vote for what they think is safe.

That Romney is bland/safe needs to be dispelled. He would be a scary and dangerous president, just like Obama, with his push for war and stripping American citizens of their liberties. Plus both Obama and Romney would prop up the TBTF banks in a heartbeat (http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-mon...5-romney-im-not-looking-to-break-up-big-banks) and debt would continue to pile up to the point of no return.

I think Ron Paul's PLUSES need to be pushed. Many don't know of Ron Paul's electability and that MOST EVERY economic expert agrees that Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate who grasps the desperation of the situation America faces. Or that he's the only one who HAS a viable plan to fix the mess we are in.

I think people can't get ENOUGH information. They need to know why it IS in their best interest to vote for Ron Paul because of what he wants to do. And, people also need to know of the bad consequences that come with their "other" choices.


In my opinion.

Again, I don't have a problem with exposing Romney & pointing out how dangerous a president he'd be & how similar he's to Obama BUT the PRIORITY for us should be to dispel the "unelectability" myth that's been peddled against Ron Paul; we need to make him seem THE MOST ELECTABLE, the rest of the issues can be supplementary; if the voters see an electable conservative option then they'll jump ship & most will desert Romney anyway

We need to stop thinking like a Paul-supporter, & try to think about the general Primary voters & their thought-process, & ousting Obama IS their priority, no matter what!

 

[PaulSoHard]

Question: does anyone know what's going on with RevPAC these days?