Asylum Seekers Overwhelm Shelters In Portland, Maine

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,537
Asylum Seekers Overwhelm Shelters In Portland, Maine

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/asylum-seekers-overwhelm-shelters-portland-maine

Sunday, Jun 05, 2022 - 08:30 PM

Authored by Steven Kovac via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Facing an impending humanitarian crisis, Portland Family Shelters Director Mike Guthrie has a simple message to anyone who will listen, “We need help!”

Guthrie, a hands-on, frontline worker in the effort to feed, clothe, and house a continuous flow of foreign nationals arriving in Portland by airplane or bus from the U.S. southern border, told The Epoch Times, “Our family shelter facilities, our warming room, and even area hotel space is at capacity. We have maxed out our community resources.

“The time is coming when I’m going to have to look a dad in the face and tell him and his family that I don’t know where they’re going to sleep tonight.”

The Portland Family Shelter is a complex of four rented buildings in various states of renovation located in the heart of downtown.

Some of the structures are gradually being converted into small apartments where up to four families will share a single kitchen and bathroom.

All four buildings are overflowing their present capacity.

“The intake is greater and faster than we can process,” Guthrie said.

To accommodate the stream of new arrivals, the family shelter program has in recent months placed 309 families (1,091 people) in eight hotels located in five neighboring municipalities spread over three counties of southeastern Maine’s prime tourist and vacation region.

Those moves, with their attendant complications and problems, have resulted in some pushback from the local Mainers who fear their prized relaxed lifestyle may never be the same.

And they resent not having a voice in any of it.

“It’s just part of the state government’s plan to bring the slums to the suburbs,” said a Mainer from the resort and tourist community of Kennebunkport, a small town about 28 miles down the Atlantic coast from Portland.

“The United States cannot rescue Africa.”

Coming out of the Kennebunkport post office, long-time Mainers Virginia and Robert shared their opinions on what the locals see as the “invasion” of Maine by immigrants.

Virginia commented, “We have sympathy for the asylum seekers, but resources are over-extended and now it’s going beyond Portland.”

“Eventually, it’s going to impact our quality of life,” Robert said.

Pressures on Portland’s homeless shelter capacity last year inspired a York County community action group to obtain a federal grant to help house the city’s regular homeless population.

The plan included renting half a dozen large motels in a three-mile corridor in the heart of southeastern Maine’s Atlantic-shore tourist region.

Motels within walking distance of shopping opportunities were selected.

The motels close in the off-season, so it appeared to some people to be a win-win arrangement.

Included in the plan was the small, quiet, resort town of Wells, located about six miles from Kennebunkport.

Though the program sheltered hundreds of individuals from the brutal Maine winter, the resulting wave of never-before-seen vandalism, burglaries, and other property crimes in the commercial district forced the city of Wells to evict every tenant for violations of several municipal ordinances.

It is unclear where the evicted people were relocated.

Homeless Victimized and Intimidated

According to Captain Gerald Congdon of the Wells Police Department, the crimes were not committed by foreign asylum seekers, Wells residents, or by the many legitimate, disadvantaged, and debilitated people housed in the motel.

“The perpetrators arrested were mostly ‘couch-surfers’ spending time with homeless friends staying legally at the motel. However, the bulk of grant-qualified motel dwellers had drug problems,” Congdon said.

One small business operator, whose sweetshop was burglarized, told The Epoch Times, “The thieves were druggies in need of a fix. They came in through a window, stole the cash from the register, and took our digital scales.

“These people were brought in around Christmastime. It was like an invasion. We never had a crime at our store before they came in and ruined things.

“It’s not fair. We now think differently. They changed the whole landscape of how we do business. We don’t want to see them come back.”

Congdon told The Epoch Times, “There was shoplifting at the bigger chain stores and car break-ins going after loose change in the strip mall parking lot.

“A small bike shop was burglarized twice, losing thousands of dollars-worth of high-end bicycles—never happened to them in 42 years of business.

“Our officers spent a lot of time on disturbance calls and enforcing warrants. We made quite a few arrests and recovered some stolen property.

“The management of the area’s motels got tired of seeing us there. They were tired of their legitimate businesses being associated with crime.

“The nice tenants, many of whom are truly deserving of help, were being victimized and intimidated. They were afraid to call us.”

Congdon said his department was not consulted and was given no advance notice on the plan to bring hundreds of homeless people—including many known drug-addicts—into their city.

The City of Wells was not compensated for the additional hours of policing.

‘Feeder Sources’

On May 1, a hotel in the resort town of Old Orchard Beach, located about halfway between Portland and Kennebunkport, evicted all of its residents for a different reason.

This time, they were asylum seekers evicted in order to make room for the arrival of legally permitted temporary seasonal workers to lodge there.

These special visa-holders make up the majority of the workforce needed by the region’s thriving hospitality industry.

The asylum seekers were relocated to motels in three other southern Maine communities, according to Portland city officials.

In Portland, 500 single asylum seekers are housed in a municipal shelter separate from the family shelter, according to a spokesperson for the city. It too is at capacity.

Guthrie told The Epoch Times that city authorities have publicly notified what he calls “the feeder sources” at the southern border and in Washington D.C. about the immigration crisis unfolding in Portland.

The city administration asked Border Patrol, Health and Human Services, and participating non-profits to stop sending asylum seekers to Portland until sufficient resources become available to adequately care for them.

But the force of the city’s request was blunted when it announced immediately after the notification that it would not turn anybody away, acknowledged Guthrie.

Guthrie stated that the city asked Maine Gov. Janet Mills, a Democrat, to call out the National Guard to set up emergency shelters and feeding stations but has not yet received an answer.

On June 2, in remarks before the Portland Regional Chamber of Commerce, Mills committed the state to building a new emergency shelter in the city and said she was working to create additional housing for asylum seekers in the area.

She also spoke of the desirability of the in-migration as a source of labor to fill many existing job openings.

Speaking of the migrants, Mills said, “We need the workforce here. We want them to be available for work. Some of them come with incredible skills and experiences that we can employ.”

One long-time Maine resident, who visited the Portland Family Shelter to see the situation for himself, told The Epoch Times, “Mike Guthrie is like a man frantically trying to bail out a sinking rowboat, while his superiors continue to drill holes in it.”

During the month of May, the family shelter took in 79 families consisting of 262 individuals with no slowdown in sight, Guthrie said.

“220 people turned up in just 20 days. We’re trying to help anybody that comes to the door. Thus far, nobody coming to us has had to sleep outside but we can no longer guarantee shelter upon arrival,” he said.

“We need the state of Maine to step in and create safe places for these people. We need a facility to be created and run like a FEMA camp.

“Our legislators are talking about buying and renovating older apartments throughout the region that could house 140 families. That’s great in the long-term, but the problem is now!

“At the rate things are going, we’d have those places filled in two months. Then what?” Guthrie asked.

Portland’s pastors, church members, and its citizens have been stepping forward to do what they can.

“Local churches and those in Cumberland are offering space for people to sleep and some Portland residents have even opened up their homes,” Guthrie said.

Where Are the Asylum Seekers Coming From?

The vast majority of the new arrivals at the family shelter in Portland have come from Angola and the Congo in Africa, with some coming from Haiti in the Caribbean.

They make the arduous and often dangerous journey any way they can—largely on foot.

Guthrie told of a father and child who recently showed up at the shelter.

“The man said that his wife, the young child’s mother, died on the way. She was swept away while crossing a river.”

Guthrie explained that the route to Portland for most of the asylum seekers begins in chaos-torn western equatorial Africa.

“They cross the Atlantic to South America. They go up through South America and then north through Central America, ending up in northern Mexico, from which they cross the southern border into the United States.

“At that point, they present themselves to Border Patrol.

“A new arrival tells Border Patrol ‘I am here to seek asylum. If I go back home, I will be killed. I fear for my life.’ That’s the difference between an asylum seeker and an immigrant,” he said.

Those three short sentences guarantee a person’s admission for a lengthy stay in the United States as his or her claim is adjudicated.

Guthrie went on to explain, “After some additional questioning, the individual is issued minimal paperwork by immigration authorities and told they will be contacted about a formal hearing on their asylum plea. They are then turned over to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.”

Most are given cell phones.

Public servants with the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), and representatives of various American non-profit, philanthropic organizations, ask the asylum seekers where they want to go in the interior of the United States to await their asylum hearing.

For many, their answer is “Portland.”

“They are then put on buses or airplanes and sent on their way,” Guthrie said.

Why Portland?

Guthrie said that Portland is often recommended to people enroute to the United States by relatives who are already living in the city.

“Once they get here, the majority of the new arrivals want to stay in Portland. They tell their relatives and friends about us,” he said.

Jessica Grondin, the city’s director of communications and media, told The Epoch Times in a phone interview, “Portland is happy about and proud of our good reputation as a ‘Welcoming City.’ We presently have a large Somali population, as well as many Iraqis and Afghans who arrived here previously.”

Grondin said that several busloads of asylum seekers recently shipped off to Washington D.C. by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, ultimately made their way to Portland.

She stated that, along with the lack of housing, one of the biggest problems facing the city is a shortage of staff to care for the volume of new arrivals.

Guthrie said that the influx asylum seekers has exceeded the city’s ability to offer basic services.

“As we outgrow our past limits, we are being forced to prioritize what we are doing for these people. We are no longer able to help them connect with local immigration attorneys, nor help them learn English,” he said.

Effective May 7, a policy change took effect forbidding the shelter’s staff from assisting asylum seekers in finding an apartment.

“Instead, these folks, who are complete strangers to this community and speak no English, are being qualified for a state General Assistance housing voucher.

“They are given a sample lease, a rental form, and an explanation of the GA process, and are then sent out on their own to find a place to live,” Guthrie said.

While most of the new arrivals speak Portuguese, some speak French, Lingala, or another tribal language. Many are bilingual, but none speak English.

Weary of waiting around, some of the French-speakers asked to be sent to Quebec, but the strict Canadian rules concerning COVID-19 prevented them from entering, Guthrie stated.


Condition and Needs of Asylum Seekers

Guthrie described the migrants’ situation, saying, “Understand, the majority of these people arrive here with no money. They spent their life savings during their trip and have to start over. They need everything.

“They come from hot climates wearing summer clothes. We have given away about 97 percent of our clothing stock to help them cope with the colder weather here in Maine.

“We have to keep many people outside during the day and then pack them into our warming room for the chilly Maine nights, or on rainy days,” he said.

Fathers, mothers, and their numerous small children are kept outside all day long. They stand on the sidewalk across the street from the shelter or sit in an alley between two old houses passing the time until the next meal.

The grimy concrete and stony gravel of the alley serve as furniture. There are no chairs or tables. They sit or recline on whatever is at hand, or on the bare dirt.

The shade formed by the receding shadow of the walls of the surrounding old buildings is their only comfort.

Antsy and bored small children have no toys with which to amuse themselves, except for one little boy who rides a plastic big-wheel tricycle around the alley.

A small bathroom is available to people upon request in one of the shelter’s buildings, or at a nearby city-owned singles’ shelter around the block.

“For showers, we team up with a local church that comes by with a bus and offers showers to any of them that want to go,” Guthrie said.

When asked if the asylum seekers are Christians, Guthrie answered that many ride a bus to church services on Sunday morning.

The shelter provides families with three meals a day, prepared off-site by “community partners.”

“We pick up the meals and bring them here and serve them indoors. The food is decent. A typical lunch is a sandwich, salad, soup, granola bars, snacks, milk and water,” Guthrie said.

Guthrie told The Epoch Times that the family shelter is providing standard baby formula for the young children, but one baby is intolerant to it.

This infant requires a specialty brand that is hard to get—a fact that is upsetting to the mother and her child.

The Maine Immigrant Rights Coalition (MIRC) is providing asylum seekers residing in hotels and motels with some culturally appropriate foods such as fufu (an African staple), goat meat, greens, chicken, and rice, he said.

A lot of the accommodations do not have kitchens.

According to Guthrie, the cost per motel room is between $250 and $350 dollars per night and rising as the tourist season begins.

MIRC is part of a network of 85 statewide organizations involved in the care of the thousands of asylum seekers already here and those that are arriving daily.

Guthrie said the state is footing 70 percent of the family shelter’s expenses, with the city making up the remaining 30 percent.

But Guthrie says that getting the children into school is among the best assistance that can be provided.

“The schools offer all kinds of different programs. They have community resource officers. They keep the kids busy while giving them two meals a day,” he said.

More than 60 different foreign languages are spoken by students at Portland area schools, further complicating every task associated with education.

When asked about the overall health condition of the asylum seekers, Guthrie replied, “They are exhausted and scared. They haven’t travelled a safe route. Though clearly traumatized, very few will talk about the details of their experience. Counselling is available if requested.”

Teams of health care workers are performing what Guthrie calls “health outreach.” They have set up clinics at some of the motels to perform triage and make any necessary medical referrals.

The city of Portland has a busy public health clinic helping to provide treatment, but some people with more serious conditions end up in emergency rooms.

To overcome the language barrier, the city provides interpreters, and health care workers make use of cell phone translation apps.

On the whole, Guthrie said most of the people under his supervision are physically “very healthy.”

“Pregnancy is the families’ most urgent medical concern, and their most pressing medical need is OBGYN (obstetrics and gynecology) care,” he said.

He also said there is some sickle cell disease among them.

City Hall allowed The Epoch Times access to several families being warehoused outdoors and a number of parents were eager to talk about their current plight.

Speaking through an interpreter provided by the shelter, and in the presence of shelter director Guthrie, Samantha, a young Angolan woman with a 10-month-old baby on her hip and a toddler in tow, was not shy about sharing her dissatisfaction.

When asked if her family’s basic needs were being met, Samantha replied, “We just need a place to sleep. We stay outside in the sun and the elements because there is not enough space for us indoors. There are not enough clothes for my family.

“Being outside all day is not good for my baby. Some of us have caught colds. Some had fevers. Some were so sick they went to the hospital.

“My son eats a special baby formula. I have to ration his feeding.

“What we are fed is very different than what we are used to. We are receiving no culturally appropriate food. There was no way for us to take a shower for five days.

“We endured a seven-month journey to come to this! We are not happy. Conditions are not good! We really need help.”

When asked if she felt welcome, Samantha said with a look of disbelief, “No! I do not feel welcome. Look at us. We are outside.”
A Congolese family seeking asylum in Portland, Maine, on May 25, 2022. (Steven Kovac/Epoch Times)

Landry, a housepainter and electrician’s helper, brought his wife Sylvie, two-year-old daughter, and 12-month-old son to Portland from the Congo.

When asked why he risked the journey, Landry answered, “I left my country because of political issues and insecurity. There we could be sure of nothing. Here, it’s different.”

Sylvie said, “We came from Texas unprepared for this Maine weather. I am not happy for how I am living here. I don’t feel welcome!”
 
Poll Shows ‘Demographic Change’ Splits Nation

https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2022/06/06/poll-shows-demographic-change-splits-nation/

NEIL MUNRO 6 Jun 2022

Republican voters are growing more concerned about migration’s demographic impact on their nation, according to a YouGov poll.

The poll also shows that a large slice of the Democratic Party is eager for a high-migration society in which whites are a minority.

The poll asked: “By the year 2050, a majority of the population will be made up of people who are Black, Asian, Hispanic, and other racial minorities.”

Respondents were evenly split: 22 percent said the demographic change would be a “very” or a “somewhat” good thing,” while 20 percent said a “very” or a “somewhat” bad thing.

The two parties were mirror images of each other, according to the May 16-19 YouGov poll of 1,000 adults.

Thirty percent of people who voted for Joe Biden in 2020 say it would be “a very good thing,” and 14 percent said “a somewhat” good thing.

Just 3 percent of President Donald Trump’s voters said it would be a “very good thing.” But 19 percent said it would be a “very bad thing,” and 21 percent said it would be “somewhat bad.”

Overall, 44 percent of Democrats approve and 40 percent of Republicans oppose the demographic change.

Enter your email address
SUBSCRIBE
By subscribing, you agree to our terms of use & privacy policy. You will receive email marketing messages from Breitbart News Network to the email you provide. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Roughly 40 percent of all voters say it will be neither good nor bad, and roughly 20 percent said “not sure.”

The May poll follows a September 2021 poll by YouGov, which showed that 55 percent of Republicans believe that immigration makes American “worse off.” A similar YouGov poll in June showed the “worse off” GOP response was only 32 percent.

Source: YouGov
Source: YouGov

The worries of mainstream GOP voters were reflected in several other questions.

The poll asked: “Do you think the economic, political, and cultural influence of native-born Americans is currently decreasing, increasing, or staying about the same as it was?”

Thirty percent of the poll said native-born Americans are losing influence, including 50 percent of Trump voters and 20 percent of Biden voters. Almost 60 percent of respondents said the native-born influence was stable or that they were unsure.

The poll asked: whether the racial diversity caused by the demographic change will “strengthen customs and values.”

Thirty-two percent said it will weaken those values. That group includes 63 percent of Trump voters. But 43 percent of Biden voters said racial diversity would strengthen customs and values.

The poll asked: “Will Racial Diversity Lead To Conflict”?

Thirty-eight percent of all voters predicted “More conflicts between racial and ethnic groups.” That negative view was shared by 31 percent of Biden voters and 55 percent of Trump voters. Sixteen percent predicted few conflicts – including 24 percent of Biden voters.

The poll asked: “Do you think that an increase in immigration to the U.S. would politically benefit [Democrats or Republicans]?

Democrats split 37 percent good for Democrats and 3 percent good for Republicans. Republicans split 50 percent good for Democrats, 15 percent good for Republicans.

Interestingly, Hispanics split 25 percent good for Democrats, 9 percent good for Republicans — and 65 percent “neither party/not sure.” That split answer likely echoes the large-scale shift of Latino voting intentions towards the GOP since they gained under Trump’s low-migration/high-wage policies.

The poll also asked: “Discrimination against White people has become as big a problem as discrimination against Black people. Do you agree or disagree”?

A plurality of 49 percent of whites agreed on growing anti-white discrimination. Twenty-five percent of whites strongly agreed, and 24 percent “somewhat agreed.”

For Trump voters, 41 percent “strongly” agreed and 33 percent “somewhat” agreed.

Sixty percent of Biden’s voters “strongly” disagreed,

The poll comes as many Democrats try to suppress debate over the nation’s changing demographics by smearing various worries as “Replacement Theory.”

But only one-third, or 33 percent, of the poll’s respondents said they were familiar with the left’s “Replacement Theory” term for demographic change. Only 27 percent of Republicans knew of the term, but 48 percent of Democrats — including 51 percent of Biden voters — recognized the “Replacement Theory” term.

Nonetheless, Democratic supporters praise the emerging demographic changes as a national renewal.

“The phenomenon of [population] replacement, writ large, is America, and has been from the beginning, sometimes by force, mostly by choice,” New York Times columnist Bret Stephens wrote May 17. “What the far right calls ‘replacement’ is better described as renewal.”

The YouGov poll also showed Americans trying to frame their demographic concerns as non-racial worries about national cohesion.

For example, when asked about African immigration, 27 percent of Biden voters wanted more, while 54 percent of Trump voters wanted less. But when asked about Russian migrants, 14 percent of Biden voters wanted more, while 58 percent of Trump voters wanted less.

When asked about Ukrainian migrants, 37 percent of Biden voters wanted more and 34 percent of Trump voters wanted less.

Similarly, 61 percent of Trump voters declared they have an unfavorable view of “white nationalists,” while 15 percent said they have a favorable view. The poll did not describe the term to the respondents.

Also, most voters dodged the questions, likely because they lacked knowledge about the numbers and did not want to seem hostile. For example, when asked if African migration, 12 percent said it should be increased and 29 percent said it should be decreased — but 59 percent said “stay the same” or “not sure.”

Other polls ask respondents for their views on immigration and economics. For example, a May 31 poll by Rassmussen Reports showed that “Fifty-five percent (55%) said it’s better to raise pay and try harder to recruit non-working Americans than to bring in new foreign workers in the construction, manufacturing and service industries.”

However, both GOP leaders and Democrats prefer to ignore the economic impact of migration on ordinary Americans.

Extraction Migration

Since at least 1990, the D.C. establishment has extracted tens of millions of migrants and visa workers from poor countries to serve as legal or illegal workers, temporary workers, consumers, and renters for various U.S. investors and CEOs.

The annual inflow is roughly 2 million legal and illegal immigrants, just as four million Americans turn 18 and join the workforce.

This economic strategy of Extraction Migration has no stopping point. It is brutal to ordinary Americans because it cuts their career opportunities, shrinks their salaries and wages, raises their housing costs, and has shoved at least ten million American men to the sidelines of society.

Extraction migration also distorts the economy and curbs Americans’ productivity, partly because it allows employers to use stoop labor instead of machines. Migration also reduces voters’ political clout, undermines employees’ workplace rights, and widens the regional wealth gaps between the Democrats’ big coastal states and the Republicans’ heartland and southern states.

An economy built on extraction migration also alienates young people and radicalizes Americans’ democratic, compromise-promoting civic culture because it allows wealthy elites to ignore despairing Americans at the bottom of society.
 
The vast majority of the new arrivals at the family shelter in Portland have come from Angola and the Congo in Africa, with some coming from Haiti in the Caribbean.

They make the arduous and often dangerous journey any way they can—largely on foot.

now that is impressive.

These people walk on water.
 
They should be overwhelming the shelters from the home country from whence they came or be sent to another country so that they can be their problem.
 
Last edited:
On whose dime?

Cheaper to ship 'em further nawth to Canuk-a-Stan...

They can come back too easily, the northern border is worse to defend than the southern border, eventually we may have to liberate Canada and purge it in self defense since they are importing so many on their own.

They must be sent overseas or across a properly fortifies southern border, it's about time Mexico got some payback for helping so many invaders come here.

We may be able to make people responsible for bringing them here pay, but even if we can't it will save money to be rid of them because they cost us so much.
 
Back
Top