Assuming we let Pearl Harbor happen in order to get public support for war...

That's very interesting information. I look forward to your book to go into more detail. Thanks for sharing and I wish you the best with your book, and I hope you post the release date of it on this forum once known.

TY.. In all honesty it will probably just go into the pile of other crap I have written that just sits here waiting until I have enough self esteem to actually send it somewhere lol
 
TY.. In all honesty it will probably just go into the pile of other crap I have written that just sits here waiting until I have enough self esteem to actually send it somewhere lol

I think it would be a good idea to give a shot at testing viewer visitation and response by writing some articles and/or posting some chapters on a blog and linking it up on liberty forums and the like? That would probably settle the whole self esteem issue with certainty about feedback to your work.
 
What would you have done if you were president and you "knew" that eventually Germany would invade the US and that if you wait long enough that you won't have many powerful allies left to assist?

If I "knew" that eventually Germany would invade the US, I would have to un-know a lot of things.

If you travel from London to Istanbul, how many different nations, cultures, languages, and religions are you going to encounter, just going in a direct line?

There is less physical distance between those two cities than there is between New York and Los Angeles.
In the time we're talking about, almost every single state in between NY and LA had foundries, machinists, farms, food processing plants, ore, fuels, wood, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, and free people who knew what to do with them.
That we tapped into all that so effectively is the only reason why we were able to do what we did in Europe.

If tiny little Germany wanted to invade the US in the 1940's, and I was president of the USA, all I'd say is "bring it, chumps".

Today we have remote-controlled flying killbots, and we can't subjugate some stone-age hillbillies living in caves in the world's armpit.
Germany's defeat by us was a foregone conclusion when we started. To suggest they would be able to do the reverse is ridiculous.
 
If I "knew" that eventually Germany would invade the US, I would have to un-know a lot of things.

If you travel from London to Istanbul, how many different nations, cultures, languages, and religions are you going to encounter, just going in a direct line?

There is less physical distance between those two cities than there is between New York and Los Angeles.
In the time we're talking about, almost every single state in between NY and LA had foundries, machinists, farms, food processing plants, ore, fuels, wood, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, and free people who knew what to do with them.
That we tapped into all that so effectively is the only reason why we were able to do what we did in Europe.

If tiny little Germany wanted to invade the US in the 1940's, and I was president of the USA, all I'd say is "bring it, chumps".

Today we have remote-controlled flying killbots, and we can't subjugate some stone-age hillbillies living in caves in the world's armpit.
Germany's defeat by us was a foregone conclusion when we started. To suggest they would be able to do the reverse is ridiculous.

While the Germans did have an impressive military . It is unrealistic to think of conquering the world . One thing they should have considered ahead of time is that it would not be plausible to hold Europe .
 
Back
Top