Assange: It's Over Hillary!

AuH20

Account Restricted. Admin to review account standing
Joined
Feb 20, 2009
Messages
28,739
http://investmentwatchblog.com/assange-its-over-hillary-october-surprise-biggest-leak-to-date/


Wikileaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange promised to release more damning emails about the Clinton Foundation, and warned he has enough evidence on Hillary Clinton making secret deals with an alleged Islamic State sponsor for the FBI to indict her.

Asked by British journalist Afshin Rattansi on Saturday if he had “the email which will put Hillary Clinton behind bars,” Assange claimed to have 350 emails on a French transnational concrete company named Le Farge that allegedly paid ISIS to do business in regions controlled by the terror group.

The report, by British political blog The Canary, showed the Clinton Foundation accepted upwards of $100,000 from the ISIS sponsoring company.
 
I'll believe it not only if and when I see it (the email leak That is) but also the FBI and our corrupt Justice Department actually then doing something about it.
 
I'll believe it not only if and when I see it (the email leak That is) but also the FBI and our corrupt Justice Department actually then doing something about it.

What more does the Loretta Lynch"er" Justice Department need to indict the lame ex-NY Senator with
her TOTAL dereliction of duty as the nation's Secretary of State ?

This is a continuation to disingenuously (by the msm) to keep calling it all just "leaked e-mails" - which sounds rather innocuous, eh ?

But, Hillary Clinton's crime is a subterfuge of government business by a "lackey" unprotected internet access -
an increased espionage threat to the USA because of her illegal/unauthorized actions.

The Justice Department already has ALL that they need to convict her -
Hillary used a private mom and pop cyberspace server that was run out of a Denver apartment -
it is very much like the same modus operandi as when Hillary as First Lady subterfuge of the White House Travel Office that had served both Republican and Democrat Presidents for decades, n'est-ce pas ?

Are they all still afraid of an old hag Hillary . . . why ?
US Justice Dept. even has a cold case murder still out there . . . just connect the dots Mr. Trump to the Mena, AR Bill/Hill Clinton "problem" -
a open murder case still open that occurred the month before White House Counsel Vince Foster's 1993 alleged "suicide" - very "fishy" indeed!




____________________________________________________________________________________

 
Well, unless you can produce an unedited video of them actually handing her the check, it won't hurt her in the polls. They don't care.
 
Well, unless you can produce an unedited video of them actually handing her the check, it won't hurt her in the polls. They don't care.

A fair share of this country deserves nuclear cinder for being so blissfully ignorant. I hate to say it, but it's true.
 
A fair share of this country deserves nuclear cinder for being so blissfully ignorant. I hate to say it, but it's true.

Ignorant and fearful. I had a respectful conversation with a liberal voting for Clinton, and there's nothing we could have said to change her mind. She knows the Foundation is shady. She admits HRC is a compulsive liar. She's well aware of HRC's documented uncontrollable outbursts of rage. She was going to vote for Bernie, but she's going to pull the lever for the woman who rigged the primary because that's what's best for the country.

Donald might say something mean, and "we" need to stop him. Johnson isn't viable, according to her.
 
Ignorant and fearful. I had a respectful conversation with a liberal voting for Clinton, and there's nothing we could have said to change her mind. She knows the Foundation is shady. She admits HRC is a compulsive liar. She's well aware of HRC's documented uncontrollable outbursts of rage. She was going to vote for Bernie, but she's going to pull the lever for the woman who rigged the primary because that's what's best for the country.

Donald might say something mean, and "we" need to stop him. Johnson isn't viable, according to her.

They are so easily manipulated by the faux outrage of the day. I had one tell me that Donald Trump's tone is beneath the office of the presidency. I told him matter of factly that 'tone' is purely a public relations tool for deception, while they punish internal whistle-blowers and instigate foreign wars behind the scenes. I for one would welcome a president who is not scripted. Like Pat Buchanan once said, we don't want to hear 'poll-tested mush' for the weak-minded.
 
Last edited:
They are so easily manipulated by the faux outrage of the day. I had one tell me that Donald Trump's tone is beneath the office of the presidency. I told him matter of factly that 'tone' is purely a public relations tool for deception, while they punish internal whistle-blowers and instigate foreign wars behind the scenes. I for one would welcome a president who is not scripted. Like Pat Buchanan once said, we don't want to hear 'poll-tested mush' for the weak-minded.

Sure. But Trump spends far too much time responding to the attacks.
 
. . . I had a respectful conversation with a liberal voting for Clinton, and there's nothing we could have said to change (their) mind
. . .
Donald might say something mean, and "we" need to stop him. Johnson isn't viable, according to her.

Hah, reminded me of a conversation with an old-timer (Dimocrat) right before both of the the conventions had started.

This guy seemed like he was at least trying to come across as evangelical or something I'll guess - but he was serious when he said
something like "It proves that Hillary is religious, because she forgives Bill (for the Oval Office Monica Lewinsky affair)"

Is the electorate going to come up with all sorts of lunancy to rationalize a vote for the First Lady of a scandalous White House ? *sigh*
 
No scandal has stopped the Clintons yet. Why would this be any different?

Assange is just going to get himself added to the Clinton body count.
 
Agree.

Assange could release the smoking gun and boobus would yawn and ask what is on TV tonight. As long as boobus is in a coma, Clintons can get away with murder.

Now if Assange had something to jar boobus from his slumber.... with enough juice to force a response.... now that could be interesting.
 


 
Last edited:

200.gif
 
They are so easily manipulated by the faux outrage of the day.
I think it's pure fear. As the candidates get worse and worse, each election cycle, people vote purely to keep the other guy out of office.

It's as with life. I really do not fear death. I live solely for the love of life, but I sense that many people live only out of a fear of death. That is the sad state of the average voter.
 
Back
Top