Assange: Everyone wants Pence In and Trump Out

[AuH20]

even the Clintons as well.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Wikileaks' Assange Claims Hillary, Intel Officials "Quietly Pushing A Pence Takeover"
by Tyler Durden - Mar 14, 2017

Over the weekend we noted chatter that some saw Mike Pence as "the Deep State's insurance policy," and now, judging by tweets from Wikileaks' Julian Assange, that may well be the Clinton/Intelligence Officials plan...

Clinton stated privately this month that she is quietly pushing for a Pence takeover. She stated that Pence is predictable hence defeatable.

— Julian Assange (@JulianAssange) March 14, 2017

Adding that...

Two IC officials close to Pence stated privately this month that they are planning on a Pence takeover. Did not state if Pence agrees.

— Julian Assange (@JulianAssange) March 14, 2017

As The Daily Caller notes, Assange’s claims appear to come in response to reports that President Trump authorized the CIA to perform drone strikes on terrorists Monday evening...

By handing unilateral power to the CIA over its drone strikes at this time White House signals that bullying, disloyalty & incompetence pays

— Julian Assange (@JulianAssange) March 14, 2017

As we concluded previously, if Trump doesn’t adopt the Cold War 2.0 approach of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and is forced out of his own administration in the same manner as Flynn, it will become clear why once we learn who would replace him: Mike Pence.

No matter what one makes of Trump - or his administration and the policies that have been initiated thus far - the fact remains that Trump won the U.S. election. The people working behind the scenes to oust him are not subject to democratic controls, nor are they working in the best interests of the American public. We are left to ask ourselves exactly how renewing relations with Russia – a nuclear power – could possibly endanger American lives.

Either way, we are more or less left with two paths ahead of us. The first path involves Trump giving in and adopting an anti-Russian agenda, as is already apparent in his decision to send more ground troops to Syria alongside Saudi troops, who will intentionally oppose the Syrian regime (a close ally of Russia). The second involves the possibility of another direct coup within the Trump administration, this time one that may ultimately force Trump out of the White House so he can be replaced by Mike Pence, a war hawk who will be more than happy to do the job Hillary Clinton wanted to do.

 

[AuH20]

Has there been a historical precedent where the POTUS replaced the VP? I know that Agnew was forced to resign.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Has there been a historical precedent where the POTUS replaced the VP?

Usually under scandal situations, but yes, POTUS can ask for VP resignation whenever they want. [edited again for clarity]

 

[pcosmar]

Has there been a historical precedent where the POTUS replaced the VP? I know that Agnew was forced to resign.

Reagan Bush

 

[dannno]

Alex Jones for emergency VP?

 

[Valli6]

Didn't ya just always know this was gonna happen? The day Pence's name was floated for VP, I think everyone on this forum knew there was some plot in the works.

 

[AuH20]

Appointing Rand Paul as VP would likely start a hot civil war within the Deep State, the likes we would have never seen.

 

[Zippyjuan]

Rand Paul as VP would likely start a hot civil war within the Deep State, the likes we would have never seen.

Trump only likes yes men and loyalists. Rand isn't one of those. No chance of Trump offering Rand anything.

 

[dannno]

Trump only likes yes men and loyalists. Rand isn't one of those. No chance of Trump offering Rand anything.

You watch too much cartoons.

 

[AuH20]

Trump only likes yes men and loyalists. Rand isn't one of those. No chance of Trump offering Rand anything.

It would keep him protected, that's for sure. Rand Paul would be the ultimate life insurance policy.

 

[Zippyjuan]

It would keep him protected, that's for sure. Rand Paul would be the ultimate life insurance policy.

You suggesting nobody would want to see Rand Paul as president?

 

[Valli6]

Trump only likes yes men and loyalists. Rand isn't one of those. No chance of Trump offering Rand anything.

But unlike most politicians, Rand has doctor skills and can express and explain an opposing viewpoint - without making the other person feel insulted. Rand's honest input, could only make Trump a better president. Of course if Trump really wanted to rile the deep state, he'd put RON Paul in some position of power!

 

[pao]

Unless it was to just get him out of the Senate, and then fire later.

 

[AuH20]

You suggesting nobody would want to see Rand Paul as president?

Not the people in power. At least with Trump, they can negotiate. I don't see that with Rand as chief executive.

 

[nikcers]

Not the people in power. At least with Trump, they can negotiate. I don't see that with Rand as chief executive.

There can be no negotiation with our freedom. Either bring our troops home or we will impeach you.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

It would keep him protected, that's for sure. Rand Paul would be the ultimate life insurance policy.

You mean Ron Paul... Rand is working hard in the Senate.

 

[nikcers]

You mean Ron Paul... Rand is working hard in the Senate.

FUCK Trump's transition buddy Reince Priebus. This should be Ron Paul's second term. Ron Paul would of atleast won the popular vote over the most unpopular politician in my lifetime.

 

[TheCount]

Why would anyone think that Trump would want to replace Pence with someone better? He chose him in the first place. Is this another area where we're going to pretend like Trump really wanted to do something great but couldn't because... reasons?

 

[AuH20]

Why would anyone think that Trump would want to replace Pence with someone better? He chose him in the first place. Is this another area where we're going to pretend like Trump really wanted to do something great but couldn't because... reasons?

Pence was chosen to appease the highly influential Christian Dominionist sect as well as the GOPe. It was a negotiating tactic made for further support and gains. The GOPe controls both the House and the Senate. Several appeasements were made so Trump's campaign and agenda could proceed forward.