As children's brains are being eaten by vaccines, parents urged to ignore the symptoms and

SWATH said:
The science behind them is to expose your immune system to a weakened, killed, or partial pathogen like for instance polio for your body to develop antibodies against without actually acquiring the disease. Once your immune system learns how to make antibodies against it, if you are ever exposed to the actual disease then you can fight it off before it can infect you or before it overwhelms your defenses. This is also why breast milk is so important, it is full of the mothers antibodies from all of the illnesses she has an immunity for, when the baby drinks it these antibodies are transferred to the baby and will protect him from disease, one way is by coating the inside of his mucus membranes like the nose and throat killing any pathogen that they come into contact with when inhaled.
Click to expand...


The Polio vaccine and SV40 (Simian Virus 40)? They knowingly knew that SV-40 would give people cancer and they continued allowing it to be put in. That should give anyone pause who think vaccines are good for them and that Big pHARMa is looking out for our best interest!

 
donnay said:
The Polio vaccine and SV40 (Simian Virus 40)? They knowingly knew that SV-40 would give people cancer and they continued allowing it to be put in. That should give anyone pause who think vaccines are good for them and that Big pHARMa is looking out for our best interest!

Click to expand...


It is true that simian virus 40 was in some polio vaccines but at the time there was no way of knowing that it was there or to test for it. Once it was identified and a test developed it was removed and hasn't been found in any vaccines since 1963 and no increased risks of cancer have been traced to it. If that video included the entire interview, that would have been explained.

http://www.virology.ws/2010/04/13/poliovirus-vaccine-sv40-and-human-cancer/
Deep sequencing – which identified a viral contaminant of the rotavirus vaccine Rotarix - could have revealed the presence of simian virus 40 (SV40) in the poliovirus vaccine, had the technique been available in the 1950s. Exposure of over 100 million Americans to SV40, and many more worldwide, could have been avoided, as well as the debate about the role of this monkey virus in human cancer.

SV40 was discovered by Maurice Hilleman in 1960 as a contaminant of poliovirus vaccine. It was present in batches of both the Salk and Sabin poliovirus vaccines produced and distributed from 1954 to 1963. The source was the rhesus and cynomolgous monkey kidney cells used to produce the vaccine. Even more troubling was the observation that SV40 could cause tumors in hamsters. By 1963 screening procedures were instituted to ensure the absence of SV40 in poliovirus vaccines. Ironically, monkey cells were used for poliovirus vaccine production because it was feared that human cells might contain unknown human cancer viruses.

SV40 does not cause tumors in its natural host – monkeys – because it kills infected cells. However, in the wrong host- such as a hamster – the viral replication cycle is incomplete and virions are not produced. At a very low frequency, pieces of the viral DNA become integrated into the host chromosomal DNA. Problems arise if these viral DNA fragments encode the viral T (tumor) antigen. This protein is essential for lytic replication (which takes place in monkey cells) because it kick-starts cellular DNA synthesis. The cellular DNA synthetic machinery is then co-opted for replication of the viral DNA. When only T antigen is present, the cells divide without stopping – they are transformed, and on the way to becoming a tumor. SV40 does not need to cause tumors as part of its life cycle; they are an aberrant result of having T antigen push the cells to divide. SV40 T antigen can transform human cells, and therefore in theory the virus could cause human tumors.

The results of epidemiological studies initiated in the 1960s through the 1970s, in which thousands of poliovirus vaccine recipients were studied, indicated that this population did not have an increased risk of developing cancer.
Click to expand...

I note that the Whale link in the post above claims that SV40 is still found in polio vaccines so it must be out date since that has not been true for almost 50 years now.

Then you have Contaminants like SV40 that is still in the polio vaccines1.
Click to expand...

Some east European countries and China were still using old batches which did contain it as recently as 1980 which would still be over 30 years ago.
 
Last edited:
Zippyjuan said:
It is true that simian virus 40 was in some polio vaccines but at the time there was no way of knowing that it was there or to test for it. Once a test was developed it was removed and hasn't been found in any vaccines since 1963 and no cases of cancer have been traced to it. If that video included the entire interview, that would have been explained.

http://www.virology.ws/2010/04/13/poliovirus-vaccine-sv40-and-human-cancer/
Click to expand...


Today's Polio Vaccine still contaminated with Cancer-Causing SV-40

Nov 2002
A bombshell was dropped less than an hour ago at the Third International
Conference on Vaccine Safety hosted by the National Vaccine Information
Centre in Washington D.C.

Stanley Kops, a lawyer who has had his information on polio vaccines
published in peer-reviewed medical journals and who has presented data
at the Institute of Medicine (IOM) conference on SV-40 in mid-2002
(results published in October 2002), has produced proof positive that
the oral polio vaccine has always been contaminated with SV-40, a monkey
virus which has been linked by the FDA and other organisations with
cancers such as mesothelioma and meduloblastoma.

Since 1963, we have been assured that polio vaccines have not contained
this deadly contaminant.

Stanley Kops shows that not only is this not the case, but that the
vaccine regulators who are charged with keeping our families safe, have
known all along that SV-40 was never removed from vaccines.

The rate of childhood cancers have skyrocketed since the early 1960's.
Have we been unwittingly exposing our children to one of the most feared
illnesses by trying to protect them from polio with a vaccine that many
European countries have never used because of the known dangers
associated with them?

Continued...

Also this link: http://www.whale.to/b/hoax1.html


More info:
http://vactruth.com/2011/04/09/polio-vaccine-sv40-cancer/
http://www.thinktwice.com/Polio.pdf
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...or-states-cancer-linked-to-polio-vaccine.aspx
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/cancerandpolio.htm


ETA:

You need to find the book Dr. Mary's Monkey by Edward T. Haskam and read it.

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKshermanM.htm
 
Last edited:
So I take it that the anti-vax people never had their kids in public school?

Given the small numbers of home-schoolers, I find that hard to believe...let's have some reality here.
 
Thanks for the link. I am checking into it. Whale does not always have accurate information. So far what I have found is only an article indicating that he found that companies were no longer testing for it. This is not proof that it is still being used. Still looking.
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/94/3/229.1.full
As noted in that article, internal Lederle documents indicate that the company has not been able to document that it tested all vaccine seeds to confirm the absence of SV40 contamination. Therefore, statements in Nelson's article, such as “[p]eople most likely to have received contaminated vaccines were born from 1941 through 1961,” are inaccurate and potentially misleading.
Click to expand...

Here is a link to Stanley Kop's published paper- here too he is using a lack of testing of every single batch of every vaccine as "evidence" that SV40 is still present- without offering any proof or even a single test showing that it is actually still there. http://www.sv40cancer.com/pap1.asp
The absence of confirmatory testing of the seeds, as well as testimony of a Lederle manager, indicate that this claim of removal of SV40 and the testing for SV40 in all the seeds cannot be fully substantiated.

These legal documents and testimony indicate that the scientific community should not be content with prior assumptions that SV40 could not have been in the oral polio vaccine. Only further investigation by outside scientific and independent researchers who can review the test results claimed in the January 1997 meeting and who can conduct their own independent evaluations by testing all the seeds and individual monovalent pools will assure that SV40 has not been present in commercially sold oral poliovirus vaccine manufactured by Lederle.
Click to expand...

This is not any proof at all that SV40 has been found in any vaccine in the last 30 years.

Neither does he show that
but that the
vaccine regulators who are charged with keeping our families safe, have
known all along that SV-40 was never removed from vaccines.
Click to expand...

The article is misleading and wrong to claim that he has any proof that it is still in vaccines.

As a lawyer, he should demand and be able to produce much better proof than that. If this was the proof presented in a court of law the case would be thrown out.

At a later presentation he admits he does not know if there is any SV40 in any vaccines or have proof of that:
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...after-1961-harrismartin-reports-76171302.html
"Whether SV40 was removed from Sabin Oral Polio Virus strains remains a
serious and unanswered question," writes Kops, who has represented several
plaintiffs in polio vaccine products liability cases.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
And these aren't corner cases we're exploding out of proportion, correct?
At the end of the day what's right is right and I didn't know The Party required vaccines. Will parents go to jail/lose their child if they refuse to get these vaccines?
I never planned on having kids simply because of what this third rock from the sun is devolving into. I absolutely refuse to have kids if anything mentioned above is true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top