Article saying Ron Paul should drop out :(

[Nathaniele]

http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NTAzNDYxYWMwYmU4ZWY4ODVmZGJiNTQ1ZDFiNmU2Mzk=

 

[wstrucke]

meh... you'll have that

 

[Doriath]

While I disagree that Paul should drop out or be excluded from the debate, this much of the post rings true to me:

Of course, there's another question inherent in this... do we really need a 21st debate? I suppose if the race really has come down to McCain vs. Romney, we ought to see them go nose-to-nose. But we're reaching the point where everything that these guys need to say has been said. Let's vote and get this over with.

+1. The whole primary debates thing has become a joke, IMHO.

 

[spudea]

wow tonight is the 20th debate. I hope RP does awesome tonight!

 

[noztnac]

While I disagree that Paul should drop out or be excluded from the debate, this much of the post rings true to me:



+1. The whole primary debates thing has become a joke, IMHO.

They still haven't resolved anything. They need to have a real debate about monetary policy and foreign policy. Maybe now Ron Paul will get some time to force some debate.

 

[noztnac]

I think maybe that writer should quit writing. After decades of writing inane nonsense for National Review hasn't he had a chance to break out and become a real writer? Do we really need more mindless drivel from yet another irrelevant internet hack?

 

[newyearsrevolution08]

Ron Paul drop out? KMA

Weed all these other bastards out gives ron paul more time to talk and the ability for Americans to WAKE UP. Hello people open your eyes you are being lied to.

We also have chumps coming in here trying to toss in articles about him dropping out to bring down morale and once again I say KMA....

Ron Paul is not going to go away no matter how many articles, posts, videos, commentaries or media b.s. they try and toss at us.

Remember this is the part where they will try and discredit and talk shit on him. The reason for it, they need him to drop out or he might actually win this thing.

We are not going anywhere. We will see you in the general election whether as a repub or 3rd party.

 

[ZzzImAsleep]

meh.......if Ron Paul was given half the attention that the others get, he would be the front runner.

 

[Original_Intent]

No they need real debates instead of these moderated circuses that do nothing but muddy the water.

The moderators should have one job - to enforce speaking time limits so that everyone gets a chance to speak and there is no "filibustering".

Other than that, debates should either be one on one affairs with free give and take between the candidates, or if mullitple candidates, each candidate posing a question and all other getting a chance to respond and then moving to the next candidate for a question.

The current so-called debates give way too much power to the moderators (MSM) in how a candidate is perceived.

 

[WarDog]

WTF he's just getting started. Huck will leave very soon. then Romney or McCain

 

[newyearsrevolution08]

agreed,

have a cut off mic button for each of them

once the time is done, their mic stops working. That will shut them up.

 

[redzone]

Here's what is going to happen. Huck will be out pretty soon leaving romney and mccain to cannabilize one another. Ron Paul will be the only one left standing with a unique message that connects with people.

 

[nikolai]

+1. The whole primary debates thing has become a joke, IMHO.

I never really understood how a nationally televised debate in Florida would only appeal to Florida voters. I remember at the beginning of the debate they were talking about how all kinds of people in Florida were seeing the candidates for the first time. Whatever. The small portion of people that actually vote in primaries are those that actually half way give a damn and aren't waiting until the last minute to decide based on a local debate.

 

[Molly1]

We "have not yet begun to fight!"

 

[VoteForRonPaul]

But the next debate after Super Tuesday really ought to be at least a three man stage, if not a two-man one.

Am I right guys?Is not "at least three" means 3 or more

 

[kickzman]

Fuck him, Dr Paul will stay on until they swear him in to the WH as Prez!

 

[Loke]

Am I right guys?Is not "at least three" means 3 or more

I think they need to have 20 more debates where Ron Paul gets to speak and put them on the spot to expose their lies, ignorance and what they really stand for.

 

[Doriath]

No they need real debates instead of these moderated circuses that do nothing but muddy the water.

I could get behind a real debate -- you know, one that has a proposition and sides that argue for and against. Have a debate solely about Iraq or soley about the economy or solely about social policy. That might actually be useful. But this :30-to-answer crap is worthless.

 

[newyearsrevolution08]

The next will be this

1. Ron Paul
2. Mittens Romney
3. Mccain

and odds are many of the hucksters coming to our side to kick romney and mccain out due to their to be 100% honest INSANE ideals that will do NOTHING but help the country go into MORE debt.

When it comes down to it the hucksters in my opinion want the following

1. a christian who actually lives his life based on his beliefs and Ron Paul has shown that with his voting record, him being married to the SAME woman for going on 51 years to name a few things.

2. get rid of the irs, come on people we all know where the huckster got that great idea from RON PAUL!

3. get the country back to where it should be based on the CONSTITUTION and guess where ONCE AGAIN the huckster got that great idea from? Ron Paul of course.


I think they will soon see the light.

 

[The Only Woj]

fact is, people don't want the debates until it's there time. people in California probably didn't tune into the Florida debates. They'll tune in tonight.