Arrested And Deported For Exercising First Amendment Rights?

Bout I was told that the rights of Americans were not endangered by all this.

How about this one then (coming from a Fathers' Rights contact): Trump Admin. Deports 2-Year-old US Citizen
... The father and daughter are US citizens ... but I'm left to assume that the child was suspected of being a violent gang member. The father had been seeking custody of the child.

Court documents reveal that a two-year-old U.S. citizen, identified as "V.M.L.," was deported to Honduras on Friday along with her Honduran-born mother and sister after they were detained earlier in the week by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials.

According to filings, the child—born in New Orleans in 2023, as shown by a redacted U.S. birth certificate submitted to the court—had accompanied her mother and sister to a routine immigration check-in at ICE's New Orleans office on Tuesday, where all three were detained and scheduled for deportation.



Upon learning of his family's detention, V.M.L.'s father contacted ICE through his lawyer to inform them that his daughter was a U.S. citizen and could not legally be deported.

"Around 7:30 p.m. the same day, V.M.L.'s father received a call from an ICE officer, who spoke to him for about a minute," a court filing states. "The officer said that V.M.L.'s mother was there, and that they did not have much time to speak to each other and that they were going to deport his partner and daughters."

In an effort to halt the deportation of the two daughters, the father Tuesday filed for a temporary transfer of legal custody, which under Louisiana law would give his sister-in-law, a U.S. citizen who resides in Baton Rouge, custody of both.

On Thursday, an attorney for a family friend—who had been given provisional custody of the child—filed a request for a temporary restraining order, urging the court to immediately release V.M.L. arguing she was suffering "irreparable harm" while detained.


In response, Justice Department lawyers argued that it was in the child's best interest to remain in her mother's legal custody and dismissed concerns about her status, writing, "V.M.L. is not prohibited from entering the United States."

Trump administration officials told the court that the mother had informed ICE officials she wished to take V.M.L. with her to Honduras, submitting a handwritten Spanish-language note they claimed confirmed her intent.
 
How about this one then (coming from a Fathers' Rights contact): Trump Admin. Deports 2-Year-old US Citizen
... The father and daughter are US citizens ... but I'm left to assume that the child was suspected of being a violent gang member. The father had been seeking custody of the child.
.

This reminded me of Elian Gonzalez so I went back and took a look at that old thread. Interesting.
 
How about this one then (coming from a Fathers' Rights contact): Trump Admin. Deports 2-Year-old US Citizen
... The father and daughter are US citizens ... but I'm left to assume that the child was suspected of being a violent gang member. The father had been seeking custody of the child.
The mother was in possession of the child, and when she was rightly deported she asked that her child not be taken from her but be sent with her.

Take your nonsense elsewhere.

And Anchor babies aren't real citizens anyway, Trump is putting an end to that lie.
 
The mother was in possession of the child, and when she was rightly deported she asked that her child not be taken from her but be sent with her.

Take your nonsense elsewhere.

And Anchor babies aren't real citizens anyway, Trump is putting an end to that lie.
Anchor baby? Even the INS recognized that the child was a US citizen - which is why the mother was given the option of leaving the child in the US. The child's father is a US citizen, which makes the child a US citizen (Or do you apply the "one drop rule" to citizenship?).

And while the mother was saying she'd take the child with her, the father was saying, "No, don't deport the child". Is it your position that the mother's wishes win out over the US Citizen Father's wishes? Doesn't the US Citizen Father have due process rights before his US Citizen daughter is deported? Non-custodial parents are typically allowed to legally challenge the removal of their children from the jurisdiction before any such children can be removed. They don't always prevail, but they have due process.
 
Last edited:
Anchor baby? Even the INS recognized that the child was a US citizen - which is why the mother was given the option of leaving the child in the US. The child's father is a US citizen, which makes the child a US citizen (Or do you apply the "one drop rule" to citizenship?).

And while the mother was saying she'd take the child with her, the father was saying, "No, don't deport the child". Is it your position that the mother's wishes win out over the US Citizen Father's wishes? Doesn't the US Citizen Father have due process rights before his US Citizen daughter is deported? Non-custodial parents are typically allowed to legally challenge the removal of their children from the jurisdiction before any such children can be removed. They don't always prevail, but they have due process.
I'll need to see the father's actual status to say whether or not the child has citizenship based on him being the father.
But since the child is only 2 the child's citizenship isn't really important.

The mother had custody and possession of the child, it's not the government's business to take it from her when she wants to take it with her.
If the father wants to fight for custody then he can do so, our country and her country have courts for such fights, ICE is not the proper authority to decide them.

This obviously exceptional and convoluted situation has no bearing on the rights of Americans, you're just fearmongering to try to prevent the removal of the invaders.
 
Back
Top