Armed man, posing as security, arrested at RFK Jr. campaign event in California

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,613
EXCLUSIVE: Armed Man Arrested at Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Event in L.A.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...arrested-at-robert-f-kennedy-jr-event-in-l-a/

JOEL B. POLLAK 15 Sep 2023

LOS ANGELES, California — An armed man was detained by security and later arrested by police before the start of an event with Democratic presidential contender Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Friday evening with the Hispanic community in Los Angeles.

According to sources, the man arrived at the event and claimed to be employed by the organizers. Campaign security officials, however, did not recognize him, and detained him until police arrived.

The man was found to be carrying a handgun and ammunition. He will likely face charges of impersonating a police officer or federal agent, and possibly unlawful possession of firearms, according to Breitbart News sources.

The Kennedy campaign is sensitive to security concerns, given the tragic history of the Kennedy family. President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in 1963, and Sen. Robert F. Kennedy — the current candidate’s father — was assassinated in 1968 in Los Angeles, shortly after winning the California Democratic presidential primary.

In July, Kennedy noted that the Biden administration had denied him Secret Service protection, despite the fact that he had requested it from the Department of Homeland Security, and had extensively documented the need for it.

Kennedy is gaining on President Joe Biden in some polls, though he still trails overall by a wide margin. Many Democrats say they would like to vote for a candidate other than the incumbent.
 
possibly unlawful possession of firearms

Good that he was detained. I just don't know what to make about "possibly unlawful possession of firearms". Outlined in the 2nd... unless he was a convicted felon and that is why...

I'm not sure why anybody would request DHS security. For starters, that agency needs to be shut down. Secondly, it should be up to the individual to provide his/her own security and not on the tax payer dime.
 
Back
Top