Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher

Just read this on DU:

Because Conservatives brought guns. They don't beg for permission. They don't hang out in free speech zones. They forced the government to back down for everyone's safety.

Occupy hung out in a park until forced to move. They offered no resistance. Cops swooped in, stole and disposed of their shit, and arrested a bunch of people. If Occupy had built barricades and weapons, things would have been different.
Jackbooted thugs like cops are bullies and cowards. They won't risk their lives if they can help it. They prey on the weak. You resist with any amount of force, they will back down. BLM proved that today.
 
article-2603026-1D103FEC00000578-811_634x439_zpsea0ec0f6.jpg


a cop would have had his finger on the trigger
 
hahaha....maybe, just maybe, that will get some of the anti nuts to thinking.
 
For what it's worth. This could all be BS, but stay vigilant:

http://www.stevequayle.com/index.php?s=33&d=877

At 1750 hours ET, I was contacted by my source within the Department of Homeland Security regarding the current situation at the Bundy Ranch. To put it bluntly, the people are being hoodwinked into believing that the situation is being resolved. It is not. It is a strategic de-escalation to fool the public. This source stated that the retreat of the BLM agents and the release of the cattle was actually crafted as a potential plan yesterday (Friday, 11 April 2014) based on the following:

1. A military assessment of satellite and drone surveillance imagery of the “patriot resistance. Drones under the control of the U.S. military were in use, taking real-time photographic images of not just the activity at the ranch, but "identifying the protesters, any arms and any supplies they might have or be carrying. “Mission accomplished.”
2. Real-time communication intercepts between patriots on-site and their off-site support;
3. Active monitoring of internet traffic regarding the coverage of events at ranch;
4. The monitoring of real-time video from the scene.

This source stated that a response by the patriot movement was anticipated, although exceeded their expectations. Although this was a real operation, they also ran this as a test case for future government operations once they saw the response. They were also actively managing the media, in some cases threatening to cut off White House access to anyone covering the event.

Despite this, the coverage by the alternative media began to create a public relations problem that was not easily managed. Note the lack of acknowledgment by the White House regarding this event. They are intentionally framing it as a state issue, despite the fact that all federal response has been and continues to be from the White House. There is a reason for this – a reason that has not been identified in any of the public reports to date. I will explain in further detail in a follow-up report on Sunday, after this source attends [redacted] to obtain more specific information about future federal operations. Regardless, according to this source, the government will take back ‘their land’ as they must to fulfill international obligations. It was never about grazing rights or anything other than (1) “securing clear title” to the land, and (2) further demonizing any patriotic resistance. It is my understanding, based on the information from this source, that it is a critical task to create a situation that will also advance their agenda of gun control and confiscation.

A more detailed report will follow on Sunday, 13 April 2014, with additional and much more specific information about their inside plans and future operations.PLEASE MAKE THIS VIRAL!
 
How did Daily Mail get this guy's name? Not good.

Firepower: Protester Eric Parker from central Idaho aims his weapon from a bridge next to the Bureau of Land Management's base camp where seized cattle
 
Oh...that sign...erk...<twitch>

This bothers my OCD way beyond reason.

OK, people, listen up once again!

In this, and most, contexts, you do NOT mean:

Marshall Law.

OBIT_WEAVER_t470.jpg


You mean THIS:

Martial Law

923074_10151463429718859_2120246264_n.jpg




 
Last edited:
So we should all still be planning to head up there with all the lead flingers we can carry right?
 
It's bullshit.

Not saying they won't come back, but if they are, that guy doesn't know anything about it.

Don't know. It rang of truth to me.
Didn't seem just a little "too easy"?

How many employees does DHS have? How many billions of rounds of ammo?
 
Don't know. It rang of truth to me.
Didn't seem just a little "too easy"?

How many employees does DHS have? How many billions of rounds of ammo?

They didn't expect armed resistance, and are clearly are not willing to die for a paycheck.
 
The feds didn't back down because of fear of getting shot, they backed down because a bloodbath in the desert over a few cows eating grass would have turned horrible bad for them and could have seen congressional action to curtail the feds power over land management. That is what they fear.
 
Back
Top