Are you voting for Gary Johnson? Explain your answer plz

[Jamesiv1]

You know, I disagree with r3v 3.0 on many things, including the idea that Johnson is any kind of a libertarian, but your constantly and disingenuously posting this crap about him in a transparent attempt at character assassination borders on malicious libel, and very likely violates the forum rules regarding harassing another member.

Since you've always been so big on pointing out when other violate guidelines, you might give that some thought.

Or you could keep behaving in the same reprehensible manner that you have been. Your choice.

You sir, are no lover of liberty.

 

[robmpreston]

You sir, are no lover of liberty.

You sir, are no lover of liberty.

 

[RonPaulGeorge&Ringo]

Johnson would appoint Supreme Court justices who adhered to an originalist interpretation of the U.S. Constitution.

Not according to co-President Weld. Weld says they will appoint people like Anthony Kennedy.

Johnson is not a "Birther".

What's that? Like a midwife? Do you have something against midwives?

Johnson would only deploy the U.S. military if there were a clear threat to national security

Has he renounced his support for invading Africa to overthrow Kony?

Johnson supports rescinding the passport requirement for US-Canada travel.

Does that mean he wants a NAFTA drivers' licence ID card instead? Or that anyone from anywhere in the world who happens to be in Canada can just come in to the US? Open border?

Johnson adheres to the Austrian School of economics

Cite?

 

[John F Kennedy III]

Who cares what you label him. He's not a crook and he is doing great things toward a viable third party. If that isn't good enough, I don't know what is.

He's authoritarian, that's enough for any libertarian to not vote for him.

 

[Champ]

I support GJ's effort to bring a voice to 3rd parties and making the LP a viable option in future elections. I think it goes without saying he has impaled himself on too many swords at this point for any serious libertarian to believe he is someone worth voting for with regard to libertarian principles.

I won't begrudge anyone that votes for him though and fully understand the rationale behind that course of action.

 

[Ender]

You know, I disagree with r3v 3.0 on many things, including the idea that Johnson is any kind of a libertarian, but your constantly and disingenuously posting this crap about him in a transparent attempt at character assassination borders on malicious libel, and very likely violates the forum rules regarding harassing another member.

Since you've always been so big on pointing out when other violate guidelines, you might give that some thought.

Or you could keep behaving in the same reprehensible manner that you have been. Your choice.

Agree- she follows him around and posts that image every chance she gets.

She -neg repped me today for calling her on her insults to others.

 

[CCTelander]

Agree- she follows him around and posts that image every chance she gets.

She -neg repped me today for calling her on her insults to others.

+rep to offset her neg.

 

[Influenza]

You know, I disagree with r3v 3.0 on many things, including the idea that Johnson is any kind of a libertarian, but your constantly and disingenuously posting this crap about him in a transparent attempt at character assassination borders on malicious libel, and very likely violates the forum rules regarding harassing another member.

Since you've always been so big on pointing out when other violate guidelines, you might give that some thought.

Or you could keep behaving in the same reprehensible manner that you have been. Your choice.

But where does it say in the guidelines that you can't say Ron Paul is a Hillary supporter? obligatory:

 

[Ender]

+rep to offset her neg.

Thanks! I tried to rep you for post #40 but I must spread some Reputation around before giving it to CCTelander again.

 

[69360]

He's authoritarian, that's enough for any libertarian to not vote for him.

You think Johnson is authoritarian? Really?

What are the other two then? Dictators? Overlords?

 

[John F Kennedy III]

You think Johnson is authoritarian? Really?

What are the other two then? Dictators? Overlords?

He supports smoking ban, forced vaccinations, carbon taxes, gun control, forcing business owners at gun point to serve people they don't want to serve. Yep GJ is authoritarian.

You are either libertarian or authoritarian. There is no middle ground.

 

[Ender]

+rep to offset her neg.

And now I was -neg repped by RonPaulGeorgeRingo for telling you I couldn't rep you.

He said "offtopic".

What a bunch of sweet haters we have on the forum. I must be very popular.

 

[CCTelander]

And now I was -neg repped by RonPaulGeorgeRingo for telling you I couldn't rep you.

He said "offtopic".

What a bunch of sweet haters we have on the forum. I must be very popular.

Haters gonna hate. I usually just ignore it and move on with my life. Living with their own attitudes is often worse than anything I could do to them anyway.

 

[Ender]

Haters gonna hate. I usually just ignore it and move on with my life. Living with their own attitudes is often worse than anything I could do to them anyway.

Tis true, tis sad; tis sad tis true.

 

[LibertyEagle]

You know, I disagree with r3v 3.0 on many things, including the idea that Johnson is any kind of a libertarian, but your constantly and disingenuously posting this crap about him

Oh, it's not disingenuous at all.

in a transparent attempt at character assassination borders on malicious libel, and very likely violates the forum rules regarding harassing another member.

How so? They are his own words and not taken out of context. If they were, you might have a point. But, they're not. Given that he appears to be attempting to tell others what libertarianism is, I do think it is germane to share with the reader what his worldview is. Because personally, I have never seen world government be a part of that. Have you?

Since you've always been so big on pointing out when other violate guidelines, you might give that some thought.

Or you could keep behaving in the same reprehensible manner that you have been. Your choice.

Feel free to flag my post if you'd like. But, since you mentioned the guidelines, you might want to read them again. I'm pretty sure the new and improved guidelines include citing guidelines to another forum member as a no-no.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Agree- she follows him around and posts that image every chance she gets.

Yeah, I'm just waiting for a good opportunity to post the image of you claiming that the Constitution is based off of something the Indians did.

She -neg repped me today for calling her on her insults to others.

Hhmm... are you sure that's an accurate depiction?

 

[Rad]

Most likely not but Hillary's campaign/supporters could influence me. Then Johnson could be the new Nader. He didn't support the Iran deal because he says Iran is the number #1 sponsor of terror.

 

[The Gold Standard]

I withdrew my consent for this shit show long ago. I won't be giving them the impression that I gave it back just to vote for Gary Johnson.

 

[Ender]

[MENTION=660]LibertyEagle[/MENTION]

Yeah, I'm just waiting for a good opportunity to post the image of you claiming that the Constitution is based off of something the Indians did.

http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/hconres331.pdf

 

[69360]

You are either libertarian or authoritarian. There is no middle ground.

That's crap. The world isn't black and white. People like you who think it is will never be effective.