Are we allowed to discuss race on this forum?

[PaleoConPrep]

Where does this forum stand on racial discussion? I'd like to disclose and discuss my position on race if it is allowed.

 

[presence]

We already know you're an elitist WASP racist homie. No need to raise flags.

 

[ifthenwouldi]

Not really a big fan of race. F1 is a bit more exciting than NASCAR, for sure, but I tend to get bored watching just about any race within 15 minutes.

 

[acptulsa]

Oh just fucking great.

If you think there's anything libertarian about judging individual books by their covers, you don't know enough about liberty to post on any libertarian forum.

If you want a platform for arguing that individuals should lose or be denied opportunities based on their race, you haven't found it. You are sabotaging the site's mission, and will be treated as such--by members, if not by the administration.

If you think you're only talking to white guys when you post here, and can post anything rude about non-white guys without insulting any established members, or if you think you won't be intellectually humiliated by people with a different melanin content, you're delusional and dense.

If you're looking for permission to spam the New Posts board with racist garbage so the whole media establishment can discredit every libertarian everywhere with one screenshot, you are our enemy, and will be treated as such.

If you're looking for an echo chamber--if you are looking to do anything but go down in flames--you are in the wrong place.

Why do you even think you want to go there on our board anyway? Is this enemy action? Are you a masochist? Are you too lazy to learn how libertarians place individual rights above all else by reading, and determined to learn it the hard way instead? Did you believe msnbc's bull about the newsletters, and honestly believe that smear campaign didn't leave us unjustly maligned, pissed and ready to repel any more bullshit from that same quarter?

Do you honestly think everyone here is just dying to see your opinion of racial matters? Or anyone at all?

Why do you even ask? Can you tell us why you want to go there without pissing us off?

Maybe you should search the archives first, and see if you can stand what you're asking to get. It ain't like you're the first person to come here and go there. Those who refuse to learn from this site's post history generally whine the loudest about repeating it.

 

[otherone]

Where does this forum stand on racial discussion? I'd like to disclose and discuss my position on race if it is allowed.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/content.php?1989

 

[PaleoConPrep]

Oh just $#@!ing great.

If you think there's anything libertarian about judging individual books by their covers, you don't know enough about liberty to post on any libertarian forum.

If you want a platform for arguing that individuals should lose or be denied opportunities based on their race, you haven't found it. You are sabotaging the site's mission, and will be treated as such--by members, if not by the administration.

If you think you're only talking to white guys when you post here, and can post anything rude about non-white guys without insulting any established members, or if you think you won't be intellectually humiliated by people with a different melanin content, you're delusional and dense.

If you're looking for permission to spam the New Posts board with racist garbage so the whole media establishment can discredit every libertarian everywhere with one screenshot, you are our enemy, and will be treated as such.

If you're looking for an echo chamber--if you are looking to do anything but go down in flames--you are in the wrong place.

Why do you even think you want to go there on our board anyway? Is this enemy action? Are you a masochist? Are you too lazy to learn how libertarians place individual rights above all else by reading, and determined to learn it the hard way instead? Did you believe msnbc's bull about the newsletters, and honestly believe that smear campaign didn't leave us unjustly maligned, pissed and ready to repel any more bull$#@! from that same quarter?

Why do you even ask?

Well first of all, I'm not a Libertarian. Second, I'm not looking to do ANY of the things that you listed. I am not a racist( although I may be if you agree with the modern definition of "racism" ) I think sites like Stormfront are a joke. Race isn't the be all, end all for me. I am STRONGLY against multiculturalism. I believe that a nation should be composed of one majority ethnicity and religion. Around 90%. ( notice I said "majority", not all.) I believe that Western culture is VASTLY superior to other cultures. I'm not afraid to call "Native Americans" savages.

 

[cajuncocoa]

Well first of all, I'm not a Libertarian. Second, I'm not looking to do ANY of the things that you listed. I am not a racist( although I may be if you agree with the modern definition of "racism" ) I think sites like Stormfront are a joke. Race isn't the be all, end all for me. I am STRONGLY against multiculturalism. I believe that a nation should be composed of one majority ethnicity and religion. Around 90%. ( notice I said "majority", not all.) I believe that Western culture is VASTLY superior to other cultures. I'm not afraid to call "Native Americans" savages.

You've already gone collectivist.

 

[acptulsa]

This forum is full of Constitutionalists, who cherish the nation's long history of not restricting movement of citizens among the states, so your desire to see a honkie enclave in these borders is completely counter to libertarianism and a slap in our faces. And your contention that American Indians are savages is not only a sure sign of your ignorance, it's an insult to respected and beloved senior members of this site.

Respected and beloved members, I should add, who are not here to savage this site and our reputations. Unlike certain people I could name.

 

[ArrestPoliticians]

No I don't think the watered-down Nazi ideology is welcome here

 

[acptulsa]

No I don't think the watered-down Nazi ideology is welcome here

Anyone who wants to fly in here under our radar and spam our forum with stuff we don't believe in order to discredit us is going to have to come up with a much more original approach than that.

I suggest you heed this officer-class troll and abandon this attack, paleononlibertariancaveman. Maybe you can still find a tenable position to fall back to, though I doubt it.

 

[MelissaWV]

Well first of all, I'm not a Libertarian. Second, I'm not looking to do ANY of the things that you listed. I am not a racist( although I may be if you agree with the modern definition of "racism" ) I think sites like Stormfront are a joke. Race isn't the be all, end all for me. I am STRONGLY against multiculturalism. I believe that a nation should be composed of one majority ethnicity and religion. Around 90%. ( notice I said "majority", not all.) I believe that Western culture is VASTLY superior to other cultures. I'm not afraid to call "Native Americans" savages.

There. You've expressed yourself. The world didn't end.

Now, the downside for you is that people are going to respond.

I'm going to assume that you count yourself among the "correct" majority ethnicity/religion for your country of residence. If it's the US, it's interesting that you view "Native Americans" (which is, if you delve beyond elementary school social studies, made up of a number of nations and cultural traditions even now, let alone centuries ago) with contempt. Technically, your forefathers would have been part of the invasion of an ethnicity/religion that countered their 90% in any given area at first, but let's set that aside.

How are you counting ethnicity and religion? It wasn't terribly long ago that allowing the Irish in was considered dreadful, and their evil Catholic ways were a threat. Irish need not apply, unless it was to die as fodder for Lincoln. Maybe it's the larger umbrella of Caucasian, but that would likely include a number of dangerous undesirables from your point of view.

Usually, if you pause and dig down under whatever you were going to say about race, you'll find there's a specific behavior or subset that is actually what's bothering you, which means there's a decent solution as well. The question is whether you're willing to dig.

 

[erowe1]

I'm not afraid to call "Native Americans" savages.

Why not?

And given this, I now have trouble seeing why you don't feel more at home at Stormfront.

 

[acptulsa]

Of course, it couldn't be because no one pays him to try to discredit storefront with his presence. Just couldn't possibly be.

 

[klamath]

Well first of all, I'm not a Libertarian. Second, I'm not looking to do ANY of the things that you listed. I am not a racist( although I may be if you agree with the modern definition of "racism" ) I think sites like Stormfront are a joke. Race isn't the be all, end all for me. I am STRONGLY against multiculturalism. I believe that a nation should be composed of one majority ethnicity and religion. Around 90%. ( notice I said "majority", not all.) I believe that Western culture is VASTLY superior to other cultures. I'm not afraid to call "Native Americans" savages.

That pretty much says it. Collectivist racism. "They are all savages".

 

[Bryan]

As noted, the community guidelines explain what is allowed; promoting any type of negative collectivist mindsets is the antithesis of our values. That said, having some discussions to explore your mindset without actually promoting anything can be of value for the purpose of improving thought processes for all who participate and read in this thread.

With that, could you please answer the following questions?

I believe that a nation should be composed of one majority ethnicity and religion. Around 90%. ( notice I said "majority", not all.)

Why? And for the sake of argument, how do you propose to achieve this? What if others don't agree? Let's say that you have a nation right at this 90% mark and some non-majorities types want to move in -then what? What if one of the 90% wants to bring in and marry a non-majority type - then what?

I believe that Western culture is VASTLY superior to other cultures.

For the sake of argument, why?

I'm not afraid to call "Native Americans" savages.

For the sake of argument, why do you view them as savages?

 

[tod evans]

Personally I could care less if he wants to discuss race.......

I don't have taboo subjects.

Could be I take umbrage with his positions, could be I don't.............Could be I don't care.

It's been my experience that nurture plays a much greater role than nature but whadda I know........

 

[Danke]

I'm not afraid to call "Native Americans" savages.

Not all, we have only had one banned here that I know of, the other one here is mostly civil. Just be careful if you ever trade with him.

 

[acptulsa]

And for the sake of argument...

Too late. His commanding officer already pulled the plug on this skirmish.

 

[erowe1]

Why? And for the sake of argument, how do you propose to achieve this?

One easy way to do it would be for him to designate his own home as the nation of which he speaks.

I have a feeling, though, that he wouldn't be satisfied with this, and that he imagines that he is a special person who has the right to dictate to others what the ethnic makeup of their homes/nations ought to be, and his not satisfied with just worrying about his own.

 

[LibertyEagle]

We already know you're an elitist WASP racist homie. No need to raise flags.

Thanks for letting us all know you are what you have tried to assign to him.