eduardo89
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2009
- Messages
- 21,295
I was happy when I heard the reasons Ron Paul does not support the death penalty anymore. He changed his mind for the same reason I did. After Illinois released so many condemned men from death row with DNA evidence they put a moratorium on the death penalty.
Since the reintroduction of the death penalty in 1976, less than 50 people have been exonerated from death row. Only 17 due to DNA evidence. Of course, that's 17 too many. An innocent man should never be put to death, but let's get the numbers right.
During this time I changed my stance on the death penalty. Poor people are more likely to get the death penalty. The fact that it takes 20 years to put someone to death does not make the threat of death a deterrent to crime. If it is not a deterrent then what is it? It is nothing but revenge carried out by the state for the sake of the victims family and it does not serve the people. I would be all for the death penalty in some cases if they carried it out in a timely fashion, like tomorrow at noon. Then it would have a deterrent affect. I say if the families of victims want someone dead they have to participate and throw the switch themselves.
I agree to some extent. I'm pro-death penalty. However, the way it's been applied I do not agree with, but I don't believe it's because of what the death penalty is. I think it's because the judicial system is completely broken. That needs to be fixed.
Last edited: