Lucille
Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2007
- Messages
- 15,019
How would you know if you're on a list?
I freely admit to living with my parents. They probably wouldn't like my dad either though, or one of my two brothers. My mom's honestly a bit naive on politcs and my 11 year old brother still has enough time for them to indoctrinate him, so they might leave those two alone...
Did you donate to Ron Paul during his '08 and/or '12 runs? Then you're on at least one. (Hope these suffice, runningdiz! LOL)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/14/homeland-security-report_n_186834.html
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...ual-liberty-as-extreme-right-wing-terrorists/
Also related:
http://fff.org/explore-freedom/article/terrorism-and-lexical-warfare/
Thus, a terrorist is a person with political, social or ideological goals that are both deeply held and highly critical of the U.S. government. He may use violence; he may not. The “peaceful terrorist” attempts to influence society in ways that others sometimes find intimidating; for example, he may insist on owning a gun. The terrorist is also “clandestine”; that is, he cleaves to privacy and resists surveillance.
The “peaceful terrorist” is a libertarian standing in the good company of others who dissent; for example, those who believe “freedom of speech” has a literal meaning.
Conclusion
The transformation of the word “terrorist” has shifted focus from the raw reality of state violence onto the mere possibility of individual violence, which is defined broadly enough to include dissent. In a stunning lexical victory, the police state has become the victim. Those who peacefully exercise their natural rights have become the terrorists.
No one should be surprised by revelations of the government’s massive surveillance of peaceful individuals. The surveillance should be everyone’s starting assumption.
Last edited: