Anyone tthink this is credible (next week economical big event)
- Thread starter hugolp
- Start date
I hope you're right. I mean- either he's really lucky and mad as a hatter or he actually knows something.
I want to laugh about it, though.
aravoth
Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2007
- Messages
- 2,933
Ehh... what exactly is there not to "buy" about it? You can see the cached pages and chached dates he made those statements. It's not like this is a BS story conjured up my manic conspiracy nerds. It's one guy, who called several things. And he didn't give a time frame, he gave the exact date, months in advance, and was right. You can read all the origional posts, just searching on google will bring it up.
Don't get me wrong, he was right about things he has said thus far, I sincerly hope and pray that he is wrong about next week, but judging by his/her track record, the odds are against me.
if he is right, that $100 might be worthless
ihsv
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2007
- Messages
- 2,932
Agent CSL
Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2008
- Messages
- 2,241
; - )
Fuck that. If reinhardt is right, Ill give him his $720 for a year subscription to his pay site. Ive recently started following him but I think his insights are spot on. He's able to pick through the garbage and see the truth. His hypothesis seems to be that Davos was mainly a cover for the upcoming "event", in conjunction with a Legatus meeting in the Caribbean recently. Whether you think its bunk, I wouldn't bet against him, thats for sure. And with BoA appearing very unstable these days, I wouldnt be surprised if BoA crashes on Monday. That'll send some serious shock waves through the system.
Razmear
Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2007
- Messages
- 4,023
This link was just added to the front of the enterprise corruption site:
http://www.wiredpirate.com/forum/index.php?sid=2c7365d4107896f605a17b0cf4fde365
It goes to a forum where this is all being discussed. You have to register to be able to see the boards.
--
Also I was going thru the cache of the site last night and there were a few disturbing images, one was a pic of a vehicle in the desert facing the camera with lots of black smoke in the background. Looking to me like they had just fled a disaster area prior to the bomb going off.
The caption was along the lines of 'that subscription sure was worth it'
Some on that forum are thinking along the lines of a second 9-11 type event for 2/9. other are just playing the market based on his advise.
Personally I have no cash to stock up or do any prep with at the moment, so I'll just sit it out and see what happens.
eb
http://www.wiredpirate.com/forum/index.php?sid=2c7365d4107896f605a17b0cf4fde365
It goes to a forum where this is all being discussed. You have to register to be able to see the boards.
--
Also I was going thru the cache of the site last night and there were a few disturbing images, one was a pic of a vehicle in the desert facing the camera with lots of black smoke in the background. Looking to me like they had just fled a disaster area prior to the bomb going off.
The caption was along the lines of 'that subscription sure was worth it'
Some on that forum are thinking along the lines of a second 9-11 type event for 2/9. other are just playing the market based on his advise.
Personally I have no cash to stock up or do any prep with at the moment, so I'll just sit it out and see what happens.
eb
Last edited:
Razmear
Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2007
- Messages
- 4,023
Another source if your digging on this:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread395831/pg50
This thread has over 50 pages of postings and many snips from "R"'s website. This was the first page where I saw 2/9/09 mentioned and it is from November.
Note: posting dates are in D/M/Y format, so your seeing November 2 not Feb 11, as it will appear at first glance.
eb
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread395831/pg50
This thread has over 50 pages of postings and many snips from "R"'s website. This was the first page where I saw 2/9/09 mentioned and it is from November.
Note: posting dates are in D/M/Y format, so your seeing November 2 not Feb 11, as it will appear at first glance.
eb
I definitely don't think it is all out collapse time yet, not even close really.
I think all the inflation from 4-8+ years of democratic majority and economic pressure to "do something" (party independent) will.
All the stuff from those sites is rampant conspiracy theory. No one on the internet is going to know, and I'm certainly far from convinced anyone in the government is smart or dedicated enough to pull anything large scale like fake terrorist attacks or planned global economic events. They are a bunch of greedy corrupt assholes, they make shady deals and support the people who pay for their elections ect.
I certainly believe international monetary fund/worldbank type institutions and the US/allied countries take over and ruin foreign economies like "Confessions of an economic hitman" type stuff. Just clever swindling on a large scale. We also know the CIA and even domestic intelligence agencies allied with members of gov are up to all kinds of super shady stuff. But they aren't out to intentionally kill people just get budget increases, more pay, more power ect. Aside from that I think AJ calling 9/11 was coincidence and much if not most of what he talks about (and those sites) is just pointless unverifiable speculation.. The gov lies to us all the time so it's not surprising, and I'm sure there is lots of stuff we don't know, but its the same type of dirt you would find on any local politician/senator/congressman.
This is pretty much RP's stance and I happen to agree completely.
I think all the inflation from 4-8+ years of democratic majority and economic pressure to "do something" (party independent) will.
All the stuff from those sites is rampant conspiracy theory. No one on the internet is going to know, and I'm certainly far from convinced anyone in the government is smart or dedicated enough to pull anything large scale like fake terrorist attacks or planned global economic events. They are a bunch of greedy corrupt assholes, they make shady deals and support the people who pay for their elections ect.
I certainly believe international monetary fund/worldbank type institutions and the US/allied countries take over and ruin foreign economies like "Confessions of an economic hitman" type stuff. Just clever swindling on a large scale. We also know the CIA and even domestic intelligence agencies allied with members of gov are up to all kinds of super shady stuff. But they aren't out to intentionally kill people just get budget increases, more pay, more power ect. Aside from that I think AJ calling 9/11 was coincidence and much if not most of what he talks about (and those sites) is just pointless unverifiable speculation.. The gov lies to us all the time so it's not surprising, and I'm sure there is lots of stuff we don't know, but its the same type of dirt you would find on any local politician/senator/congressman.
This is pretty much RP's stance and I happen to agree completely.
Last edited:
PeterSchiffVideos
Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 100
Does this CDO collapse talk come from that Reinhart guy?
Or is the CDO collapse talk what that FeverIAm guy thinks Reinhart was talking about?
Or is the CDO collapse talk what that FeverIAm guy thinks Reinhart was talking about?
PeterSchiffVideos
Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 100
If you go to google images and type in "Ave Maria, FL" it brings up images of the construction that FeverIAm couldn't find on GoogleEarth. It looks like a Catholic town that was built and finished in 2007. The town is small and built around a church that rests in the middle of a circular rd. Weird.
PeterSchiffVideos
Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 100
Will somebody explain in layman terms how these CDOs, CDSs, and SPVs work? I tried to draw it out on a piece of paper but I am confused.
From what I gather:
CDS = Credit Default Swap. A bet between two companies that a third company will default.
CDO = Collaterilized Debt Obligation. Something to do with Asset backed securities.
Synthetic CDO = a mix of the two above.
So somebody like JP Morgan sets up a front company in the cayman islands (which is called an SPV). A nonprofit or small town wants money. So JP Morgan loans the charity money, in return the charity signs a piece of paper that says they are now shareholders of the newly created SPV (although, they're not aware of it). JP Morgan does this like 100 times? Then bunches 100 SPVs together and that is what the Synthetic CDO is? And the Synthetic CDO basically acts like a normal CDS and is a bet that against what companies? How does this work? I'm lost.
From what I gather:
CDS = Credit Default Swap. A bet between two companies that a third company will default.
CDO = Collaterilized Debt Obligation. Something to do with Asset backed securities.
Synthetic CDO = a mix of the two above.
So somebody like JP Morgan sets up a front company in the cayman islands (which is called an SPV). A nonprofit or small town wants money. So JP Morgan loans the charity money, in return the charity signs a piece of paper that says they are now shareholders of the newly created SPV (although, they're not aware of it). JP Morgan does this like 100 times? Then bunches 100 SPVs together and that is what the Synthetic CDO is? And the Synthetic CDO basically acts like a normal CDS and is a bet that against what companies? How does this work? I'm lost.
SirFelix
Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Messages
- 36
I believe it might be true.
Youtube investigator
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Il1_A77OAIQ
Blogsite
http://www.wiredpirate.com/forum/index.php?sid=2c7365d4107896f605a17b0cf4fde365
Synopsis of risk
http://www.metafilter.com/77018/www.securitization.net/pdf/Nomura/CDO-CDS_12Sept05.pdf
Great article explaining CDOs
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/A-tsunami-of-hope-or-terror-LHRJP?OpenDocument
Great video explaining CDOs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb_R1-PqRrw
Youtube investigator
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Il1_A77OAIQ
Blogsite
http://www.wiredpirate.com/forum/index.php?sid=2c7365d4107896f605a17b0cf4fde365
Synopsis of risk
http://www.metafilter.com/77018/www.securitization.net/pdf/Nomura/CDO-CDS_12Sept05.pdf
Great article explaining CDOs
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/A-tsunami-of-hope-or-terror-LHRJP?OpenDocument
Great video explaining CDOs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb_R1-PqRrw
Cowlesy
Moderatorus Emeritus
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2007
- Messages
- 17,086
I don't think it is credible. Most synthetic CDOs have already been written down causing margin calls for those who purchased them on borrowed funds, and I have never heard of a random put option that says "If 9 companies out of "100's" default, you have to make the buyer whole".
Any mezzanine or junior debt securities on companies even with AA ratings are already trading at bottom-of-the-barrel prices. Even senior secured debt is trading at around 80 occasionally.
I'd be pretty surprised if this comes true.
Any mezzanine or junior debt securities on companies even with AA ratings are already trading at bottom-of-the-barrel prices. Even senior secured debt is trading at around 80 occasionally.
I'd be pretty surprised if this comes true.
Agent CSL
Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2008
- Messages
- 2,241
We'll see.
Anyone can see the truth. His truth has to do with the ages old conspiracy that the Catholic church controls the government, and that things are tied to certain events. There is no worrying here, not worth it.
newbitech
Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2007
- Messages
- 8,847
legatus
official who acted as a deputy general to governors of provinces conquered by ancient Rome in the 2nd and 1st centuries BC, during the period of the republic. In the latter part of the 1st century BC, Julius Caesar initiated the practice of appointing legates to command legions in the army. This practice became customary under the emperor Augustus (27 BC-AD 14). Under the early empire, in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD, a province containing one or more legions was governed by a military commander with the title legatus Augusti pro praetore (propraetorian legate of the emperor).
Piratic Flycatcher
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Legatus (bird))
Jump to: navigation, search
Piratic Flycatcher
Conservation status
Least Concern (IUCN 3.1)
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Order: Passeriformes
Family: Tyrannidae
Genus: Legatus
Sclater 1859
Species: L. leucophaius
Binomial name
Legatus leucophaius
(Vieillot, 1818)
The Piratic Flycatcher, Legatus leucophaius, is a passerine bird, the only member of the genus Legatus. It is a resident breeder from southern Mexico and Trinidad south to Bolivia and Argentina. At least some birds from Central America and Trinidad are migratory, and this species also visits Tobago.
This tyrant flycatcher is found in savannah and other semi-open habitat with large trees. It gets its name because it does not build its own nest, but appropriates the domed or enclosed nests of other, often far larger, bird species, such as Yellow-rumped Cacique or Crested Oropendola. Once the persistence of the flycatchers has driven the rightful owners away, their eggs are removed, and the female flycatcher lays up to four, but usually two, black-streaked brown eggs. She incubates these on her own for 16 days to hatching, with a further 18-20 days to fledging.
official who acted as a deputy general to governors of provinces conquered by ancient Rome in the 2nd and 1st centuries BC, during the period of the republic. In the latter part of the 1st century BC, Julius Caesar initiated the practice of appointing legates to command legions in the army. This practice became customary under the emperor Augustus (27 BC-AD 14). Under the early empire, in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD, a province containing one or more legions was governed by a military commander with the title legatus Augusti pro praetore (propraetorian legate of the emperor).
Piratic Flycatcher
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Legatus (bird))
Jump to: navigation, search
Piratic Flycatcher
Conservation status
Least Concern (IUCN 3.1)
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Order: Passeriformes
Family: Tyrannidae
Genus: Legatus
Sclater 1859
Species: L. leucophaius
Binomial name
Legatus leucophaius
(Vieillot, 1818)
The Piratic Flycatcher, Legatus leucophaius, is a passerine bird, the only member of the genus Legatus. It is a resident breeder from southern Mexico and Trinidad south to Bolivia and Argentina. At least some birds from Central America and Trinidad are migratory, and this species also visits Tobago.
This tyrant flycatcher is found in savannah and other semi-open habitat with large trees. It gets its name because it does not build its own nest, but appropriates the domed or enclosed nests of other, often far larger, bird species, such as Yellow-rumped Cacique or Crested Oropendola. Once the persistence of the flycatchers has driven the rightful owners away, their eggs are removed, and the female flycatcher lays up to four, but usually two, black-streaked brown eggs. She incubates these on her own for 16 days to hatching, with a further 18-20 days to fledging.
Last edited:
Similar threads
