"Another senseless and illegal Trump admin. rollback" : Lightbulbs

[H_H]

The new technology is supposed to last forever

Exactly, that's the biggest lie.

"Will last 20 years!"

And they know perfectly well when they invariably burn out in 2 years, no one will notice or call them on it.

Except for me.

 

[H_H]

But they're great for light sabers.

 

[shakey1]

Both technologies have their place... gimme the choice. Is that so difficult?

 

[shakey1]

Exactly, that's the biggest lie.

"Will last 20 years!"

And they know perfectly well when they invariably burn out in 2 years, no one will notice or call them on it.

Except for me.

Save yer receipt.

 

[Stratovarious]

Exactly, that's the biggest lie.

"Will last 20 years!"

And they know perfectly well when they invariably burn out in 2 years, no one will notice or call them on it.

Except for me.

The battery I my smart Jeep, didn't last two years , AGM magic technology.
rIgt...........

Those Rough Neck containers from Home Depot, lmao, biodegradable so if
you store anything important the rats will get if before you need it.
I had one completely disintegrate, you go to pick it up, its comes apart
in 10 0r 12 sq in chunks.....devolution, it's called smart, new, green.......

 

[Influenza]

Ha ha; our resident ultra progressive Democrat sympathizer with red herrings, apples-to-oranges, and all of that.

You know absolutely nothing about logic, why are you pretending? The claim I responded to was "There is nothing more dangerous than a fluorescent bulb." Did I not refute that idiotic claim?

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Did I not refute that idiotic claim?

No.

1. You didn't even get her quote right.
2. You were comparing different words (see point one).

 

[Influenza]

No.

1. You didn't even get her quote right.
2. You were comparing different words (see point one).

You are pitifully incapable of understanding the english language, a real shame given it's obviously the only language you know

"There is nothing more poisonous than a fluorescent bulb. Or dangerous. Or the apparatus to use them."

What can we determine to be euphemia's opinion based on this statement?
1. There is nothing more poisonous than a fluorescent bulb. - Even if a fluorescent bulb was pure mercury, it would not be the most poisonous substance https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200006153422405 This woman survived injecting 135g of mercury into her bloodstream. There are about 4 mg of mercury in a bulb. If you aren't eating fluorescent bulbs for breakfast, I'm sure you will be just fine.
2. There is nothing more dangerous than a fluorescent bulb. - I already addressed how retarded this is. The broken glass is more of a danger than the mercury inside of it
3. The apparatus to use them is also extremely dangerous. (euphemia has trouble changing lightbulbs??)

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

You are pitifully incapable of understanding the english language,...

That's funny coming from someone who doesn't know the difference between poison, death, danger, and injuries. You might want to first define those words before illogically comparing them.

.... a real shame given it's obviously the only language you know

You also might want to work on some basic facts.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

What can we determine....

Yes, what can we determine? You are an ultra progressive here, so what is your opinion of light bulb and other utility type regulation? What is your opinion of the article?