Anonymous releases name of police officer who shot Mike Brown

[JK/SEA]

Yes, he just decided to kill him because he's sadistic. Gimme a break. Contempt by cop. Tell it to the clerk that was ragdolled.

as was said before. Mr. Wilson took care of it. Saved the taxpayers money for a trial.....but...how much did that riot cost again?...well worth it eh?

 

[invisible]

Which is why the autopsy report is so important. I feel they need to go ahead and release it. I see no need to hold it pending a toxicology report.

The need for the toxicology report is to be able to do as complete of a smear job on the victim as possible. If they can claim that the victim was "on drugs", then they will claim that the murder was justified because of the victim's "drug-induced rage". No good internal investigation whitewash is complete without claiming that the victim was "on drugs", and that the cop "feared for his safety".

 

[thoughtomator]

Yes, he just decided to kill him because he's sadistic. Gimme a break. Contempt by cop. Tell it to the clerk that was ragdolled after Big Mike robbed his store.

What world are you living in?

 

[phill4paul]

Note that the government has refused to release the autopsy report (which I suspect will show the witnesses are telling the truth).

RPF challenge: can anyone name a legitimate reason not to release that report?

The release is pending a toxicology report. That way when it is presented it will say "x" was in the deceased system. As in "See he was a drug user. Therefore, he wasn't simply a bad guy he was a very, very, very bad guy."

 

[AuH20]

The need for the toxicology report is to be able to do as complete of a smear job on the victim as possible. If they can claim that the victim was "on drugs", then they will claim that the murder was justified because of the victim's "drug-induced rage". No good internal investigation whitewash is complete without claiming that the victim was "on drugs", and that the cop "feared for his safety".

Forget about the toxicology report. They have the guy on freaking tape. Positive ID. Same clothes. Same Cardinals hat.

 

[AuH20]

as was said before. Mr. Wilson took care of it. Saved the taxpayers money for a trial.....but...how much did that riot cost again?...well worth it eh?

I wouldn't go that far. But it's never black and white. The world is very much gray. Bad cop and good black kid does not exist or the reverse. We need to analyze outside our preconceived biases and use logic. This kid was a thug and it's possible that this police officer utilized excessive force when confronted with this man mountain.

 

[invisible]

Yes, he just decided to kill him because he's sadistic. Gimme a break. Contempt by cop. Tell it to the clerk that was ragdolled after Big Mike robbed his store. What's the old saying? Do stupid things and win stupid prizes?

You don't feel that cops are sadistic? Why don't you read about what happened to those reporters from the Washington Post and Huffington Post? What did they do to win their little prizes? From pretty much all of my experiences with and observations of cops, being sadistic is pretty much a necessary qualification for the job.

 

[invisible]

Yes, he just decided to kill him because he's sadistic. Gimme a break. Contempt by cop. Tell it to the clerk that was ragdolled after Big Mike robbed his store. What's the old saying? Do stupid things and win stupid prizes?

You don't feel that cops are sadistic? Why don't you read about what happened to those reporters from the Washington Post and Huffington Post? What did they do to win their little prizes? From pretty much all of my experiences with and observations of cops, being sadistic is pretty much a necessary qualification for the job.

 

[phill4paul]

Forget about the toxicology report. They have the guy on freaking tape. Positive ID. Same clothes. Same Cardinals hat.

Assaulting the cop? Please link that video.

 

[PaulConventionWV]

Yes, irrelevant to the question at hand. One minute you're throwing around convenience store clerks and the next minute your a docile specimen after the police stops you for questioning about the very same incident. No fight or flight response triggered. Completely believable.

Where is this store clerk now? Has he spoken out?

 

[thoughtomator]

Forget about the toxicology report. They have the guy on freaking tape. Positive ID. Same clothes. Same Cardinals hat.

What part of "even if he is a thief and was being chased down, killing him is not a lawful option" doesn't compute with you?

Even the worst people have inalienable rights. If they don't have those rights, neither do you. Try to come to grips with this.

 

[AuH20]

You don't feel that cops are sadistic? Why don't you read about what happened to those reporters from the Washington Post and Huffington Post? What did they do to win their little prizes? From pretty much all of my experiences with and observations of cops, being sadistic is pretty much a necessary qualification for the job.

Some are but you can't just blindly associate all cops as being sadistic.

 

[AuH20]

What part of "even if he is a thief and was being chased down, killing him is not a lawful option" doesn't compute with you?

Even the worst people have inalienable rights. If they don't have those rights, neither do you. Try to come to grips with this.

Where am I differing with you? I want to know what happened in the struggle and if the cop is indeed liable for excessive force he should prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

 

[invisible]

Some are but you can't just blindly associate all cops as being sadistic.

Yeah, it's just those very few bad apples that we hear about, and we never hear about all the good ones. Right?

 

[tod evans]

I don't know about that. You think this cop would have just vigorously questioned the two walking home for shit and giggles? And then the excessive reaction by Brown (with the door flying back)? I knew something smelled fishy when the moment this case came out and all the rabid cop haters swallowed the shiny lure.

My distrust of kops and my belief that they'll all lie and distort reality in order to keep sucking the tit doesn't equate to "hate".

Dispise or loath would be far more appropriate...

That said I haven't seen any justification for a street execution yet.

 

[AuH20]

My distrust of kops and my belief that they'll all lie and distort reality in order to keep sucking the tit doesn't equate to "hate".

Dispise or loath would be far more appropriate...

That said I haven't seen any justification for a street execution yet.

I don't like police either but I'm not going to incriminate them at a moment's notice without a full analysis.

 

[Cleaner44]

Even if he assaulted the officer and attempted to take his sidearm? He's already on surveillance video beating up a clerk. At best, you can bring up the cop on manslaughter for excessive force if this did indeed happen.

Nonsense. Shooting an unarmed person that is 20-30 feet away is not justifiable regardless of what crime they are suspected of committing earlier. You can't make the case that the officer was in fear for his life. There was no reason to shoot him over and over and over again. If he was there to make an arrest for a suspected robbery down the street, the officer went about it extremely poorly. There is nothing that the cop did that you could characterize as proper procedure. He killed someone that was unarmed and surrendering. If I did this in the military it would be a war crime.

 

[thoughtomator]

Where am I differing with you? I want to know what happened in the struggle and if the cop is indeed liable for excessive force he should prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Multiple eyewitnesses testify to events that describe an assault and murder of the victim.

Only the police - who took most of a week to come up with their version of events - say otherwise.

We have a dead body that is very likely to have bullet holes in his back (and how many will be an interesting number) and the PD is deliberately withholding that information pending an additional report that has no actual relevance to the crime.

Take another read of the Washington Post article for additional character references for this PD. We even got the classic "stop resisting! stop resisting!" in there. And take a look at the video of the cops deliberately tear gassing a film crew (which constitutes a major felony, by the way).

So let's shift a moment. We have video evidence of a completely unprovoked tear gassing of a news crew. There were no rioters or any other people anywhere near this film crew and the tear gas was clearly deliberately shot right at them. This is more criminal behavior and information censorship from the very folks whose word you are relying on.

If I shot a tear gas cannister at a bunch of innocent people, I'd be up on terrorism charges. And yet no one even breathes a word about criminal charges against those who physically assaulted and kidnapped journalists.

Stop buying into that there can be one law for cops and another law for everyone else. That situation is not compatible with the Rule of Law - that situation is a military occupation. And if there's no Rule of Law, from where does a cop get his authority?

 

[tod evans]

I don't like police either but I'm not going to incriminate them at a moment's notice without a full analysis.

Please point to where I have done so....

Best I can recall I scream to defund the bastards, both sides.

I don't believe a word out of a kops mouth without supporting video, but that can in no way be construed as incrimination.

 

[AuH20]

Multiple eyewitnesses testify to events that describe an assault and murder of the victim.

Only the police - who took most of a week to come up with their version of events - say otherwise.

We have a dead body that is very likely to have bullet holes in his back (and how many will be an interesting number) and the PD is deliberately withholding that information pending an additional report that has no actual relevance to the crime.

Take another read of the Washington Post article for additional character references for this PD. We even got the classic "stop resisting! stop resisting!" in there. And take a look at the video of the cops deliberately tear gassing a film crew (which constitutes a major felony, by the way).

So let's shift a moment. We have video evidence of a completely unprovoked tear gassing of a news crew. There were no rioters or any other people anywhere near this film crew and the tear gas was clearly deliberately shot right at them. This is more criminal behavior and information censorship from the very folks whose word you are relying on.

If I shot a tear gas cannister at a bunch of innocent people, I'd be up on terrorism charges. And yet no one even breathes a word about criminal charges against those who physically assaulted and kidnapped journalists.

Stop buying into that there can be one law for cops and another law for everyone else. That situation is not compatible with the Rule of Law - that situation is a military occupation. And if there's no Rule of Law, from where does a cop get his authority?

Where I am justifying the excessive police response? I'm just stating that Michael Brown wasn't an innocent victim in all this like originally reported. If he didn't beat up a clerk, rob a few boxes of cigarillos AND then engage an officer, he'd probably still be alive. No one wants to focus on the stupidity of Brown. He's a goddamn retard for putting himself in that situation. That's like me going up to a police officer and spitting in his face. What do you think is going to happen? I'm probably going to get a hickory shampoo.