Anonymous releases name of police officer who shot Mike Brown

They've concocted their story...:mad:

I don't know about that. You think this cop would have just vigorously questioned the two walking home for shit and giggles? And then the excessive reaction by Brown (with the door flying back)? I knew something smelled fishy when the moment this case came out and all the rabid cop haters swallowed the shiny lure.
 
Last edited:
I don't know about that. You think this cop would have just vigorously questioned the two walking home for shit and giggles? And then the excessive reaction by Brown (with the door flying back)? I knew something smelled fishy when the moment this case came out and all the rabid cop haters swallowed the shiny lure.

The fact remains that Micheal Brown was unarmed.
 
Ding dong the witch is dead. Here is our lovable giant giving the QT clerk some love. Note the large hand around neck in a welcoming fashion:

BvFZ9xgIIAAgCZW.jpg
 
Last edited:
The fact remains that Micheal Brown was unarmed.

The policeman in question deserves manslaughter then. But it sounds like this fine upstanding member of the community went into a bezerker rage when questioned by the police officer after his little incident.
 
How many people feel fooled right about now?

BvFZjhvIgAEVyHJ.jpg


And there is the secondary suspect, the key witness Dorian Johnson.
 
Last edited:
don't care. He's had his day 'in court' and executed for being a young dickhead. Happy now?

I'm not happy that he's dead but people need to utilize common sense when examining these cases. White officer is not going to execute a black man in broad daylight in a black neighborhood simply because he's bored.
 
I don't know about that. You think this cop would have just vigorously questioned the two walking home for shit and giggles? And then the excessive reaction by Brown (with the door flying back)? I knew something smelled fishy when the moment this case came out and all the rabid cop haters swallowed the shiny lure.

Even if everything the police currently claim is 100% true, this is still a murder case.

There is no law that allows police to gun down a citizen, crime suspect or not.

And I should add, I don't believe the new police story at all, and no rational person should believe it. If it were the case that the officer approached the two men to question them about a robbery, why didn't they say so on Day 1? This has all the hallmarks of an after-the-fact coverup, including character assassination of the victim.

Let's again make that clear for the record: even if the victim was a horrible person, Adolph Hitler come to life again as a young black man, this is still a murder-2 case, minimum.
 
Even if everything the police currently claim is 100% true, this is still a murder case.

There is no law that allows police to gun down a citizen, crime suspect or not.

And I should add, I don't believe the new police story at all, and no rational person should believe it. If it were the case that the officer approached the two men to question them about a robbery, why didn't they say so on Day 1? This has all the hallmarks of an after-the-fact coverup, including character assassination of the victim.

Let's again make that clear for the record: even if the victim was a horrible person, Adolph Hitler come to life again as a young black man, this is still a murder-2 case, minimum.

Even if he assaulted the officer and attempted to take his sidearm? He's already on surveillance video beating up a clerk. At best, you can bring up the cop on manslaughter for excessive force if this did indeed happen.
 
I'm not happy that he's dead but people need to utilize common sense when examining these cases. White officer is not going to execute a black man in broad daylight in a black neighborhood simply because he's bored.

you sure about that?...i'm not, but carry on.
 
Even if he assaulted the officer and attempted to take his sidearm? He's already on surveillance video beating up a clerk. At best, you can bring up the cop on manslaughter for excessive force if this did indeed happen.

Which is why the autopsy report is so important. I feel they need to go ahead and release it. I see no need to hold it pending a toxicology report.
 
Even if he assaulted the officer and attempted to take his sidearm? He's already on surveillance video beating up a clerk. At best, you can bring up the cop on manslaughter for excessive force if this did indeed happen.

There is absolutely zero evidence he did anything of the sort. All witnesses contradict the police claim, and curiously a PD that has the resources to build a paramilitary army can't afford $50 dash cams, even though one of the primary functions of police is to collect evidence of crimes.

After all the evidence we have compiled of out-of-control police departments and police perjury rings and additional forms organized criminal activity in PDs across the nation, I am having trouble grappling with someone who still takes a cop's claim at face value, especially in the context of the blanket censorship and suppression immediately engaged in by the PD in the aftermath, a reaction so inappropriately extreme that the state's governor took them off the beat.

What's it take to get through to you that cops cannot lawfully gun people down in the street?
 
Which is why the autopsy report is so important. I feel they need to go ahead and release it. I see no need to hold it pending a toxicology report.

Note that the government has refused to release the autopsy report (which I suspect will show the witnesses are telling the truth).

RPF challenge: can anyone name a legitimate reason not to release that report?
 
I'm not happy that he's dead but people need to utilize common sense when examining these cases. White officer is not going to execute a black man in broad daylight in a black neighborhood simply because he's bored.

No, no, of course not. He's going to do it because he's a sick sadistic son of a bitch and he thinks he can get away with it.
 
Note that the government has refused to release the autopsy report (which I suspect will show the witnesses are telling the truth).

RPF challenge: can anyone name a legitimate reason not to release that report?

they are buying time. Time to formulate a 'plan' to deal with the next riot.
 
No, no, of course not. He's going to do it because he's a sick sadistic son of a bitch and he thinks he can get away with it.

Yes, he just decided to kill him because he's sadistic. Gimme a break. Contempt by cop. Tell it to the clerk that was ragdolled after Big Mike robbed his store. What's the old saying? Do stupid things and win stupid prizes?
 
Last edited:
That's irrelevant. You should know better.

Yes, irrelevant to the question at hand. One minute you're throwing around convenience store clerks and the next minute your a docile specimen after the police stops you for questioning about the very same incident. No fight or flight response triggered. Completely believable.
 
Back
Top