Angelatc, Kathy88

amy31416 said:
I'd say the same about you. The only reason I'm responding to you is because I started this thread and these are two people that I like.

If you left, I wouldn't start a thread asking about you, and I'm sure you feel the same about me. No problem--don't understand why you're even bothering to comment here.
Click to expand...

I suppose I can see why you would think that. I do tend to argue my point rather aggressively, the difference being that I have a lot more tact and I've never called for the death of anyone's children. I also don't run away from arguments like she does. I guess the real reason I commented is because I'm curious about what redeeming qualities people think she has.
 
Bryan said:
Let's keep it civil everyone....
Click to expand...

Sorry. Tough when someone's trodding on a "concern" thread and trying to disparage someone who's actually been involved in the movement in a very productive way.

Angela didn't complain, bitch or moan when her husband became direly ill. She didn't take welfare. She stuck by him and her family. She's an excellent person who uses her brains, she is human and she will sometimes gripe at people--but she is totally legit, and she is a really decent person.

And I do miss her posting here.
 
amy31416 said:
What's the point? I think you have a low IQ, are a hypocrite and froth at the mouth when you talk. That's based on several years of your postings. Just stay out of this thread if you hate Angela. Get a little self control. This is my last response to you.
Click to expand...

That is absurd. I've never even directly accused anyone of being stupid on here except for the American public at large. Anyone can tell from my use of language that I don't have a low IQ. Most people who visit internet fora, contrary to popular opinion, are of above average intelligence. Maybe my lust for debate makes me come off as abrasive, but I'm not stupid and I don't call people names.
 
amy31416 said:
Sorry. Tough when someone's trodding on a "concern" thread and trying to disparage someone who's actually been involved in the movement in a very productive way.

Angela didn't complain, bitch or moan when her husband became direly ill. She didn't take welfare. She stuck by him and her family. She's an excellent person who uses her brains, she is human and she will sometimes gripe at people--but she is totally legit, and she is a really decent person.

And I do miss her posting here.
Click to expand...

Ok, I get it. She helped the movement. I just didn't know about that part because I hadn't paid much attention to her until I saw how she could act after the campaign was over.

And admittedly, I've never endeavored to do much for the cause because I feel it's a bit hopeless now, but I did go to my state convention as a delegate and I did campaign for Ron Paul in Iowa. Other than that, I can be a bit apathetic.

But I'm not stupid.
 
AngelaTC is the only person here who gave me both + reps and - reps. About 6 plus and maybe 4 minus. Seems the split was between lice threads and vaccine threads. Oh well; some fun conversations in there.
 
NorthCarolinaLiberty said:
AngelaTC is the only person here who gave me both + reps and - reps. About 6 plus and maybe 4 minus. Seems the split was between lice threads and vaccine threads. Oh well; some fun conversations in there.
Click to expand...

Real Women . I would be doing good if my Rep was better than half with Mrs Oyarde, LOL,worst case I can let her read Danke's posts and that should immediately move me to 75 % to the good , :)
 
I really only disagree with angelatc on a couple of things. She's a tough old bird alright. Is what it is. I'll tell you a story. You could have a disagreement with her on something and turn it into 50 thousand hits in very little time and have 20 or so web pages/organizers synced up with regard to that issue and it's like releasing a swarm of trained bees into the wild. And there is a lot to say about that. Disagreements (the critical ones of our time) are too often never known and subsequently never discussed in a public way. And so when they are (and most often through disagreement) it's desirable. Disagreement is often the only means of such topics of discussion to ever have any kind of platform. Most times when we have a vested interest in not discussing something, we tend to ignore it all together. Which is unfortunate in scope. Disagreement voids that particular phenomenon.

Is truly a shame about katty88's situation. Returning to things that are meaningful is most often the best medicine and I do wish her and her family the best considering what is in the rear view mirror.
 
I see both of their posts on FB, and they seem to be living real lives at the moment. That's a good thing. I have also, to some extent, for now.

edit: I think you'll see them here more nearing 2016.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Granddaughter Lemonade Wyoming
Replies
3
Views
55
Anti Globalist
Anti Globalist
J
Charlie Kirk Asked If Israeli Government Gave “Stand-Down” Order Allowing 10/7 Attack Before He Was Hit
Replies
6
Views
103
acptulsa
acptulsa
PAF
There Is No Difference Between Compulsory Schooling and Compulsory Religion Laws
Replies
5
Views
331
mrsat_98
M
PAF
The “Libertarians” Who Say the Private Sector Is the Real Threat to Freedom
Replies
1
Views
88
TheTexan
TheTexan
jmdrake
Ghislaine Maxwell clears Trump, Clinton and all the other elites.
Replies
15
Views
346
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Back
Top