Prove it. This is speculation.
Obama's been ALL OVER the news. Why do you think he's gained so much ground on Hillary?
I have proven it with the links provided in the original post. More exposure for Dr. Paul can be gained - IF AND ONLY IF - we recognize the opportunity and push it forward.
Wow. Another 'mods please delete this thread request' - AFRAID OF CRITICAL THINKING on this forum?
Did I hurl an invective at anybody? Did I not back up my assertions with links to news and video? What are you afraid of?
The truth?
I have proven it with the links provided in the original post. More exposure for Dr. Paul can be gained - IF AND ONLY IF - we recognize the opportunity and push it forward.
Wow. Another 'mods please delete this thread request' - AFRAID OF CRITICAL THINKING on this forum?
Did I hurl an invective at anybody? Did I not back up my assertions with links to news and video? What are you afraid of?
The truth?
I looked at your "references" and they prove next to nothing.
Find something more substantive or don't waste my, and others' time with this absurdity.
What 'substantive' proof are you looking for?
I don't think you are looking for substantive proof.
You are just offering objections.
I watched both videos again. And they prove nothing.
You offer a hypothesis, you should be willing to provide sources to back it up. If it can't be tested, the hypothesis fails.
Your theory cannot be tested. It failed.
Official Ron Paul HQ and Grassroots Leaders listen up!
We libertarians are NOT racist. However based on the sudden and simultaneous decision by the media per links below:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=121139
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ec4OL34Txys
http://video.on.nytimes.com/?fr_story=8cf689588ac9e279703e54bbf8173c7897dab4cc
The media blackout on Dr. Paul HAS ENDED. Dr. Paul is NOW the 'media darling' because the leading contender for the '08 Presidency - Obama - is black.
This sad and racist decision by the uppermost echelons of the mainstream media to bring Dr. Paul again to the public eye has definitely been made.
The MSM owners want a white president - and they see Dr. Paul as the ONLY contender capable of defeating Obama in November, that is why they are pushing Dr. Paul on television.
I do suggest we take full advantage of this. Any ideas?
Wow. So if a theory cannot be tested, it automatically fails?
yes, actualy.
I watched both videos again. And they prove nothing.
You offer a hypothesis, you should be willing to provide sources to back it up. If it can't be tested, the hypothesis fails.
Your theory cannot be tested. It failed.
So the world is flat?
And going back to the gold standard is wrong?
Why am I replying to these questions?!?
Time to get some work done. This is so pathetic its not even funny.
I wouldn't know. I never turn my TV on.
Learn to take advantage of every opportunity.
Remember the 'Art of War':
In many battles you oftentimes find that you do NOT have the MEANS to win.
But when the opponent himself GIVES you the opportunity to win, TAKE FULL ADVANTAGE OF IT immediately.
The way the responses are going here and now on this thread, I see fatalistic responses/expectations regarding Dr. Paul's chances of success - and not much open mindedness regarding opportunities moving forward. Pathetic. Really.
Accept your fate - or shape your future? Your choice.
Opportunities exist - IF you can recognize them and exploit them.
This is a brilliant observation.
From my personal learning curve, and I've posted this before, some, me included, spent too much time trying to get the national media to notice us rather than thinking outside the box and taking advantage of what was right there in front of our eyes, specifically, local media outlets and Becoming the Media ourselves, complete with a press secretary as a local point of contact "official" for the campaign and blasting every local media outlet possible with press releases for any and every little thing. Finding a good media contact and wining and dining them to get attention "ain't all bad" either.
Even so, there's only so much the grassroots can do and I believe HQ should really ride the wave of the active duty military donations by having rallies close to or on military bases everywhere (never let an opportunity pass by), or doing speeches on aircraft carriers and such. Heck, a junket to Iraq wouldn't be out of line either. All the other candidates whore themselves out like this--why can't the one who actually does support the troops do the same??