Analysis: Media is NOW pushing Dr. Paul because he is NOT black.

Oh boy.

So they hadn't noticed till now that their lover boy is black?

6 years ago when they started pushing him as futer president they knew he was black.
 
Prove it. This is speculation.

Obama's been ALL OVER the news. Why do you think he's gained so much ground on Hillary?

I have proven it with the links provided in the original post. More exposure for Dr. Paul can be gained - IF AND ONLY IF - we recognize the opportunity and push it forward.

Wow. Another 'mods please delete this thread request' - AFRAID OF CRITICAL THINKING on this forum?

Did I hurl an invective at anybody? Did I not back up my assertions with links to news and video? What are you afraid of?

The truth?
 
I have proven it with the links provided in the original post. More exposure for Dr. Paul can be gained - IF AND ONLY IF - we recognize the opportunity and push it forward.

Wow. Another 'mods please delete this thread request' - AFRAID OF CRITICAL THINKING on this forum?

Did I hurl an invective at anybody? Did I not back up my assertions with links to news and video? What are you afraid of?

The truth?

I looked at your "references" and they prove next to nothing.

Find something more substantive or don't waste my, and others' time with this absurdity.
 
I have proven it with the links provided in the original post. More exposure for Dr. Paul can be gained - IF AND ONLY IF - we recognize the opportunity and push it forward.

Wow. Another 'mods please delete this thread request' - AFRAID OF CRITICAL THINKING on this forum?

Did I hurl an invective at anybody? Did I not back up my assertions with links to news and video? What are you afraid of?

The truth?

Can you please point out the proof for us slower folks. I don't see anything that says he's getting more attention because he's not black.
 
I looked at your "references" and they prove next to nothing.

Find something more substantive or don't waste my, and others' time with this absurdity.

What 'substantive' proof are you looking for?

I don't think you are looking for substantive proof.

You are just offering objections.
 
What 'substantive' proof are you looking for?

I don't think you are looking for substantive proof.

You are just offering objections.

I watched both videos again. And they prove nothing.

You offer a hypothesis, you should be willing to provide sources to back it up. If it can't be tested, the hypothesis fails.

Your theory cannot be tested. It failed.
 
You have to understand how the Media works. They already shut Ron Paul up. The dirty work is over.

They dont care which top tier candidate wins. All the guys they were rooting for made it to the final round. I guess i should say hand picked. Its all about ratings now. They want the race as close as possible so it drags on forever. But when the time comes they will announce the anointed one.
 
Last edited:
I watched both videos again. And they prove nothing.

You offer a hypothesis, you should be willing to provide sources to back it up. If it can't be tested, the hypothesis fails.

Your theory cannot be tested. It failed.

Wow. So if a theory cannot be tested, it automatically fails?
 
Official Ron Paul HQ and Grassroots Leaders listen up!

We libertarians are NOT racist. However based on the sudden and simultaneous decision by the media per links below:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=121139

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ec4OL34Txys

http://video.on.nytimes.com/?fr_story=8cf689588ac9e279703e54bbf8173c7897dab4cc

The media blackout on Dr. Paul HAS ENDED. Dr. Paul is NOW the 'media darling' because the leading contender for the '08 Presidency - Obama - is black.

This sad and racist decision by the uppermost echelons of the mainstream media to bring Dr. Paul again to the public eye has definitely been made.

The MSM owners want a white president - and they see Dr. Paul as the ONLY contender capable of defeating Obama in November, that is why they are pushing Dr. Paul on television.

I do suggest we take full advantage of this. Any ideas?

Question did you even watch the follow up to the NY times video? The lady voted for Mccain. BTW the NY times openly endorses Mccain.
 
Last edited:
I watched both videos again. And they prove nothing.

You offer a hypothesis, you should be willing to provide sources to back it up. If it can't be tested, the hypothesis fails.

Your theory cannot be tested. It failed.

Drum roll and cymbal crash followup.

:D

Randy
 
So the world is flat?

And going back to the gold standard is wrong?

Why am I replying to these questions?!? :rolleyes:

Time to get some work done. This is so pathetic its not even funny.

a.) nope, we've both circumnavigated AND orbited the Earth, to prove it's shape is not flat.
b.) nope, history of economies on gold standard vs economies on a paper standard is clear and well documented.

If you wanna nail me with an untestable theory, go for String Theory... but I tend to disbelieve string theory as well, so :D
 
Learn to take advantage of every opportunity.

Remember the 'Art of War':

In many battles you oftentimes find that you do NOT have the MEANS to win.

But when the opponent himself GIVES you the opportunity to win, TAKE FULL ADVANTAGE OF IT immediately.

The way the responses are going here and now on this thread, I see fatalistic responses/expectations regarding Dr. Paul's chances of success - and not much open mindedness regarding opportunities moving forward. Pathetic. Really.

Accept your fate - or shape your future? Your choice.

Opportunities exist - IF you can recognize them and exploit them.

This is a brilliant observation.

From my personal learning curve, and I've posted this before, some, me included, spent too much time trying to get the national media to notice us rather than thinking outside the box and taking advantage of what was right there in front of our eyes, specifically, local media outlets and Becoming the Media ourselves, complete with a press secretary as a local point of contact "official" for the campaign and blasting every local media outlet possible with press releases for any and every little thing. Finding a good media contact and wining and dining them to get attention "ain't all bad" either.

Even so, there's only so much the grassroots can do and I believe HQ should really ride the wave of the active duty military donations by having rallies close to or on military bases everywhere (never let an opportunity pass by), or doing speeches on aircraft carriers and such. Heck, a junket to Iraq wouldn't be out of line either. All the other candidates whore themselves out like this--why can't the one who actually does support the troops do the same??
 
So what I figured out from these videos is that Ron Paul gets more donations from the troops then anyone, and that Ron Paul is a man of principle and integrity... a message deemed worthy only of online video status.....

They gave Ron Paul 3 Minutes... good god, do you realize that the last time they said his name was when Wolf Blitzer said 'oh and Ron Paul is still in it at 11% in Kansas'


Blackout lifted? Absolutely NOT.
 
This is a brilliant observation.

From my personal learning curve, and I've posted this before, some, me included, spent too much time trying to get the national media to notice us rather than thinking outside the box and taking advantage of what was right there in front of our eyes, specifically, local media outlets and Becoming the Media ourselves, complete with a press secretary as a local point of contact "official" for the campaign and blasting every local media outlet possible with press releases for any and every little thing. Finding a good media contact and wining and dining them to get attention "ain't all bad" either.

Even so, there's only so much the grassroots can do and I believe HQ should really ride the wave of the active duty military donations by having rallies close to or on military bases everywhere (never let an opportunity pass by), or doing speeches on aircraft carriers and such. Heck, a junket to Iraq wouldn't be out of line either. All the other candidates whore themselves out like this--why can't the one who actually does support the troops do the same??

THANK YOU! Your Iraq junket trip idea for Dr. Paul may just turn this ship around!

My question is: I flagged what was going wrong in the RP campaign even before Iowa and was even branded a troll - but I was spot on every time.

Now that I am flagging what is going right for the RP campaign, people here don't want recognize it and take advantage of it?

All I am saying now is: If Dr. Paul has anything truly news worthy today, it WILL get airtime.

The media wants to play up the 'last white hope' angle.

It is a racist angle by the media, not by me. But it IS the truth.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top