An Interesting Critique of Dr. Paul's 9/11 Truthers Answer

[Theocrat]

Click here to read it. What do you think?

 

[AceNZ]

More armchair quarterbacking. Coulda, woulda, shoulda.

I for one think RP's response was right-on.

 

[RonPaul_SantaMonica]

I think RP was right on too. You have to give the medicine in small doses, otherwise the patient will die.

 

[nosebruise]

i think paul nailed that one.

 

[Minlawc]

Click here to read it. What do you think?

I think John Lofton missed the point of the whole situation. He came there to debate, not to answer stupid questions that really have nothing to do with the presidency or any of the other candidates. If I were there I would've wanted my views shown, and would've been pissed if they asked me that.

 

[notcarljung]

Dr. Paul did what he always does. He expressed his opinion as straightforward and honestly as possible. Did Mr. Lofton want him to lie and say he was a 9/11 truther? lol.

 

[Joe3113]

As a someone wanting the truth about 9/11 but considering the current situation, he nailed it.

 

[dkim68]

I can't think of a better way that Dr. Paul could have responded. He was right on!

 

[TER]

When he said "If they [his supporter] cared for me" they would quell the issue may potentially refer to his physically safety, and not merely his campaign.

 

[VoluntaryMan]

I thought that Wendell Goler asked that question. I don't blame Paaul for deflecting. I think he should deflect stupid questions. But, when the same question keeps recurring, he should devise answers that discourage this, by exposing the questioner for the obvious (to us) fool that he is. His answers should make this fact clearer to a general audience (of idiots). Otherwise, the blogger is completely off base.

 

[TNTCAN]

Dr Paul knows what hes up against and is doing a great job.

 

[boberino]

Questions like these should not be posed to ANY candidate in the first place.

 

[steph3n]

Questions like these should not be posed to ANY candidate in the first place.

Agreed, I felt the same about the question to Huckabee as well.

 

[Carole]

The first problem is with the question itself. It was stupid.

The second problem is the assumption it makes that"many" RP supporters are 911 truth people. He does not say how many "many" is, but it could be a handful or even one.

So what, who cares. On the other hand how mnay lobbyists support the others? Now there is a legitimate question.

 

[ThinkAwake]

As a someone wanting the truth about 9/11 but considering the current situation, he nailed it.

Agree.

 

[VoluntaryMan]

Agreed, I felt the same about the question to Huckabee as well.

True, but it WAS a question about his own public statements, not about something a supporter said. So, it isn't really even in the same category as the questions to Dr. Paul.

 

[ShowMeLiberty]

Dr. Paul got it exactly right.

If 9/11 Truthers ever hope to see the truth they believe exists, they really need to put a lid on it for a while and get RP elected first. If we don't win this election whatever evidence may exist will remain forever hidden.

 

[lucius]

Dr Paul knows what hes up against and is doing a great job.

Agree

 

[Dr.3D]

I always thought a debate was where all the candidates were asked the same question.

This was not a debate but a group interview!

 

[JoBurke]

He did a great job and everyone with 2 bits of brain saw right through the fascist fox smear.