An Analysis of how Ron Paul did...

[Gimme Some Truth]

I find it ironic that Evandi is against the original poster because of the headline/title (appearance) but not the actual post (contents/message) considering what the original post was about

 

[evandi]

I find it ironic that Evandi is against the original poster because of the headline/title (appearance) but not the actual post (contents/message) considering what the original post was about

Why? Are you ignoring when I say that I do not mind people criticizing Ron Paul.

Eh? Calling everyone fanboys and saying this is REAL ANALYSIS, is not trollish?

Then saying Rudy Giuliani won doesn't make it plausible that he is a Giuliani supporter?

 

[evandi]

"If you're not with us you're against us" means: That I would be calling everybody who didn't agree with me a troll. I'm not. Just the OP and some of his defenders who want everyone to believe "There are no trolls".

 

[srmpass98]

You don't know that he isn't, and the thread title coupled with the meat of his post implies that he is. If he is not, great. But perhaps he should not insult everyone who disagrees with him before any debate whatsoever.

Oh, so all of a sudden your allegation that he is a Guilliani supporter is somewhat justified by the "possibility" that the contrary is also speculation?

I didn't find him to be insulting at all. He was pointing out his opinions, which by now its pretty obvious were in complete conflict with your opinion.

 

[VishIX]

You don't know that he isn't, and the thread title coupled with the meat of his post implies that he is. If he is not, great. But perhaps he should not insult everyone who disagrees with him before any debate whatsoever.

I said I was done with you guys (Samneric) but this is too good. My post was about RP getting msm attention. Now I have proven I know what I am talking about, I have your attention with 320 replies and 5200 views.

The reason I chose that title was because it would get people see what I was saying. I knew I had a well articulated argument but it would be a waste typing it if people weren't going to read it. It was an "in". I have studied how to communicate and how to influence. Even though you 2 don't agree with me, the majority do, that's why this thread has 3 stars instead of 1 or 2.

I know how RP can get more attention from joe sixpack and eddie punchclock. If only the campaign can figure it out, we'll have the presidency locked.

G'nite (im done feeding the trolls)

 

[evandi]

Oh, so all of a sudden your allegation that he is a Guilliani supporter is somewhat justified by the "possibility" that the contrary is also speculation?

I didn't find him to be insulting at all. He was pointing out his opinions, which by now its pretty obvious were in complete conflict with your opinion.

It is not insulting to call everyone a fanboy while saying this is REAL ANALYSIS?

 

[evandi]

I said I was done with you guys (Samneric) but this is too good. My post was about RP getting msm attention. Now I have proven I know what I am talking about, I have your attention with 320 replies and 5200 views.

The reason I chose that title was because it would get people see what I was saying. I knew I had a well articulated argument but it would be a waste typing it if people weren't going to read it. It was an "in". I have studied how to communicate and how to influence. Even though you 2 don't agree with me, the majority do, that's why this thread has 3 stars instead of 1 or 2.

I know how RP can get more attention from joe sixpack and eddie punchclock. If only the campaign can figure it out, we'll have the presidency locked.

G'nite (im done feeding the trolls)

Yes, um I could yell out fire in a crowded theater and get attention. Ya, that would make me brilliant. So you really are a troll, you just want to spin it that you are a different kind of troll?

 

[dawnbt]

Why? Are you ignoring when I say that I do not mind people criticizing Ron Paul.

Eh? Calling everyone fanboys and saying this is REAL ANALYSIS, is not trollish?

Then saying Rudy Giuliani won doesn't make it plausible that he is a Giuliani supporter?

It may be arrogant, but not necessarily trollish. If he were a troll, he would just go back and tell his friends about this crazy guy that kept calling him troll for two hours. Don't think we need the trolls spreading more "crazy" Ron Paul supporter crap do you. Relax. It's all good.

 

[evandi]

It may be arrogant, but not necessarily trollish. If he were a troll, he would just go back and tell his friends about this crazy guy that kept calling him troll for two hours. Don't think we need the trolls spreading more "crazy" Ron Paul supporter crap do you. Relax. It's all good.

No... if he were a troll he, as a troll, can do whatever he wants. He already had his effect, he can run with it any way he wishes. Now he is implying we are fools for falling into his tactics and reading his post. I don't think a sincere RP supporter would act that way, not because RP supporters are angels, but because why try to hurt other supporters like that for no reason?

And dismissing the troll factor on the internet is a red flag, no matter what else someone says.

 

[srmpass98]

It is not insulting to call everyone a fanboy while saying this is REAL ANALYSIS?

He may have worded it differently. I guess the amount of responses seems to justify his rhetoric. If you feel he is a troll, you just fed him. Good job!

 

[Gimme Some Truth]

"If you're not with us you're against us" means: That I would be calling everybody who didn't agree with me a troll. I'm not. Just the OP and some of his defenders who want everyone to believe "There are no trolls".

Seriously, you should apply for a job at Fox News. That, and quite a few of your other posts, along the same lines ,would make a great resume.

Anyway... time to turn the comp off me thinks.

Peace

 

[evandi]

He may have worded it differently. I guess the amount of responses seems to justify his rhetoric. If you feel he is a troll, you just fed him. Good job!

The responses were about him being a troll or not. So no, actually the amount of responses were justified by his rhetoric, not the other way around. No one talked about the issue he brought up, it was all about him being a troll.

If he likes having 30 pages of responses about how he is a troll... then he is strange. I think at the very least, this response is better then allowing a troll and some of his fellow trolls to leave bystanders with the impression that we're all extremely depressed and disappointed about his best debate.

Non-trolls may criticize.... but this criticism came from a troll. I barely addressed the criticism, I was all about how he is a troll.

 

[dawnbt]

No... if he were a troll he, as a troll, can do whatever he wants. He already had his effect, he can run with it any way he wishes. Now he is implying we are fools for falling into his tactics and reading his post. I don't think a sincere RP supporter would act that way, not because RP supporters are angels, but because why try to hurt other supporters like that for no reason?

And dismissing the troll factor on the internet is a red flag, no matter what else someone says.

But why do you have to be the troll Nazi? Everyone here but you and that guy who's handle starts with an "S", appear to be fine with this discussion (the discussion minus the constant "troll" posts. We don't need you to protect us. If you believe the OP is a troll than by all means, report your suspicions and find more elsewhere!

 

[evandi]

Seriously, you should apply for a job at Fox News. That, and quite a few of your other posts, along the same lines ,would make a great resume.

Anyway... time to turn the comp off me thinks.

Peace

When Bush said if you're not with us you're against us he was obviously implying that you can't be neutral, not that those who are against us are against us.

Your accusations are pretty lame.

 

[evandi]

But why do you have to be the troll Nazi? Everyone here but you and that guy who's handle starts with an "S", appear to be fine with this discussion (the discussion minus the constant "troll" posts. We don't need you to protect us. If you believe the OP is a troll than by all means, report your suspicions and find more elsewhere!

I'm fine with the discussion. I'm not here to argue against the criticisms. I really don't care enough to argue against them and I don't care about the point being made. But if you don't want to talk about whether or not he is a troll, don't talk about whether or not he is a troll. If we are arguing something and you keep making counterpoints, expect me to respond.

There is another post about this, as was pointed out. Stop responding to me and post there. If you did not notice, I'm not there, I'm here.

 

[dawnbt]

I'm fine with the discussion. I'm not here to argue against the criticisms. I really don't care enough to argue against them and I don't care about the point being made. But if you don't want to talk about whether or not he is a troll, don't talk about whether or not he is a troll. If we are arguing something and you keep making counterpoints, expect me to respond.

There is another post about this, as was pointed out. Stop responding to me and post there. If you did not notice, I'm not there, I'm here.

This is not your post! You did not add a thread titled "Let's talk about Trolls"! WE are trying to discuss the original post intelligently, but YOU keep arguing with us about f-ing trolls! No one here wants to argue about trolls. Don't you get it. The topic is not trolls! Go start one if you want and let us get back to the original topic without your paranoid outbursts.

 

[evandi]

This is not your post! You did not add a thread titled "Let's talk about Trolls"! WE are trying to discuss the original post intelligently, but YOU keep arguing with us about f-ing trolls! No one here wants to argue about trolls. Don't you get it. The topic is not trolls! Go start one if you want and let us get back to the original topic without your paranoid outbursts.

I didn't ask you for permission, I don't need your permission, and if you don't want to talk about trolls, stop. I will not stop arguing until I go to sleep, or until people stop responding to me with insults, requiring me to go on the defensive.

If you keep trying to prove that I'm wrong, expect a response.

 

[dawnbt]

I didn't ask you for permission, I don't need your permission, and if you don't want to talk about trolls, stop. I will not stop arguing until I go to sleep, or until people stop responding to me with insults, requiring me to go on the defensive.

If you keep trying to prove that I'm wrong, expect a response.

ignore button activated!

 

[evandi]

ignore button activated!

You could have simply refraimed from engaging in the activity you claimed to not want to engage in.

And the other guy did announce he would ignore me just to get others to do the same. He had no intention of doing it himself, as he showed. Goodnight, fair Troll.

 

[mello]

Maybe the next time the other candidates give him shit about his economic policy, he could mention that he has written 7 books on economics so he actually knows what the hell he's talking about.