Amazon removes hosting for Parler

Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
2,925
They did it.

I hope RPFs has backups...

You guys might want to download MeWe as well, I grabbed it because some of our people have some decent followings on there but I haven’t signed up yet. I feel it’s on the watchlist for takedown..

https://www.zerohedge.com/political...-drop-parler-aws-cloud-app-becomes-1-download

Update (2130 ET): And so the hammer has come down late on Saturday, when Amazon officially kicked Parler off its cloud Web hosting service, AWS according to Buzzfeed. The suspension means that once the ban takes effect on Sunday, the website - which as of this moment is still up - will be offline until it finds someone else to host it.

* * *

Update (2100 ET): As expected, Apple removed Parler permanently from its app store on Saturday. "[T]here is no place on our platform for threats of violence and illegal activity," the iPhone maker said, according to CNN which adds that Apple notified Parler of its decision in a message that said it had violated the company's app store terms.

"The processes Parler has put in place to moderate or prevent the spread of dangerous and illegal content have proved insufficient," Apple told Parler. "Specifically, we have continued to find direct threats of violence and calls to incite lawless action in violation of Guideline 1.1 - Safety - Objectionable Content."
 
Last edited:
They are being given about 24 hours to find a new host, which I am not sure they will. Their best bet is to self-host but that will open them up to a ton of other problems. To my knowledge, there aren't that many good competitors to AWS that are likely to host their site.
 
I bet Larry Ellison (oracle) will do it no prob, he hates Amazon.
 
Does no one want to make some money?

If I were an executive at a hosting service, I'd be reaching out to Parler and talking numbers immediately.

Putting that simple narrative argument outta the way, we all know what's going on and why. I wish Parler the best...
 
It’s analogous to physical gold vs. paper gold. If they have their own servers, it’s like physical gold.
 
Making money is a complex calculation. You don’t make money if you get shutdown for doing business with infidels or deplorables.

True, of course. But, I hope many of these companies will start seeing that their own wokeness is now a self-defeating cycle.

Purge half of the country, start filing into an echo chamber of society's scum and welfare recipients, commies, etc. You won't make much more money that way, either. I hope they all learn a good lesson in time.

Who is selling Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Twitter stock on Monday?

It's a good idea, I'd encourage anyone to do this who owns these fools.


Edit:

Anyone know a music streaming service that I can replace for Amazon Music? Preferably one that we [at least currently know of] not being full of a bunch of woke commies that will try to make petty statements?
 
Last edited:
So I guess I'll be canceling my Prime account too.

AWS sucks anyway. It would be much cheaper just to host themselves. The real problem begins when ISPs start getting in on this action.

Hopefully companies take note and get off this absurd "cloud" bandwagon. It's more expensive and you put your entire business at risk of being shut down in a moments notice on the whims of a few communists in their mid-twenties.
 
Does no one want to make some money?

If I were an executive at a hosting service, I'd be reaching out to Parler and talking numbers immediately.

I was in the business for 5 years. I'm already telling folks I know to jump on the opportunity. Doubt they will though...
 
Anyone know a music streaming service that I can replace for Amazon Music? Preferably one that we [at least currently know of] not being full of a bunch of woke commies that will try to make petty statements?

Spotify?

https://www.rollingstone.com/pro/news/who-really-owns-spotify-955388/

In total, at the close of last year, SEC documents show that exactly 65 percent of Spotify was owned by just six parties: the firm’s co-founders, Daniel Ek and Martin Lorentzon (30.6 percent of ordinary shares between them); Tencent Holdings Ltd. (9.1 percent); and a run of three asset-management specialists: Baillie Gifford (11.8 percent), Morgan Stanley (7.3 percent), and T.Rowe Price Associates (6.2 percent). These three investment powerhouses owned more than 25 percent of Spotify between them — a fact worth remembering next time there’s an argument about whose interests Spotify is acting in when it makes controversial moves (for example, SPOT’s ongoing legal appeal against a royalty pay rise for songwriters in the United States).

Furthermore, according to MBW estimates, which my sources suggest are still solid, two major record companies — Sony Music Entertainment and Universal Music Group — continue to jointly own between six percent and seven percent of Spotify (Sony around 2.35 percent and Universal around 3.5). With Sony and UMG added into the mix, then, the names mentioned here comfortably own more than 70 percent of Spotify.
 
Fantastic

...you have no right to the services of any of these enterprises.

Don't like it? Don't use it
 
Last edited:
Gab has their own servers & is running fine.

They have been fighting big tech for years & following path of independence
 
Gab has their own servers & is running fine.

They have been fighting big tech for years & following path of independence

They only got cut off from all banking services etc.
And what happens when the ISPs decide to block them? or when the DNS services decide to block them? etc.?
And don't say it can't happen.
 
Back
Top