Am I being petty about this?

Is AF being a pissy little girl about this?

  • Yes

    Votes: 15 40.5%
  • No

    Votes: 22 59.5%

  • Total voters
    37
Elaborate...

:confused:

He's saying that we're attacking soldiers and collectivizing them. (I think, I'm assuming so because he lists Ft. Bragg as his location so he is probably in the Army himself?)

Except that we're not, we're mocking the fact that airlines and other companies give them preferential treatment because they are soldiers and because the the perpetuated myth that they are "fighting for our freedom". If you don't believe that myth, you are bound to be attacked anywhere. I don't have anything personal against soldiers(though I question their logic and reasons for joining), however I find that perpetuated myth to be highly dangerous and annoying.
 
Last edited:
He's saying that we're attacking soldiers and collectivizing them. (I think, I'm assuming so because he lists Ft. Bragg as his location so he is probably in the Army himself?)

Except that we're not, we're mocking the fact that airlines and other companies give them preferential treatment because they are soldiers and because the the perpetuated myth that they are "fighting for our freedom". If you don't believe that myth, you are bound to be attacked anywhere. I don't have anything personal against soldiers(though I question their logic and reasons for joining), however I find that perpetuated myth to be highly dangerous and annoying.
I have no idea what he meant .
 
He's saying that we're attacking soldiers and collectivizing them. (I think, I'm assuming so because he lists Ft. Bragg as his location so he is probably in the Army himself?)

Except that we're not, we're mocking the fact that airlines and other companies give them preferential treatment because they are soldiers and because the the perpetuated myth that they are "fighting for our freedom". If you don't believe that myth, you are bound to be attacked anywhere.

That's what I was thinking too, but I was hoping he would have replied himself to clarify things.
 
Are you a frequent flyer? If so, then free upgrade to first class. If no first class available, then economy plus: 5" extra leg room. More than enough for your LARGE travel companion. Stop your whining, sailor boy. You're not sharing a berth.
 
Last edited:
Are you a frequent flyer? If so, then free upgrade to first class. If no first class available, then economy plus: 5" extra leg room. More than enough for your LARGE travel companion. Stop your whining, sailor boy. You're not sharing a berth.

Silence!

If I waited around for a free elite upgrade, I'd still be in steerage with the likes of you.

ETA-I'm assuming you voted "yes". :collins:
 
If I waited around for a free elite upgrade, I'd still be in steerage with the likes of you.

You can sit in steerage next to me, just leave your companion behind.

P.S. I usually get the the exit row, for free, haha.
 
Last edited:
If it were a government mandated program I'd say legitimate gripe, but it's a private company. They can board their plane whatever way they see fit, including forcing First Class to board last, if that's the way they want to run it. If you are unhappy with their policy, voice your concern with them. If you are unhappy with their response, cease your business with them. If you're unwilling to use your most powerful tool against a private company as a consumer, then it's really not that big of deal to you.

;)
 
If it were a government mandated program I'd say legitimate gripe, but it's a private company. They can board their plane whatever way they see fit, including forcing First Class to board last, if that's the way they want to run it. If you are unhappy with their policy, voice your concern with them. If you are unhappy with their response, cease your business with them. If you're unwilling to use your most powerful tool against a private company as a consumer, then it's really not that big of deal to you.

;)

Just serve him some Barnacles and have some fat belly dancers for the in flight entertainment and he'd be a regular.
 
For a number of reasons, but for me, here is the primary reason:

I do not check bags, everything I take with me goes carry on, including a backpack containing a number of vital documents and other vital stuff.

Boarding late or last, will almost guarantee that your carry on items will have to get checked and that backpack I mentioned will get stuck in the three inches of legroom under the seat in front of me.

And bags checked at the last minute will get lost.

I guess that makes sense. Personally, I always travel light. If I have enough stuff to need to check, I'd rather send it UPS or FedEx so at least it can be insured, and just meet it at my destination. Typically the only things I carry with me when travelling are my cell phone, a book, one change of clothes, and toiletries. Everything else can go UPS.
 
Yay collectivism!

It wouldn't be "collectivist" to talk about senior citizens getting senior discounts; by definition they are eligible. AF is talking about military boarding an aircraft first, which by policy they are eligible to do. How that is collectivist is beyond me.

I gave a couple of reasons, but I think the reason this is being done in that particular situation is to "thank them for service." Frankly, that's ridiculous on various levels.

If you are going on the assumption that everyone wearing a military uniform has served (which is, by the way, collectivist), and so they deserve special thanks, then what of veterans? I mean, aren't there a whole lot of NON-UNIFORMED people out there who've actually served? If it is really about gratitude for service, wouldn't the pre-boarding be for veterans who can present military ID or proof of service? Why wouldn't the airlines provide, say, a check-box where you can say you are a veteran and present ID? Of course, will we allow foreign veterans to present ID and board? What's the definition? Is it only for people who are a part of the US Armed Forces? That's kind of rude, you know. What if there's a WWII veteran visiting from the UK or France? Shouldn't they get to pre-board?

When you start to think of it that way, the "honoring" and "thanking" goes out the window, because there are assumptions being made that are baseless. You are including very green recruits in this category and excluding veterans, sometimes of multiple wars, who deserve thanks and honoring.

The kicker is that if you asked that last category whether or not they wanted a "thank you" at every turn, they'd be pretty likely to tell you "no."

If it were a government mandated program I'd say legitimate gripe, but it's a private company. They can board their plane whatever way they see fit, including forcing First Class to board last, if that's the way they want to run it. If you are unhappy with their policy, voice your concern with them. If you are unhappy with their response, cease your business with them. If you're unwilling to use your most powerful tool against a private company as a consumer, then it's really not that big of deal to you.

;)

To a certain extent, this is true, but please note that it is the airport and not the airline that seems to have the policy.

so wear a military uniform, and enjoy the better things.

It's against the law, though, so if you're already at an airport (where we know that common sense and rights are endangered species), it's probably not worth it. Much safer to just fake a limp and say you need to get on with all the new mommies and cripples.

There's also this for a bonus, in case you want to be more than a common military kiddo:

Under the Stolen Valor Act it is now a Federal Offense, punishable by up to $5,000 fine and six months in jail (double that if the offense involves valor awards or the Purple Heart), to claim VERBALLY or in WRITING, to have received any military award you did not.
 
You know, while I'm on the subject...

Was sitting here with my son, watching "Crimson Tide" and came to the part where the Alabama was submerging at the start of their cruise.

How was it that the government appropriated "Eternal Father, Strong to Save" for themselves, exclusively?

For almost 80 years it was associated with a hymnal prayer for people like me, who sail the seas for commerce and industry, not for those who sail the seas to project government force and possibly incinerate people.
 
Last edited:
You know, while I'm on the subject...

Was sitting here with my son, watching "Crimson Tide" and came to the part where the Alabama was submerging at the start of their cruise.

How was it that the the government appropriated "Eternal Father, Strong to Save" for themselves, exclusively?

For almost 80 years it was associated with a hymnal prayer for people like me, who sail the seas for commerce and industry, not for those who sail the seas to project government force and possibly incinerate people.

Experience tells me that the regime will expropriate any old thing (cultural or otherwise) necessary to coerce and/or dupe/propagandize the masses. BTW, this is what the National Endowment For The Arts is for too. It's essentially part of the propaganda arm of the Regime.
 
I got 5 days at Disneyland for free because I am active duty military. Suck on that, mundanes!
 
Are you being petty about this? No.

Thirty years ago Vietnam vets were spit upon, particularly by people who had gone to prison to protest the imperialism and the draft that sought to force us to take part. Then people realized that such behavior is not exactly just. Now tptb seem to want us to assume every member of the armed forces is motivated by the highest of ideals. They may get fooled by their bosses, but the always join for the right reasons. No one ever joined the Marines just because they wanted to kill someone.

And, no, never having joined no more makes one a second class citizen than being a veteran in plain clothes makes one second class to currently active servicepeople.

I got 5 days at Disneyland for free because I am active duty military. Suck on that, mundanes!

You earned the hell out of it. Enjoy!
 
This is in Houston? Next time as the military "heroes" are boarding holler-"Recuerdo San Jacinto" and rush on ahead. Let me know cause I want to be there to see it. LOL
 
Experience tells me that the regime will expropriate any old thing (cultural or otherwise) necessary to coerce and/or dupe/propagandize the masses. BTW, this is what the National Endowment For The Arts is for too. It's essentially part of the propaganda arm of the Regime.

Good point.

Just as DARPA is used for the regime to get it's filthy mitts on cutting edge technology, first.
 
Back
Top