Allen West: Obama decided "beauty rest" more important than saving Americans in Benghazi

[ObiRandKenobi]

Allen West: Obama decided "beauty rest" more important than saving Americans in Benghazi

Harsh.



h/t MFP

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Nothing wrong with right and left wing neocons turning on each other.

Keep up AW.

 

[Root]

Didn't Hillary run "it's 3am and the red phone rings" commercials in 2007?

 

[CaptUSA]

Didn't Hillary run "it's 3am and the red phone rings" commercials in 2007?

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Didn't Hillary run "it's 3am and the red phone rings" commercials in 2007?

And same ads could run against her in 2016 if rumors of deal between Clinton and Obama pup masters are true.

 

[Root]

Haha. Thanks for the reminder.

 

[Feeding the Abscess]

I'd take beauty rest over imperialism, too.

The Benghazi incident has many lines of viable attack - "where wur da Mareens!!1111" is not one of them.

 

[Sola_Fide]

Nothing wrong with right and left wing neocons turning on each other.

Keep up AW.

Really? I don't think they are turning on each other though. They are just jokeying for which team can run the empire better.

 

[Warlord]

I'd take beauty rest over imperialism, too.

The Benghazi incident has many lines of viable attack - "where wur da Mareens!!1111" is not one of them.

It's Obama and Clinton's job to provide adequate security for a mission. Policy as to whether mission should be there or not is a different story.

 

[CPUd]

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Really? I don't think they are turning on each other though. They are just jokeying for which team can run the empire better.

Your statement is far more accurte than mine, I suspect. I stand corrected.

 

[Feeding the Abscess]

It's Obama and Clinton's job to provide adequate security for a mission. Policy as to whether mission should be there or not is a different story.

By international treaty, it's the host country's responsibility to provide security for embassies and diplomatic missions. How would the US government take it if Iran and Pakistan sent their militaries in to protect its US mission from an attack and quell the threat?

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

By international treaty, it's the host country's responsibility to provide security for embassies and diplomatic missions. How would the US government take it if Iran and Pakistan sent their militaries in to protect its US mission from an attack and quell the threat?

Let's refresh everyone's history on Libya first, you'll have to translate to English if you can't read French, Highly recommended you read every word:

That may be true in a US embassy or consulate. But this is about the CIA running arms and working with Al Qaeda in their Benghazi CIA annex that went sour.

Mahmoud Jibril, who have met several times in 2010 Bernard-Henri Levy (the CIA and Mossad, became the Minister of War occult French) to develop the plan to eliminate Gaddafi and deliver the country to foreign powers.

Bernard-Henri Levy is carried by most US media and regularly promoted by Huffington Post.

http://www.internationalnews.fr/art...nisation-ii-par-joelle-penochet-90100327.html

West & Hannity are just another distraction, forget anything that comes out of their mouths

The Al Qaeda flags fly over Sirte & Benghazi

 

[compromise]

By international treaty, it's the host country's responsibility to provide security for embassies and diplomatic missions. How would the US government take it if Iran and Pakistan sent their militaries in to protect its US mission from an attack and quell the threat?

Iran have no mission in the United States. Pakistan are considered a major non-NATO ally of the United States. Not a very good analogy.

 

[Feeding the Abscess]

Iran have no mission in the United States. Pakistan are considered a major non-NATO ally of the United States. Not a very good analogy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interests_Section_of_the_Islamic_Republic_of_Iran_in_the_United_States

 

[Warlord]

By international treaty, it's the host country's responsibility to provide security for embassies and diplomatic missions. How would the US government take it if Iran and Pakistan sent their militaries in to protect its US mission from an attack and quell the threat?

Libya's government had just been overthrown and whether you and me agree with it or not the US had a facility there. The host country weren't protecting the facility (which was NOT an embassy) the February 17th Militia Brigade was. Do State militias guard embassy's in the US?

The security for the facility was inadequate and it's a legitimate concern to parrot especially on Fox News and talk radio where they dont want to hear too much about why there's a mission there in the first place. Although, the cover story is that Clinton wanted a photo opp for 2016 the facility was more a CIA outpost with only 7 State Department employees among the 33 rescued.

You can bet the CIA's stations in other countries are under serious protection and not by the host country either!

 

[Warlord]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interests_Section_of_the_Islamic_Republic_of_Iran_in_the_United_States

The Benghazi facility was not an embassy and I dont think it was even accredited as such even officially. It was a CIA outpost to supply weapons, recruit jihadists for Syria and torture suspects.

The embassy was in Tripoli and not attacked.

 

[klamath]

Obama had just spent 6 months bombing the hell out of Libya and NOW they are worried about violating libyia's sovereign airspace to protect Americans? The only reason those people died is because Obama wanted his nation building to appear to have created a highly stable western democracy compared to Bush's Iraq disaster...