Alleged victim of Trump rape in 1995 testifies in NYC trial

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,609
E. Jean Carroll Gives Jury Graphic Testimony of Rape Trump Denies

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/trump-sha...pDq1WHlF_IcyrfQtvsDXCZvnFieGxhN8yB7xdgDkNy5FX

Erik Larson Wed, April 26, 2023

(Bloomberg) -- The New York author who sued Donald Trump claiming he raped her in a department store in the 1990s testified in graphic detail about the alleged assault, breaking down at times and saying she even bought bullets in fear of the blowback from her accusation.

E. Jean Carroll, a journalist and former Elle magazine advice columnist, told a jury of six men and three women in Manhattan federal court on Wednesday that she kept silent about the alleged attack in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room for decades, believing Trump would destroy her if she spoke up. That’s exactly what he tried to do when she went public in 2019, Carroll said.

“I am here because Donald Trump raped me, and when I wrote about it he said it didn’t happen,” Carroll, 79, said under questioning by her lawyer. She added: “He shattered my reputation and I’m trying to get my life back.”

The jury will decide whether Trump, 76, is liable for sexually assaulting Carroll and then defaming her as recently as last year by claiming on social media that she fabricated the attack to sell a book. If they find him liable, the jurors will decide how much he must pay Carroll. The case has brought new attention to past claims about Trump’s treatment of women that failed to derail his 2016 presidential campaign, as he runs in the 2024 race

Carroll began sobbing on the witness stand as she spoke of “finally” getting her day in court, but she stopped her lawyer from asking the judge for a break and quickly composed herself.

“This is my moment,” she said. “I’m not going to sit here and cry and waste everybody’s time.”

Trump has denied wrongdoing and argues the case is part of a broader political “witch hunt.” He says that includes his recent indictment in a case brought by the Manhattan district attorney as well as criminal probes of his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. On Wednesday morning he blasted Carroll’s lawsuit again in a social media post, calling it a “scam” and deriding his accuser as “Ms. Bergdorf Goodman.” He has said the alleged attack is clearly fabricated, given Carroll’s age and because she is not his “type.”

Trump attorney Joe Tacopina signaled during his opening argument on Tuesday that he’ll seek to undermine Carroll’s story by presenting evidence that she is motivated by an animus toward Trump and that she waited too long to come forward with her claim if it were true.

Trump hasn’t said yet whether he will testify in his defense or attend any part of the trial.

Carroll told the jurors that the blowback she experienced after making her allegations public was so severe that she bought new bullets for a gun she owns. The crude emails were driven by Trump calling her a liar from the White House, she said.

“Boy, it hit me and it laid me low — I lost my reputation,” she said. “Even people who knew me looked at me with pity, and the people who had no opinion now thought I was a liar and hated me.”

She told the jury: “My God, the force of hatred coming at me was staggering.”

Asked to describe how the alleged assault unfolded, Carroll testified that she and Trump ran into each other at the luxury department store while shopping. She told the jury she agreed to help him pick out a gift for a woman.

Carroll said Trump asked her to go to the sixth-floor lingerie department, where they eventually found a lacy bodysuit that he jokingly suggested she try on. She said she told him he should try it on instead, thinking he would put the bodysuit on over his pants.

Carroll told the jurors she agreed to go into a dressing room with him, thinking it was an amusing moment, “sort of like a Saturday Night Live sketch.”

She said Trump then “shut the door and shoved me against the wall. He shoved me so hard my head banged. I was extremely confused and suddenly realized that what I thought was happening was not happening.”

She testified that she didn’t scream but instead fought to get away, even though Trump is much larger than she is.

“My whole reason for being alive in that moment was to get out of that room,” she said. She said she was “trying to wriggle out from under him, but he had pulled down my tights” and assaulted her with his fingers, “which was extremely painful. He put his hand inside of me and curved his finger. As I’m sitting here today I can still feel it.”

“I’m proud to say I did get out,” Carroll told the court. “I got my knee up and pushed him back.”

She fought back tears as she described the guilt she felt over why she went into the dressing room with Trump.

“I was ashamed,” she said. “I thought it was my fault. Because I was flirting with him.”

While the jury was on a break, US District Judge Lewis Kaplan issued a ruling barring Trump’s legal team from telling the panel that a billionaire donor to the Democratic Party was helping to finance Carroll’s suit. Trump argued the financing by LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman undermined Carroll’s credibility.

“There is virtually nothing there as to credibility, and even if there were, the unfair prejudicial effect of going into this subject would very substantially outweigh any probative value,” Kaplan said. “The subject is closed.”

The day started with the judge warning Tacopina about his client’s social media habits, telling the lawyer that the Trump post calling the case a scam and going after Carroll’s lawyer as a “political operative” could expose the former president to “a new potential source of liability.”

In his post Trump also referred to the infamous dress that White House intern Monica Lewinsky wore in an assignation with Bill Clinton. He suggested Carroll was bluffing about male DNA found on her own clothes and that it would only have exonerated him if she had accepted his last-minute offer to provide a sample.

That drew an exasperated reply from the judge, since Carroll finally gave up on seeking a sample from Trump after many delays.

“He refused for three years to give a DNA sample, and now he wants it in the case?” Kaplan fumed.
 
Almost 30 years after the alleged fact? Is there a statute of limitations on something like this?
 
Not for rape in NY state.

I think this is a civil case anyways.

Regardless of the legal technicalities, it just goes to demonstrate what's really at stake, here. For all any of us knows, this woman's story is true. But the very same people who are lining up the entire apparatus of state power to try to take down Trump had no issues with him for decades prior, while he was a RE tycoon and entertainer raking in billions and paying taxes to them. So, they try to present these vignettes from Trump's life -- howsoever true or not they may be -- as some kind of proof of Trump's corruption out of a desperate attempt to take him down. In other words, neither law nor morality has anything to do with this. They are dredging the entire history of Trump's past in a desperate search for that one nugget of dirt that will nuke him in the court of public opinion. Why do we continue to tolerate this kind of obvious gaming of public opinion? We ought to find rape, even attempted rape, horrifying. We ought to find any of the sins that they accuse Trump of, horrifying. But the very act of gaming the moral sense of the public for political aims and ends desensitizes us. In the limit, we are setting the stage for a second Sodom and Gomorrah, a generation of people with absolutely no moral sense whatsoever and the public space will be converted into a playground for the powerful to act out their whims, like Mad Max warlords. What then? When the whole world is Thunderdome, what is there to be "offended" at? Rape will just be a spectator sport at that point... :facepalming:
 
I can't stand Trump, but this woman has zero proof.

I could say Trump touched my pee-pee 30 years ago and sue him too.
 
Donald Trump mistook rape accuser E Jean Carroll for ex-wife, trial told
Published
14 hours ago

Share
Court sketch showing E Jean Carroll and Donald Trump deposition video
IMAGE SOURCE,REUTERS
Image caption,
Donald Trump's deposition was played for the jury in Manhattan on Thursday
By Holly Honderich
BBC News
Donald Trump appeared to mistake E Jean Carroll for his ex-wife Marla Maples in a deposition played for jurors in Ms Carroll's civil rape suit against him.

In the video, Mr Trump was shown a photo of himself speaking to other people at an event. "It's Marla," he says, before his lawyer corrects him.

"No, that's Carroll," the lawyer says.

Ms Carroll, 79, has accused Mr Trump, 76, of attacking her in a New York City department store in the mid-1990s, an allegation Mr Trump has denied.

Lawyers for Ms Carroll have argued that Mr Trump's confusion over the photo undermines his claim that Ms Carroll is "not my type", a comment he has repeated since she first came forward with the allegation in 2019.


Mr Trump has not yet attended the civil trial, now drawing to a close after two weeks of proceedings in Manhattan. Both sides rested their case on Thursday, though Mr Trump's team called no witnesses in his defence.

He had told reporters he might cut his ongoing golf trip to Ireland short to "confront" Ms Carroll in court.

"I'll be going back early because a woman made a claim that is totally false, it's fake," Mr Trump said.

Mr Trump's suggestion that he would return to New York comes after his lawyer, Joseph Tacopina, told the judge Mr Trump would not testify in court.

Referring to Mr Trump's comments, the judge said he would give Mr Trump until Sunday afternoon to decide. After that, the judge said, "that ship has irrevocably sailed".

The nine-member jury was shown the video of a combative deposition between the former president and Roberta Kaplan, one of Ms Carroll's lawyers, filmed last October.

Mr Trump continued his emphatic denials of Ms Carroll's accusation, that Mr Trump manoeuvred her into a dressing room at the Bergdorf Goodman store in Manhattan and raped her.

"If it did happen, it would have been reported within minutes," Mr Trump said in the deposition, suggesting that others at the "very busy store" would have heard an ongoing attack.

Jurors in the nearly two-week trial heard days of graphic testimony. Ms Carroll told jurors she was left "unable to ever have a romantic life again" after the alleged attack.

Marla Maples and her daughter Tiffany Trump
IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
Marla Maples was married to Mr Trump from 1993 until 1999
Her account was supported in court by her friend, Lisa Birnbach, who testified this week to receiving a call from Ms Carroll minutes after she says she was raped.

And two other women - Jessica Leeds and Natasha Stoynoff - were called by Ms Carroll's team and described alleged sexual assaults committed by Mr Trump - claims he has denied.

A former columnist for Elle magazine, Ms Carroll was able to bring the civil case against Mr Trump after New York passed the Adult Survivors Act in 2022.

The act allowed a one-year period for victims to file sexual assault lawsuits in the state over claims that would have normally exceeded statute limitations.​

Marla Maples

_129601038_marlamaples-tiffany.jpg.webp


E. Jean Carroll 30 years ago

230424160113-trump-carroll-johnson-trump-nbc-party.jpg


Yeah, she's not his type now as he doesn't like women his own age at this point. (Melania is only 49).

The "very busy store" argument does carry some weight in my opinion. No allegation of a gun or a knife, just physical force which begs the question "Did she scream?" We're talking about a place where you would expect someone to come to your aid if they heard you screaming. On the flipside, if she were to conjure up a story, why did would she use a department store? I dunno. But the "She's not my type" defense is BS.
 
Back
Top