All Hell Breaking Loose In The South Sudan

Sad news.

Is it time for George Colooney to come out and do a media arrest? Or he is going to wait until anything major like Gaza bombing takes place for him to hit the roads for Sudan.
 
You really can't blame the UN because it is a known fact that they are useless and can't do anything.They depend on money,diplomats and troops from various nations who all have different agendas.And even the soldiers they have can hardly be called an army,they are more on the level of mall security.

The main problem in Africa as with much of the Middle East is that all of those countries were made with pencil on a map IN a European capital so they don't represent the situation on ground in any way and all the "helping" with trying to preserve some kind of status quo is just making things worse.Everyone should just let them duke it out for a few hundred years and see what comes on top.Because currently they are lagging way behind on the civilization scale ,while having all the modern toys.
 
Last edited:
No surprise here at all.

Gen Westley Clark explains how there was a plan to invade and take over 7 countries in 5 years. He was told, “we have a good military AND we can take down governments“…. the plan was revealed to Clark right after we first started bombing Afghanistan and it went like this; Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran.

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2011/04/01/7-countries-in-5-years/



_71828193_sud_oil.gif



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-25456862
 
Now that invading Syria is unlikely, Obama can invade South Sudan to make sure he gets to have a war tied to his name.
 
First they disarm the people and promise to provide them with protection and then they withdraw while the people they pledged to protect are slaughtered. Yeah Obama we want some of that here.
 
First they disarm the people and promise to provide them with protection and then they withdraw while the people they pledged to protect are slaughtered. Yeah Obama we want some of that here.


It appears to be on its way.
 
First they disarm the people and promise to provide them with protection and then they withdraw while the people they pledged to protect are slaughtered. Yeah Obama we want some of that here.

Well, if you really want some...

 
- one of the early articles talked about people fleeing to the UN compound, and the UN taking the position that "the peacekeepers would not get involved."

Peacekeepers that don't get involved in keeping peace. How's that workin' out?

Those that think that UN troops will be used in the US for gun confiscation or other enforcement of tyrannical acts should keep that in mind. Most armies that contribute troops to the UN are a joke.
 
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/12/21/21996598-four-hurt-as-gunfire-hits-us-military-plane-sent-to-evacuate-americans-from-south-sudan

US Ospreys hit by AA fire on mission over Sudan. Airmen/soldiers reported injured. What Yay-hoo in DoD decided it would be a great idea to send in low-slow assets in an area with active AA without a suppressive escort?

XNN
What Yay-hoo decided we needed Ospreys in the first place?

Another corporate welfare scheme.

I wonder which counties build this piece of shit. Key counties for elections, no doubt. (and to be fair, from what I understand the V-22 isn't as bad as it was in the mid-nineties. A waste of money still.)
 
Back
Top