Alex Jones video

[itshappening]

check out this Alex Jones video:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6607820174911824356&hl=en

scary !!!

 

[yongrel]

I agree. Alex Jones is scary.

 

[PatriotOne]

I agree. Alex Jones is scary.

Yongrel.....please wipe your ass better and quit leaving shit stains everywhere you go k?

 

[coyote_sprit]

I agree. Alex Jones is scary.

Normally I laugh at your comments but a video about pro-lifers being treated inhumanely is not something to laugh at.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Pay yongrel no mind when he is Jones-bashing.

He can't help it.

If Jones said the sun rose in the east and the sky was blue, yongrel would call bullshit.

I don't know why though.

 

[evilfunnystuff]

Pay yongrel no mind when he is Jones-bashing.

He can't help it.

If Jones said the sun rose in the east and the sky was blue, yongrel would call bullshit.

I don't know why though.

to be competely honest i sometimes think he is an agent provacateur placed to incite division amoung the movement along with amy

 

[yongrel]

to be competely honest i sometimes think he is an agent provacateur placed to incite division amoung the movement along with amy

Uh oh, you've found me out.

 

[evilfunnystuff]

Uh oh, you've found me out.

whether you are 1 or not thats what you do

 

[PatriotOne]

to be competely honest i sometimes think he is an agent provacateur placed to incite division amoung the movement along with amy

Assuming he's not Amy also. AP's like to make multiple ID's so they can agree with themselves .

 

[DrYongrel]

Assuming he's not Amy also. AP's like to make multiple ID's so they can agree with themselves .

Horse hockey.

 

[amy31416]

Assuming he's not Amy also. AP's like to make multiple ID's so they can agree with themselves .

I think that anyone with a scintilla of smarts could take the quickest of glances at writing styles, verbage, grammatical tendencies and figure it out.

It does seem to be a trend that I'm often pissed off at similar things and hold some similar sentiments, but beyond that, yongrel just actually reminds me of a friend of mine who had a similar snarky style and I'm quite used to it.

That said, I don't care one way or the other about Jones and you've never seen a post of mine criticizing him. Do I consider him a good news source? No. I'd have to verify anything he writes several times over before I might believe it. He has an obvious bias--his whole career is based on promoting conspiracy theories--some of which may have merit, many probably don't. Either way, if you'd like your own little RPF conspiracy theory that I am yongrel, feel free. It's easy enough to ask a mod, but much more fun to speculate that I'm a government agent sent to mock you for questioning these sensitive issues that the government is trying to keep under wraps.

 

[AutoDas]

HAha

Ron Paul Forums isn't a conspiracy theorist movement

 

[DrAmy31415]

Horse hockey.

I couldn't possibly agree more.

 

[evilfunnystuff]

HAha

Ron Paul Forums isn't a conspiracy theorist movement

no one said it was but scice you mentioned it

anyone who claims the federal reserve is illeagal and uncontitutional is a "conspiracy teorist"

anyone who claims there are moves to create a nau and world govt is a "conspiracy teorist"

anyone who claims the 9/11 report wasnt sufficant and leaves many questions is a "conspiracy teorist"

these are all "conspiracy theorys" ron paul belives

 

[Anti Federalist]

amy wrote:

He has an obvious bias--his whole career is based on promoting conspiracy theories

I'm a fan of Jones, it was Jones who brought Ron Paul to my attention years ago, and just too damn much of what he has opined on has come true.

Not that I'm claiming he has some gift of prophecy, because that's not required to see what's coming. I think it is to every RP supporter: more government, more taxation, more corruption and dirty dealing, more global mandates, more war, more surveillance, more police, more prisons.

That's the grand "conspiracy", the one that all others are secondary to. And it's nothing new, it's what Ike warned us about in 1960, the New World Order is nothing more than the global manifestation of the Military Industrial Complex.

And they are corrupt merchants of death, they would not think twice about killing thousands in false flag terror op, nor a million in war and sanctions against a whole nation.

So this is what Jones is on about, in ten years I've found the majority of what he has to say is accurate.

So if you haven't, (I don't know this one way or the other) give him a listen sometime.

 

[PatriotOne]

I think that anyone with a scintilla of smarts could take the quickest of glances at writing styles, verbage, grammatical tendencies and figure it out.

It does seem to be a trend that I'm often pissed off at similar things and hold some similar sentiments, but beyond that, yongrel just actually reminds me of a friend of mine who had a similar snarky style and I'm quite used to it.

That said, I don't care one way or the other about Jones and you've never seen a post of mine criticizing him. Do I consider him a good news source? No. I'd have to verify anything he writes several times over before I might believe it. He has an obvious bias--his whole career is based on promoting conspiracy theories--some of which may have merit, many probably don't. Either way, if you'd like your own little RPF conspiracy theory that I am yongrel, feel free. It's easy enough to ask a mod, but much more fun to speculate that I'm a government agent sent to mock you for questioning these sensitive issues that the government is trying to keep under wraps.

I'm definately speculating. I just have a hard time believing there are that many morons on one forum.

 

[Cowlesy]

lol all of the people in this thread are Ron Paul supporters, but have extremely different sets of beliefs.

I listen to Alex Jones on occasion. He went all-in for Ron with $2,300. I don't agree with anyone 100% of the time, and I'd hazard a guess that statement could be made by about everyone else in this thread

 

[yongrel]

lol all of the people in this thread are Ron Paul supporters, but have extremely different sets of beliefs.

I listen to Alex Jones on occasion. He went all-in for Ron with $2,300. I don't agree with anyone 100% of the time, and I'd hazard a guess that statement could be made by about everyone else in this thread

As always, Cowlesy shows up as the voice of reason. I second Amy's proposition that you run for office.

 

[amy31416]

amy wrote:



I'm a fan of Jones, it was Jones who brought Ron Paul to my attention years ago, and just too damn much of what he has opined on has come true.

Not that I'm claiming he has some gift of prophecy, because that's not required to see what's coming. I think it is to every RP supporter: more government, more taxation, more corruption and dirty dealing, more global mandates, more war, more surveillance, more police, more prisons.

That's the grand "conspiracy", the one that all others are secondary to. And it's nothing new, it's what Ike warned us about in 1960, the New World Order is nothing more than the global manifestation of the Military Industrial Complex.

And they are corrupt merchants of death, they would not think twice about killing thousands in false flag terror op, nor a million in war and sanctions against a whole nation.

So this is what Jones is on about, in ten years I've found the majority of what he has to say is accurate.

So if you haven't, (I don't know this one way or the other) give him a listen sometime.

I would if he played anywhere around here, but I just read some of his stuff on prisonplanet from time to time.

For example:
Believe it or not, back in Baltimore, I did this long-term study that required my presence at 4AM, so I'd drag myself out of bed at 2:30 AM and I listened to George Noory every morning for the entire six months.

I mean, I'm not close-minded, and George seems like a nice enough guy, but he went on and on about little filaments in the air, government conspiracies, numerology, psychics, alien children among us and all kinds of bizarre topics. So, with George Noory, as with Alex Jones, when they do say something that I think might have basis in provable truth--I have to do more research because it's become "conspiracy theorized" automatically because of the initial source.

So when George says something about a government conspiracy, what's his source? A psychic? A tea leaf reading? Alex Jones is like a lighter version of that--he's in too deep, his career depends on conspiracy theories, just like O'Reilly's depends on toeing the neocon line. I don't believe things O'Reilly says without doing research, same goes for Alex Jones.

End of ramblings. . .

 

[Cowlesy]

As always, Cowlesy shows up as the voice of reason. I second Amy's proposition that you run for office.

Me run for office? Surely you can't be serious.

It's much more rewarding to toil behind the scenes and try to work on getting those elected who actually want to work for the gubmint.