Alex Jones: "I'm sold on Ted Cruz"

[compromise]

 

[Warlord]

This Warlord is definitely not.

MaverickPAC, Bush, neocon friends like Mark Levin and bankster wife are all too much to ignore.

Sorry Ted.

 

[PSYOP]

The guy has Goldman Sachs connections -- I wouldn't trust him 100%.

 

[Warlord]

By the way you notice Mark Levin sounding like a constitutional conservative lately?

He was saying on TV the other day we need to stand up for the 4th amendment... WHAT? He cheered the PATRIOT act and Bush's desecration of it.

These guys are slick and Ted Cruz is a big buddy of his!

 

[Petar]

I understand that Cruz has some shitty associations, but he just doesn't ring the scumbag alarm for me, in the intuitive sense.

I guess that my feeling is that I expect that there would be some areas where he would sharply diverge from the libertarian point of view, but at least he seems honest and predictable?

 

[Warlord]

Levin was saying last night we need to get rid of the IRS... yet just a few months ago he was ridiculing the one guy who had the courage to push this (Ron)

See how fast these guys change their spots?

 

[Petar]

Levin was saying last night we need to get rid of the IRS... yet just a few months ago he was ridiculing the one guy who had the courage to push this (Ron)

See how fast these guys change their spots?

That is Levin, but is Cruz shitty like that too?

 

[Warlord]

Levin is big buddies with Cruz and knows him personally from years ago.

They're essentially the same: neocons who cheered Bush and used their lawyer skills to give him a pass on torture and the 4th amendment's destruction and the war in Iraq.

Ted just wasn't around then but dont think for a minute this isnt his mindset.

 

[compromise]

Rand's close friends with Beck and to some extent Ingraham. Most of these Senators have a radio talk show host buddy. I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

If Levin's sounding different recently, that's a good thing.

 

[Petar]

Levin is big buddies with Cruz and knows him personally from years ago.

They're essentially the same: neocons who cheered Bush and used their lawyer skills to give him a pass on torture and the 4th amendment's destruction and the war in Iraq.

Ted just wasn't around then but dont think for a minute this isnt his mindset.

Well, for now there is no doubt that he is helping.

When he does something really shitty, then I guess that we will have cause to crucify him at that point.

 

[Warlord]

Rand's close friends with Beck and to some extent Ingraham. Most of these Senators have a radio talk show host buddy. I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

If Levin's sounding different recently, that's a good thing.

I think that comparison is wrong... Ted and Levin's association likely go back further than Rand knowing Ingraham/Beck. They're both lawyers and he keeps sayihg he knows him from years back i.e 10 years or more. He's Levin's type of Republican. He was then and is now: Neoconish, ready to use the military and support war and ready to give people like Bush a pass

Levin sounds different because there's a Democrat in the White House. He's still pro-empire, pro-war and an incoherent lunatic.

See this for what they're up to:
http://lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo253.html

And dont forget they hate our guts.

 

[Warlord]

Mark Levin joined in the attack on Scheuer using strawmen: 'He's blaming the jews, leftist idiot!'

I wonder if he's seen Rand's reading list yet?

You see... they're not our friends. They hate our guts.

Don't forget it.

 

[CaptUSA]

Cruz adds weight to our side of the scale. That's enough for me. Even if it's not as much weight as someone else, it doesn't matter. Same goes for Rand.

There are those that work towards liberty and those that work towards tyranny. As long as any of these folks don't try to infringe upon me, they are good people to have around.

 

[V3n]

I'm not going to play "guilty by association" - his votes have been good - a lot better than either of my Senators. Until he disappoints in that regard, I see no reason not to get behind him.

 

[Warlord]

I'm not going to play "guilty by association" - his votes have been good - a lot better than either of my Senators. Until he disappoints in that regard, I see no reason not to get behind him.

He's unlikely to let you down because he's too clever and in stealth mode.

 

[compromise]

I think that comparison is wrong... Ted and Levin's association likely go back further than Rand knowing Ingraham/Beck. They're both lawyers and he keeps sayihg he knows him from years back i.e 10 years or more. He's Levin's type of Republican. He was then and is now: Neoconish, ready to use the military and support war and ready to give people like Bush a pass

Levin sounds different because there's a Democrat in the White House. He's still pro-empire, pro-war and an incoherent lunatic.

See this for what they're up to:
http://lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo253.html

And dont forget they hate our guts.

Ted Cruz said he opposed the growth of government during the Bush presidency in his CPAC speech. He also voted against foreign aid. Not sure where he stood on previous wars because he doesn't talk about them. I agree that on Iran, he tends to be overly hawkish. When Cruz actually votes for war, then I'm alright with denouncing him. Until then, I'm not going to judge him on that. Domestically, he's definitely up there with Lee and Cruz.

Also, is a friend really enough to disqualify him? I'm sure there's people on here that have friends that are liberal, neoconservative, socialist, nationalist, etc. Doesn't mean they agree with them on everything.

 

[Warlord]

Ted Cruz said he opposed the growth of government during the Bush presidency in his CPAC speech. He also voted against foreign aid. Not sure where he stood on previous wars because he doesn't talk about them. I agree that on Iran, he tends to be overly hawkish. When Cruz actually votes for war, then I'm alright with denouncing him. Until then, I'm not going to judge him on that. Domestically, he's definitely up there with Lee and Cruz.

Also, is a friend really enough to disqualify him? I'm sure there's people on here that have friends that are liberal, neoconservative, socialist, nationalist, etc. Doesn't mean they agree with them on everything.

Look at his PAC, these aren't just his friends it's who they raise money for and support in the GOP. All neocons.

 

[compromise]

Look at his PAC, these aren't just his friends it's who they raise money for and support in the GOP. All neocons.

Not really. Dean Heller definitely isn't a neocon. Connie Mack and Tom Graves were pretty good too. It is a PAC than helps friends of the Bush family, but it's not necessarily ideologically neoconservative in its endorsements. I believe that PAC shows some preference to candidates of ethnic minority origin.

 

[Brett85]

Hmmm. Is Alex Jones becoming mainstream?

 

[jmdrake]

Hmmm. Is Alex Jones becoming mainstream?

Rachel Maddow's attack on Ron Paul via Alex Jones may have done Jones more good than harm. For her to poo-poo every conspiracy, including the proven fact that the DHS is buying a ridiculously unjustifiable amount of bullets, makes Jones' "crazy" conspiracies look sane to republicans smart enough to realize that there is at least something afoul in D.C.