Alex Jones' flagship pirate radio station shut down for operating illegally

[donnay]

On Fox news, Breit Baier just reported this as if it's all true - that the FCC shut down Alex Jone's station and that twitter shut him down about a "battle rifle" comment, without ever saying what the comment was. They even briefly showed Ajit Pai talking and presented the clip as if it was from today and he was talking specifically about Alex Jone being shut down. In the clip, Pai never actually referred to Alex Jones - just said something about stations not being shut down because of the content, but over something else.

Brett Baier is no friend to Liberty--not surprising at all.

 

[Valli6]

Brett Baier is no friend to Liberty--not surprising at all.

Still, I expected they would make some attempt to appear less blatant about supporting the entire media narrative - but no, they played along with the whole thing.

 

[donnay]

Still, I expected they would make some attempt to appear less blatant about supporting the entire media narrative - but no, they played along with the whole thing.

You might see something mentioned from Tucker and Ingraham in a good light. They have been reporting about the censorship. Brett Baier is an ass. Remember how he acted in the debates with Ron Paul. He and Chris Wallace are both sycophants to their handlers and distort the truth as they are told.

That's fair and balanced--Truth Vs. Lies. They report, you decide.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

Brett Baier is no friend to Liberty--not surprising at all.

Better an open enemy than a false friend.

I'll take 100 Baiers, Hannitys, or even (gasp) O'Reilleys over a pied piper like Jones.

 

[donnay]

Better an open enemy than a false friend.

I'll take 100 Baiers, Hannitys, or even (gasp) O'Reilleys over a pied piper like Jones.

That's your opinion and it is duly noted. Jones has been more right than he has been wrong. I'll stick with him, Thanks.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

That's your opinion and it is duly noted. Jones has been more right than he has been wrong. I'll stick with him, Thanks.

He's done massive damage to the liberty movement, first by associating it with general goofiness, then by harnessing it to Trump.

He could hardly have done more if he'd tried (and maybe he did).

 

[donnay]

He's done massive damage to the liberty movement, first by associating it with general goofiness, then by harnessing it to Trump.

He could hardly have done more if he'd tried (and maybe he did).

Again, that is your opinion, not mine. You clearly have an axe to grind. As I see it, Jones has helped the cause for liberty in more ways than one and woke up a lot of people in the process. He gave Ron Paul a platform and still does. That doesn't mean I agree with Jones on everything, but he has been right about more things than he has been wrong, so with those odds, I'll stick with him, like I said.

 

[Danke]

Better an open enemy than a false friend.

I'll take 100 Baiers, Hannitys, or even (gasp) O'Reilleys over a pied piper like Jones.

How many hours have you listen to AJ's shows?

 

[r3volution 3.0]

Again, that is your opinion, not mine.

Yes, things that people say are generally their own opinions.

You clearly have an axe to grind. As I see it, Jones has helped the cause for liberty in more ways than one and woke up a lot of people in the process. He gave Ron Paul a platform and still does. That doesn't mean I agree with Jones on everything, but he has been right about more things than he has been wrong, so with those odds, I'll stick with him, like I said.

That's unfortunate.

How many hours have you listen to AJ's shows?

Once upon a time, I listened to his shows fairly regularly.

Then I soured on his bad acting.

Then I realized what an embarrassment he was to the movement.

Then, when he turned on Rand and started Trump-humping, I realized that he was something much worse than an embarrassment.

 

[Danke]

Yes, things that people say are generally their own opinions.



That's unfortunate.



Once upon a time, I listened to his shows fairly regularly.

Then I soured on his bad acting.

Then I realized what an embarrassment he was to the movement.

Then, when he turned on Rand and started Trump-humping, I realized that he was something much worse than an embarrassment.

Then you know Rand has appeared on his show after his criticism. And you know he went ballistic after Trump lobbed some Tomahawks into Syria.

He bombastic at time, we all know that. But he is factually correct over 90% of the time.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

Then you know Rand has appeared on his show after his criticism.

Rand appears on Hannity.

As Rand has no doubt learned to his extreme displeasure, you have to interact with all kinds of hobgoblins to get the message out.

It's not an endorsement of the hobgoblin.

And you know he went ballistic after Trump lobbed some Tomahawks into Syria.

And he's now back on the Trump train, I'm sure.

...talking about how the New World Ord...excuse me...terminology change...Deep State is plotting against Dear Leader, no?

He bombastic at time, we all know that. But he is factually correct over 90% of the time.

I'm not interested in the facts he's stating (which can generally be obtained elsewhere, or are unimportant).

I'm interested in how he uses his influence to lead astray libertarian-leaning people.

It's exactly the same as with Molyneux, except Jones is a much better conman.

 

[donnay]

Rand appears on Hannity.

As Rand has no doubt learned to his extreme displeasure, you have to interact with all kinds of hobgoblins to get the message out.

It's not an endorsement of the hobgoblin.



And he's now back on the Trump train, I'm sure.

...talking about how the New World Ord...excuse me...terminology change...Deep State is plotting against Dear Leader, no?



I'm not interested in the facts he's stating (which can generally be obtained elsewhere, or are unimportant).

I'm interested in how he uses his influence to lead astray libertarian-leaning people.

It's exactly the same as with Molyneux, except Jones is a much better conman.

No the terminology has not changed at all, but of course, you don't listen regularly so you wouldn't know that. So your opinion is based on ignorance of what you think he has been saying.

If you're looking for a Libertarian view point you ought to tune in to David Knight 8 to 11 (CST) Monday - Friday. Oh and Youtube dropped his live show August 6, stating they got "A Complaint" so they just shut him down. The lovely censorship of the Technocracy is alive and well.

Wait until the banks stop you from withdrawing your money because they had "A Complaint" on you, so you cannot have your money. You know private property and all, right?

 

[r3volution 3.0]

No the terminology has not changed at all, but of course, you don't listen regularly so you wouldn't know that. So your opinion is based on ignorance of what you think he has been saying.

It's true, I'm insufficiently masochistic to listen to him these days.

But he really doesn't talk about the "deep state"?

I find that hard to believe.

If you're looking for a Libertarian view point you ought to tune in to David Knight 8 to 11 (CST) Monday - Friday. Oh and Youtube dropped his live show August 6, stating they got "A Complaint" so they just shut him down. The lovely censorship of the Technocracy is alive and well

No thanks

I'll just obtain facts from various sources and draw my own conclusions: not in need of a guru.

Wait until the banks stop you from withdrawing your money because they had "A Complaint" on you, so you cannot have your money. You know private property and all, right?

I'm not sure why you're under the impression that theft is consistent with private property rights.