Alex Jones censored from New York Times bestseller list?

[jct74]

Alex Jones’ ‘Great Reset’ book hits #1 best selling non-fiction book in America, but the New York Times REFUSES to list it

JD Heyes
September 18, 2022

(Natural News) More left-wing bias by one of the country’s oldest newspapers was in evidence again this week after Infowars founder Alex Jones’ new book topped non-fiction lists.

“The Great Reset: And the War for the World” soared to No. 1 and actually outsold the non-fiction title atop The New York Times bestseller list but the legacy outlet refused to list it.

“Total consumer preorders from 8/10 to 8/30 were 24,739 copies from Amazon alone, with 11,297 copies ordered during the publication week, for a total of 36,036 copies sold,” noted a press release from Jones’ organization.

“‘I’m Glad My Mom Died’ by Jennette McCurdy, which sold 34,686 units this week, was listed as #1 on the New York Times bestseller list. ‘Breaking History,’ by Jared Kushner, sold 13,356 copies in the same week, and was listed as #2. ‘The Great Reset’ is #6 right now on the Amazon weekly bestseller list for all books sold in all genres and formats,” the release continued.

“In just a little over a week’s time there are already 417 Amazon customer reviews with a remarkable average of 4.9 out of 5.0 stars. The Great Reset sold nine times as many copies as the #15 book on the New York Times list, ‘Vacuuming in the Nude’ by Peggy Rowe, which sold a grand total of 3,587 copies,” the release noted further.

...

read more:
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-09...et-book-best-selling-nonfiction-book-nyt.html

 

[acptulsa]

"All the news that's fit to print." And if it doesn't fit the agenda, then...

 

[69360]

I think it see the problem. Perhaps it was #1 in fiction.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I think it see the problem. Perhaps it was #1 in fiction.

I've read the book.

Say what you want about Jones, but nothing in the book is out of bounds crazy.

It either has already happened, is happening or is entirely possible of happening in the near future.

 

[donnay]

The book is things Jones has been warning about for years so, if you think he is crazy then we are definitely living in crazy times.

It is time to unite because, if we don't stand united, now, we will fall for anything--and that will be the destruction of our country.

 

[vita3]

I've read the book.

Say what you want about Jones, but nothing in the book is out of bounds crazy.

It either has already happened, is happening or is entirely possible of happening in the near future.

I'm sure he comes across as less Histrionic in print form

Nice new source of revenue for the "Conspiracy Entrepreneur"

 

[acptulsa]

It is time to unite because, if we don't stand united, now, we will fall for anything--and that will be the destruction of our country.

Uniting behind a batch of bullshitters isn't going to save the country. It'll just be fiddling while Rome burns.

 

[PAF]

The book is things Jones has been warning about for years so, if you think he is crazy then we are definitely living in crazy times.

It is time to unite because, if we don't stand united, now, we will fall for anything--and that will be the destruction of our country.

Does that mean you're willing to unite with the growing number of anarchists/Agorists who see past all of the charade? If so, I'd be thrilled to unite, welcome aboard!

 

[Anti Federalist]

I'm sure he comes across as less Histrionic in print form

Nice new source of revenue for the "Conspiracy Entrepreneur"

Meh, he's written plenty of other books.

Take it or leave it...no skin off my nose.

 

[acptulsa]

Does that mean you're willing to unite with the growing number of anarchists/Agorists who see past all of the charade? If so, I'd be thrilled to unite, welcome aboard!

Nah. That might do some good.

Besides, you're talking about people who aren't celebrities, and use big words. Not entertaining enough. If you can't feel good all the while you're saving the country, why bother?

 

[PAF]

Nah. That might do some good.

Besides, you're talking about people who aren't celebrities, and use big words. Not entertaining enough. If you can't feel good all the while you're saving the country, why bother?

Plus, who would buy and wear all of the elephant and donkey ball caps?

 

[Anti Federalist]

Does that mean you're willing to unite with the growing number of anarchists/Agorists who see past all of the charade? If so, I'd be thrilled to unite, welcome aboard!

Maybe after a good housecleaning...

At every Marxist riot I've seen over the past few years, the anarchist symbol was widely displayed.

Why are anarchists aligned with Marxists and burning my country down, and threatening to exterminate me?

If the state's monopoly on violence is simply going to be transferred to rioting mobs of DeShawns, Ta'Ne'Qas and flabby white Marxist weirdosexuals with nuclear hair dye, bad tattoos and ear gauges, then no thanks.

 

[acptulsa]

At every Marxist riot I've seen over the past few years, the anarchist symbol was widely displayed.

Why are anarchists aligned with Marxists and burning my country down, and threatening to exterminate me?

For the same reason that CIA agents strip down to thongs in Libertarian Party functions. To herd people like your wife away from paths that might accomplish something, and into neo-teocon astroturf efforts.

Come on, man. You know that inverted scarlet letter doesn't represent no government, or even less government. It's just a half-drawn pentagram. How does devil worship reject evil leaders, again, the way actual anarchy does?

 

[PAF]

Maybe after a good housecleaning...

At every Marxist riot I've seen over the past few years, the anarchist symbol was widely displayed.

Why are anarchists aligned with Marxists and burning my country down, and threatening to exterminate me?

The two are not mutual, so I suspect paid operatives. You know, to keep folks from joining up. Think about that, maybe you'll figure it out. Oh, and btw, check out Larken's new vid. I know the consensus is "yeah yeah I've seen him before blah blah blah", but he really hits it home in the CONstitution piece he just did.

 

[kahless]

I wonder if it is marketing for what they have planned using Jones as their useful servant.

 

[kahless]

Maybe after a good housecleaning...

At every Marxist riot I've seen over the past few years, the anarchist symbol was widely displayed.

Why are anarchists aligned with Marxists and burning my country down, and threatening to exterminate me?

If the state's monopoly on violence is simply going to be transferred to rioting mobs of DeShawns, Ta'Ne'Qas and flabby white Marxist weirdosexuals with nuclear hair dye, bad tattoos and ear gauges, then no thanks.

For the same reason that CIA agents strip down to thongs in Libertarian Party functions. To herd people like your wife away from paths that might accomplish something, and into neo-teocon astroturf efforts.

Check out "Schools of Thought" for Anarachism on Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism

They could be a believer in several listed other than Libertarian, Individualist or Free Market Anarchists. Probably Anarcho-Communists if I had to take a guess.

 

[acptulsa]

Anarcho-Communists

By strict definition, people who believe there should be no government, and government should own and control everything, simultaneously.

In other words, oxymoronic morons.

What do they have to do with agorists, besides misusing a certain word because they are confused, and like to be confusing?

 

[kahless]

By strict definition, people who believe there should be no government, and government should own and control everything, simultaneously.

In other words, oxymoronic morons.

What do they have to do with agorists, besides misusing a certain word because they are confused, and like to be confusing?

Abolition of state and rather common ownership, whatever that is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_schools_of_thought#Anarcho-communism

Anarcho-communism is a theory of anarchism which advocates the abolition of the state, markets, money, private property (while retaining respect for personal property) and capitalism in favor of common ownership of the means of production,[48][49] direct democracy and a horizontal network of voluntary associations and workers' councils with production and consumption based on the guiding principle: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need".[50][51]

Some forms of anarchist communism such as insurrectionary anarchism are strongly influenced by egoism and radical individualism, believing anarcho-communism is the best social system for the realization of individual freedom.[52][53][54][55] Most anarcho-communists view it as a way of reconciling the opposition between the individual and society

 

[PAF]

Check out "Schools of Thought" for Anarachism on Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism

They could be a believer in several listed other than Libertarian, Individualist or Free Market Anarchists. Probably Anarcho-Communists if I had to take a guess.

Of course Page 46 of An Agorist Primer is what I highly recommend, then start at the beginning so that it all makes sense. The book is a very short read and just might change ones outlook and life ;-)

https://www.kopubco.com/pdf/An_Agorist_Primer_by_SEK3.pdf


"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to [MENTION=12430]acptulsa[/MENTION] again."

 

[acptulsa]

Abolition of state and rather common ownership, whatever that is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_schools_of_thought#Anarcho-communism

More wikipropaganda? I'm not clicking on that.

I talked to several at the campground the night before the Rally for the Republic. You're talking about people who are paid by government to protest against government. This has nothing to do with agorism. These hypocrites are no reason for AF to shy away from voluntaryists. Why are we even talking about them?