I'm actually not sure whether or not 9/11 was an inside job, but the more I learn, the more I begin to question the government's story.
I'm with you on not being sure... but I'm sure of one thing: the 911 commission was a very effective ass cover for a lot of people, one way or the other. I don't believe the official story, simply because it's so implausible. Things like the fact that several of the "hijackers" are still alive and living the Middle East, or that the timelines offered by the FAA, the White House, and the 911 commission are all different. Or that the official story is that nothing survived a plane crash but a paper passport, or that the Pennsylvania crash left NO airplane debris. Don't even ask about WTC 7. All this stuff smells like someone's covering up for SOMETHING, be it incompetence or conspiracy.
Too many unasked questions, too many vested interests in the investigation, just like with the Warren Commission. I think Paul is right: when the students for 911 truth asked him if he would start a new 911 commission, he responded that whenever there's a government "commission" instead of a proper trial, it means that someone is covering up for something, and that a new government commission might not help things.
BTW, speaking of the magic bullet - do you know that that's still the official policy on JFK? One bullet traversed 15 layers of clothing, 7 layers of skin, approximately 15 inches of tissue, struck a tie knot, removed 4 inches of rib and shattered a radius bone - and the copper jacket remained perfectly intact. (wikipedia) I'm not a conspiracy nut, but the 911 commission's recounting of events is just as fishy as the magic bullet... and I don't trust either of them.
Last edited: