Airport body scanners - hi def pics

[devil21]

This is what they do. Instead of the low quality grainy-ish pics that fly across the tv screen during the news segments, here is what they actually see. And what they actually can do, at least according to the blog I got these pics from.

Now just reverse-negative and there's your naked woman. Even her tan lines are plainly visible.

How can people accept their children, wives, mothers and friends going through these things?? There better be a lawsuit already in the works.

 

[newbitech]

no kidding. I just read the big drudge headline. 300 of these scanners going out in 2010, maybe more.

got a link to that blog?

 

[newbitech]

nm..

 

[0zzy]

although I find this lady very attractive, I do believe this is a violation of privacy and everything America stands for.

Screw "show me your papers," now they just have to look through a scanner and can see you naked!

 

[Dieseler]

Well there ya go.
When will they install these outside all of the big sports arenas?
Why all the sweat over flying?
Someone said in another thread that they want to persuade more people not to fly, I think it was IP.
It fits in my opinion.
Control of movement can come from many different angles.
House lost value, can't sell, stuck.
No job, stuck.
Scared to fly because of the terrorist or refuse due to the scanners, stuck.
They are locking us down.
It's all coming together.

 

[Dieseler]

Look at it like this also.
Division in use once again.
How much of our population actually flies for work, pleasure or whatever on a regular basis?
I don't know the answer to that question but I guarantee you it is not enough people to cause a huge uproar over these scanners. Also, there is quite a few within that group who will just accept it anyway, you know they will and they know it also.
The ones who fly only on Holidays will just stop flying or go another way... Perhaps they will settle for a phone call (monitored) or a conference call (monitored).
People who don't fly at all will not likely give a damn at all.
Some will but not many.
I for example do not fly but I do care and I will be in the minority of that group.
Divide and conquer.

 

[torchbearer]

Look at it like this also.
Division in use once again.
How much of our population actually flies for work, pleasure or whatever on a regular basis?
I don't know the answer to that question but I guarantee you it is not enough people to cause a huge uproar over these scanners. Also, there is quite a few within that group who will just accept it anyway, you know there are.

People who don't fly at all will not likely give a damn at all.
Some will but not many.
I for example do not fly but I do care and I will be in the minority of that group.
Divide and conquer.

fyi- your avatar is depicting a Knight of St. John's of Jerusalem.

 

[Dieseler]

fyi- your avatar is depicting a Knight of St. John's of Jerusalem.

Yeah I know, I was being sort of a dick, I'll probably change it to Dimebag Darrell or something later.
How bout that one instead?
Roll Tide!

 

[dannno]

Wow, that really shows how incredible the technology actually is.

It's like they do the reverse-negative thing just so you can't see people's skin.

 

[Danke]

Wow, that really shows how incredible the technology actually is.

It's like they do the reverse-negative thing just so you can't see people's skin.

Didn't they use to sell glasses in the back of boys' magazines that could do that?

 

[Matt Collins]

Wow Someone should stand at the airport and hand out these photos with a description just before people are about to walk through TSA. That should change some minds!

 

[Revolution_Ready]

There is a gun in those pics???

I stared at them for hours and didn't see it.

 

[Dieseler]

Wow Someone should stand at the airport and hand out these photos with a description just before people are about to walk through TSA. That should change some minds!

Good idea.
Mass email it also and see if Snopes cares to counter it.

 

[devil21]

Sorry I should have posted the blog link but my history automatically clears daily and I don't remember the link. If anybody finds it please post it to this thread.

 

[talkingpointes]

Wow Someone should stand at the airport and hand out these photos with a description just before people are about to walk through TSA. That should change some minds!

How bout a young girl with a slogan like "nice rack". I know that sounds disgusting and maybe a bit extreme but seriously WTF WTF WTF. What is this country coming too, and look at my previous post, I hardly ever express genuine outrage. Imagine the fucking creeps that will be working these things, also imagine if they save the photos. Jesus fucking christ, have some decency !

 

[dannno]

Didn't they use to sell glasses in the back of boys' magazines that could do that?

Apparently, but I think it was a gag.

 

[Dieseler]

Sorry I should have posted the blog link but my history automatically clears daily and I don't remember the link. If anybody finds it please post it to this thread.

Here's one,
http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/bild-e...itals/what-can-naked-scanners-really-see.html

Prison Planet picked up also.
http://www.infowars.com/inverted-body-scanner-image-shows-naked-body-in-full-living-color/

I just submitted it to Drudge.
Drudge is running the mind reading article by the way.

 

[dannno]

Good idea.
Mass email it also and see if Snopes cares to counter it.

Actually all you have to do is take the original photo into photoshop and do a negative filter on it.

Anybody with photo tools can debunk this if it's debunkable. I guess I'll try it, I think I have that tool with Artweaver.

 

[Dieseler]

Actually all you have to do is take the original photo into photoshop and do a negative filter on it.

Anybody with photo tools can debunk this if it's debunkable. I guess I'll try it, I think I have that tool with Artweaver.

Just read on another forum that members there have already confirmed it is possible.
I'd appreciate it if you would though man, I don't have the skills with those type programs but would love a confirmation from a member here.

 

[dannno]

Just read on another forum that members there have already confirmed it is possible.
I'd appreciate it if you would though man, I don't have the skills with those type programs but would love a confirmation from a member here.

Ok, so I took the original image where her skin is all silver and put it into artweaver (which is a free download, great photoshop clone if you want one)

I right-clicked on the layer (layers are the small version of the picture in a box over on the right) and went to layer properties.

For "Blend:" I selected "Difference" and that gave me a reverse negative, precisely the same picture that is in the OP where she looks nekked.

So that's step 1 for confirmation.

To completely confirm this, we should be able to get other scanner photos, like the ones on erowe1's website, do the same thing in Artweaver (or photoshop), and get a picture of a nekked person.


Edit: It seems that erowe1's scanner images have changed since the other day.. I could be wrong tho.. the female pic ix the same as this one, and the male pic is very blurred, I thought it was a little more clear the other day, I dunno.

Somebody should find a good one and post it here, I can run the filter (or people can do it themselves for their own verification)