AIDS and EBOLA

stilltrying

Banned
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
279
Aids and Ebola

The book: Emerging Viruses: AIDS and EBOLA

Interview of Leonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A.., M.P.H. by Gary Null 1995. http://www.garynull.com/ http://www.tetrahedron.org/

NULL: What evidence can you present on these diseases, Ebola, Marburg, AIDS?

HOROWITZ: One of the things which we publish is the "Special Virus Cancer Programme" and the information that comes out of that programme, what might be called a secret cancer virus programme that was conducted between 1962 and 1974 by researchers at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in co-operation with biological weapons developers for the dept of Defence, and in those documents it shows very clearly that what those researchers did was that they took things like the Simian monkey virus (SV40), and they essentially extracted the DNA out of it and they infused it with other types of nucleic acids like RNA from cat leukaemia, from chicken sarcoma, and that created a mutant, a new kind of germ, which still had a difficult time infecting humans. And because these researchers were investigating human cancers and human vaccines, allegedly for the prevention of human cancers they then cultured these types of organisms in human cell cultures or in foetal tissues which created what’s called surface membrane changes, such as in the AIDS virus it’s called GP120 proteins on the external envelope that would allow these new mutants to attach to the human membranes, be carried across the cell membranes, enter the genes of the cell, or the genome of the cell, then essentially do everything the AIDS viruses do, or other viruses are alleged to do, if you take into consideration that HIV may not be the sole cause of AIDS.

So I look back on the early history, of for example Dr Gallo had come out with clearly a false speculation that stated that the African Green monkey (AGM) bit an African and then a Portuguese seaman who carried this virus over to Portugal some 500 years ago, and the evidence we have from the scientific literature shows clearly that the Simian Green Monkey for example never had these types of AIDS like viruses in them. In fact the history shows that Maurice Hillman at Merck who was the chief vaccine developer imported the AGM into the US specifically because it did not have these viruses that they were finding were breaking out in their laboratories and therefore creating a major risk in the incorporation of them into the vaccines that they were developing at the time, and I am sure on your travels you have learned recently that some of the polio vaccines, the old polio vaccines, and even some of the ones used today may be containing viruses such as Cytomegalovirus or what Dr Martin calls the stealth virus, and the issue as I see it is that these emerging viruses were emerging from the NCI researchers laboratories.

They were not emerging from the wild, so today the Blacks have been blamed for AIDS. The gays have been blamed for AIDS. The monkeys have been blamed for AIDS & Ebola, and you know what? That is a bunk, complete bull. The truth of the matter is that the NCI researchers in co-operation with a narrow network of virologists who are being paid by the Dept of Defence to investigate these types of viruses, and the viral vaccines made from them. Their biohazard and containment in their facilities were abysmal, and just like the recent Texas outbreak of Ebola, the other outbreaks---we have had monkey AIDS outbreaks over half a dozen times in the major vaccine production labs, as well as the research labs---the reason for this is because once you create these viruses they are very easily transmitted from one animal to the other in these facilities, and that as I see it is where viruses are emerging from.

NULL: The evidence is going to have to be submitted to convince this audience. A lot of people have made these in the past. We have all seen or heard of the Strecker memorandum, and Dr Eva Snead, but no one has had actual documents except for some document presented of some research being planned, but I want some specifics. First one thought, no ad hominem attacks, I want the documentation……

NULL. How was it made, why was it made?

HOROWITZ: I can tell you for sure that if there is, and I believe there is, a particle known as HIV, I can tell you absolutely for sure that Dr Robert Gallo…….based on research from publications of 1970 of the proceedings of the National Academy of Scientists, and in 1971 Nature New Biology, Robert Gallo and his associates at Litton Bionetics which was 6th on the list of major army biological weapons contractors for 1969, directly out of the congressional record, is my citation there Gary, that these folks clearly created numerous AIDS like viruses in their labs.

More
 
Horrowitz claims that the H1N1 vaccine is being used to exterminate Muslims. I was unaware that the vaccine could descriminate between religions of people. The alleged chemical is found in everyday items like ice cream and cosmetics. In this piece he claims that HIV was invented in a government lab in the 1970s while cases go back at least as far as 1959. He is not a reliable source of info.

He has been discussed before.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=224858
 
^

Those cases in 1959 are not 100% confirmed and there is hardly any research to verify these claims. I'd like to hear more proof as the studies are extremely limited. Most of these pre-1970s cases are found at universities the same in which those who are accused could have easily funded.

I think Horowitz claims are pretty substantiated.
 
Last edited:
Can you substantiate his claim that the H1N1 vaccine is intended to wipe out Muslims? That it causes sterility?
 
Last edited:
^

Those cases in 1959 are not 100% confirmed and there is hardly any research to verify these claims. I'd like to hear more proof as the studies are extremely limited. Most of these pre-1970s cases are found at universities the same in which those who are accused could have easily funded.

I think Horowitz claims are pretty substantiated.

I earlier provided a link which listed at least a dozen cases identified before 1972. I did concede that there was question on one of the 1959 cases (there were two).

Here is another list of some of the cases if you would like to go over it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_AIDS The British case from 1959 is stronger than the Congolese one from the same year.
 
Back
Top