Against Woman Suffrage by Lysander Spooner

Truth Warrior said:
I don't. Not ANY since 1972. :)
Click to expand...


You're making me giggle. This is also starting to remind me of
http://www.vhemt.org/aboutvhemt.htm#vhemt


colorvisualize.jpg
 
HollyforRP said:
You're making me giggle. This is also starting to remind me of
http://www.vhemt.org/aboutvhemt.htm#vhemt


colorvisualize.jpg
Click to expand...

I visualize our eventual species extinction, at our own hands ( STATE ), THROUGH the barbaric sociopathic cult. < no giggles, DEAD serious >

"By their fruits, ye shall know them."


"We shall get nowhere until we start by recognizing that political behavior is largely non-rational, that the world is suffering from some kind of mental disease which must be diagnosed before it can be cured. " -- George Orwell
 
Last edited:
Spooner's great. I guess people don't tend to understand irony any better now than they did then. Or liberty.
 
This explains a lot but it does't SOLVE anything. If people didn't vote we would never have heard of Ron Paul. So no maky any sense!

Burning statute books sounds FANTASTIC! But in reality, how would women get enough support to go do that, even if symbolic?

See I want real solutions, not DON'T VOTE. That's a cop out. You are either part of the solution or part of the problem.

Nice post Truth Warrior.
 
RonPaulNewbee said:
This explains a lot but it does't SOLVE anything. If people didn't vote we would never have heard of Ron Paul. So no maky any sense!

Burning statute books sounds FANTASTIC! But in reality, how would women get enough support to go do that, even if symbolic?

See I want real solutions, not DON'T VOTE. That's a cop out. You are either part of the solution or part of the problem.

Nice post Truth Warrior.
Click to expand...
If people didn't vote we wouldn't NEED Ron Paul. DUH!!! BTW, Ron has neither passed nor stopped ANY bill from becoming law ( so called ).

YOU are part of the problem. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Truth Warrior said:
If people didn't vote we wouldn't NEED Ron Paul. DUH!!! BTW, Ron has neither passed nor stopped ANY bill from becoming law ( so called ).

YOU are part of the problem. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

By implication you are being incorrect. Ron Paul is a lawmaker. That is his job. Prove otherwise, TW!

Has he been successful in shepherding bills? That's another story! But he has tried! I don't get the logic about people voting and therefore we need Ron. He doesn't just vote against things. He has a specific agenda. The Constitution is not about anarchy. Feel free to vote or not vote but please don't be an idiot. I like your posts too much when you are on your medication.
 
RonPaulNewbee said:
By implication you are being incorrect. Ron Paul is a lawmaker. That is his job. Prove otherwise, TW!

Has he been successful in shepherding bills? That's another story! But he has tried! I don't get the logic about people voting and therefore we need Ron. He doesn't just vote against things. He has a specific agenda. The Constitution is not about anarchy. Feel free to vote or not vote but please don't be an idiot. I like your posts too much when you are on your medication.
Click to expand...

That's his job. It's just a frickin law factory, for Pete's sake. Find the laws he's made. They call Ron, Dr. NO for some reason.

There is NO logic about voting, it's ALL just "brainwashing", hype, PR, "spin" and BS. Voters are a MINORITY in this country. Get a clue.

Hey, you're the politics junkie and voting addict. Take the cure. :p :rolleyes:

"The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable, and so, if he is romantic, he tries to change it. And even if he is not romantic personally he is very apt to spread discontent among those who are." -- H.L. Mencken
 
Last edited:
Truth Warrior said:
That's his job. Find the laws he's made. There is NO logic about voting, it's ALL just "brainwashing", hype, PR and BS. Voters are a MINORITY in this country. Get a clue.

Hey, you're the politics junkie and voting addict. Take the cure. :p :rolleyes:

[/B]
Click to expand...

True I've become a politics junkie but I waited a Loooooooong Time and the first time I voted was in 2000, against Bush. I saw that POS coming a mile away. I vote against Bush again in 2004. And I would have voted for RP last week if he had stayed on the ballot.

RON PAUL 2012!
 
RonPaulNewbee said:
True I've become a politics junkie but I waited a Loooooooong Time and the first time I voted was in 2000, against Bush. I saw that POS coming a mile away. I vote against Bush again in 2004. And I would have voted for RP last week if he had stayed on the ballot.

RON PAUL 2012!
Click to expand...

Gee, maybe Ron might get to 2.4 million votes in 2012. :rolleyes: I think Ron is too smart to run again. He's earned, and probably wants his retirement soon.<IMHO> IF he runs, I'll be surprised.
 
Last edited:
RonPaulNewbee said:
True I've become a politics junkie but I waited a Loooooooong Time and the first time I voted was in 2000, against Bush. I saw that POS coming a mile away. I vote against Bush again in 2004. And I would have voted for RP last week if he had stayed on the ballot.

RON PAUL 2012!
Click to expand...

What if RP was for ending federal spending on research?
 
I think the 10 commandments would keep almost everyone in line. Especially if the penalty for breaking them was death.

All the other laws are just BS in my opinion.
 
Danke said:
What if RP was for ending federal spending on research?
Click to expand...

I know RP was for ending it! But I still voted for him in the primary!

The question would then be: What would I do? I'd try to get some appointment to see how I could help, though I'm sure I'm not qualified for a cabinet level position. I do know that Ron said he'd take it very slow. The ship is huge and you don't just slam on the brakes and hang a "U-ie". It's 140 years of undoing that's needed. But I do believe there is a place for govt. research and other programs that ideologues never take into consideration. That's why I'm here from the government ... I'm here to help!

Hahaha! Bet you just blew milk out of your nose!
 
RonPaulNewbee said:
I know RP was for ending it! But I still voted for him in the primary!

The question would then be: What would I do? I'd try to get some appointment to see how I could help, though I'm sure I'm not qualified for a cabinet level position. I do know that Ron said he'd take it very slow. The ship is huge and you don't just slam on the brakes and hang a "U-ie". It's 140 years of undoing that's needed. But I do believe there is a place for govt. research and other programs that ideologues never take into consideration. That's why I'm here from the government ... I'm here to help!

Hahaha! Bet you just blew milk out of your nose!
Click to expand...
Make that 220 years of undoing. :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Voluntarist
One For tod evans - Equal Custody (Kentucky)
Replies
2
Views
36
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
PAF
Why Shouldn’t Trump Be Convicted and Impeached for Murder?
Replies
19
Views
91
acptulsa
acptulsa
PAF
Independence Now and Independence Forever
Replies
1
Views
23
Snowball
Snowball
Swordsmyth
Trump upends DOJ's Civil Rights Division, sparking 'bloodbath' in senior ranks
Replies
9
Views
54
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Occam's Banana
Epstein victims press conference [WED 03 SEP 2025 10:30 AM EST]
2
Replies
36
Views
275
TheTexan
TheTexan
Back
Top