AG Barr sent Federal Agents to Ballot Counting Centers

As you're such a smart fellow, maybe you could explain.
I Am and I have.
They are called Federal Fusion Centers. Secret Police work there.

FBI has always been a Political Arm of govt. accepted by both sides generally.

I would have prefer Federal Marshals Hold and Count publicly. and done Transparently.
 
Do you have a better name for a Republic where a sitting president sends in the armed secret police to “control” how the votes are counted than:

ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?550221-Banana Republic

HUH?

LIBERTARIAN PARTY PREAMBLE


We believe that respect for individual rights is the essential precondition for a free and prosperous world, that force and fraud must be banished from human relationships, and that only through fr

We believe that respect for individual rights is the essential precondition for a free and prosperous world, that force and fraud must be banished from human relationships, and that only through freedom can peace and prosperity be realized.

I mereley seek to ABOLISH / CRIMINALIZE ELECTORAL FRAUD

.
 
Last edited:
We believe that respect for individual rights is the essential precondition for a free and prosperous world, that force and fraud must be banished from human relationships, and that only through freedom can peace and prosperity be realized.

I mereley seek to ABOLISH / CRIMINALIZE ELECTORAL FRAUD
There is no place for intelligence agencies in a “democracy” whatsoever.
Why do you believe that these armed “federal agents” aren’t committing fraud in “controlling” how the votes are counted?!? Because Biden is even worse than Trump?



I Am and I have.
They are called Federal Fusion Centers. Secret Police work there.

You “have”? Where did you, before this post; in another thread?!?
Thanks though; I honestly didn’t know about this flavour of “secret police”.

Are you really saying that these can be trusted? You sort of admit that they’re (at least in part) “secret police”
The National Network of Fusion Centers was established after the September 11 attacks to allow collaboration across jurisdictions in order to respond to criminal and terrorist activity. It is a decentralized, distributed, self-organizing network of individual fusion centers and their respective partners within each center's area of responsibility. The process is a method of managing the flow of information and intelligence across levels and sectors of government to integrate information for analysis.[1] Fusion centers rely on the active involvement of state, local, tribal, and federal law enforcement agencies—and sometimes on non-law enforcement agencies—to provide intelligence for their analysis. The intent is that, as the diversity of information sources increases, there will be more accurate and robust analysis that can be disseminated as intelligence.

There are a number of documented criticisms of fusion centers, including relative ineffectiveness at counterterrorism activities, the potential to be used for secondary purposes unrelated to counterterrorism, and their links to violations of civil liberties of American citizens and others.[7] One such fusion center has been involved with spying on anti-war and peace activists as well as anarchists in Washington state.[12]
David Rittgers of the Cato Institute has noted:
a long line of fusion center and DHS reports labeling broad swaths of the public as a threat to national security. The North Texas Fusion System labeled Muslim lobbyists as a potential threat; a DHS analyst in Wisconsin thought both pro- and anti-abortion activists were worrisome; a Pennsylvania homeland security contractor watched environmental activists, Tea Party groups, and a Second Amendment rally; the Maryland State Police put anti-death penalty and anti-war activists in a federal terrorism database; a fusion center in Missouri thought that all third-party voters and Ron Paul supporters were a threat; and the Department of Homeland Security described half of the American political spectrum as "right wing extremists."[13]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_center
 
Eh.

Not a single flagrant illegal act by the Democrats has been prosecuted in 4 years. Hillary servers. Hillary stealing Democrat primary from Bernie. Awan brothers. Wasserman-Schultz and Becerra cover-ups. Obamagate. Biden influence peddling. There is no reason to believe that election fraud will result in anything.
This exposes the cognitive dissonance that leftists have. They think Clinton and Biden cheated Bernie in the primaries, but when it comes to the general election, they think Biden is winning legitimately.
 
Unfortunately Barr isn't going to do shit.

He showed his true colors when he decided it was "political" to allow the American people to know what the Democratic "resistance" did in 2016 prior to the 2020 election.
 
Unfortunately Barr isn't going to do shit.

He showed his true colors when he decided it was "political" to allow the American people to know what the Democratic "resistance" did in 2016 prior to the 2020 election.

Yeah, I don’t trust him (or his department) to do anything other than delay.

But there is something a bit off about an AG investigating this. He is a member of the administration, with a vested interest. Policing elections is tricky business. So many biased parties can get involved.
 
Yeah, I don’t trust him (or his department) to do anything other than delay.

But there is something a bit off about an AG investigating this. He is a member of the administration, with a vested interest. Policing elections is tricky business. So many biased parties can get involved.

Unfortunately the same can be said about the blue states bureaucracy.

Secondly , if they wanted to be transparent they would have allowed Republican poll watchers.

Thirdly, Whistleblowers and affiants have provided evidence of wrong doing.

.
 
Back
Top