liberalnurse
Member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2007
- Messages
- 1,073
1) The Obama team had a winning strategy of focusing on very UNLIKELY voters and the rest is a sad history. He won by a small margin in Iowa, every unlikely vote counted.
2) Many of us know Dems that are unhappy with Obama, and see Ron Paul as a very viable option, especially agreeing with him on social issues where Obama has failed them.
3) Many of RPF members are former Obama supporters we are fortunate to have in our ranks.
4) Obama is running unopposed until the general. There is nothing lost for liberals to switch over.
5) In many states it is easy to register on election day.
6) Ron Paul has more crossover support from liberals than any Republican candidate.
7) Ron Paul polls highest among independents.
8) The general election will be won by independents. Why wait until the general to gain their support when we need them now?
9) In interviews, Ron himself often mentions his support from liberals and independents.
10) CPAC 2010, lost ONE vote.
11) Many Republicans who like Ron will still go with their "safe and electable" candidate.
In the end, with that said, what is wrong with a multi-pronged approach?
Thats my argument and it's working among the Dems and Indies. I ask them, What have you got to lose. Lets see the old school, school the new school. Imagine Ron Paul and Obama in a debate. They like it.