After Nice, Newt Gingrich wants to ‘test’ every Muslim in the U.S. and deport sharia believers

I see typical RPFer's instead of being outraged about the little babies, children, women and men being run over, the outraged is directed at those who want to stop it from coming or happening here.

There should be a moratorium on immigration from terrorist nations (the Rand plan) and I would take it a step further with a temporary ban on all Muslims (the Trump plan). Deportations should begin on all illegal Muslims and then expire all ones here on visa - deport.

We are at war against a religion and ideology diametrically opposed to individual liberty. Where is the outrage against those that believe in Sharia in the US and convert or die? Are we really going to ignore that by allowing those that hold this ideology are allowed to grow in numbers here that they will rewrite are laws and attack us for our beliefs until they get their way?

The establishment politicians, MSM and libertarian elites that are against what I am saying are very well off. They would never be in a public place that would risk their lives or that of their families or friends in a terrorist attack. They live behind their walled compound or are in their travels behind the compound of their friends or family or businesses. They do not give a damn and are willing to risk the lives of the average Americans for open borders as long as they profit from the cheap migrant labor. The rest are more than willing to sacrifice their lives as cucks to people that hate us, our beliefs and want to kill us.

I bet you also support(ed) the USA PATRIOT Act, too. Giving up liberty for "security."
 
Last edited:
The new issue of Charlie Hebdo features drawings of the Orlando terror attack and Donald Trump.

Collapsed in pools of blood outside a darkened Pulse nightclub, four cartoon bodies lay beside a giant Donald Trump caricature that is screaming anti-immigrant rhetoric – a provocative drawing that adorns the new cover of France’s satirical Charlie Hebdo magazine.
An angry Trump points and yells in a word bubble at Muslim immigrants “who come to kill” gay people. Several translations of Hebdo’s original French wording reveal profane versions for “immigrants” and “gay people.”

I hate it when the media brings up Charlie Hebdo as if I should feel sorry for that scum of the earth. I do not believe they deserved to be killed but they truly are the scum of the earth. Now it sounds like they are giving a helping propaganda hand to the very people that killed their fellow employees and still wants to kill them to. Yep, scumbags.
 
Last edited:
I see typical RPFer's instead of being outraged about the little babies, children, women and men being run over, the outraged is directed at those who want to stop it from coming or happening here.

There should be a moratorium on immigration from terrorist nations (the Rand plan) and I would take it a step further with a temporary ban on all Muslims (the Trump plan). Deportations should begin on all illegal Muslims and then expire all ones here on visa - deport.

We are at war against a religion and ideology diametrically opposed to individual liberty. Where is the outrage against those that believe in Sharia in the US and convert or die? Are we really going to ignore that by allowing those that hold this ideology are allowed to grow in numbers here that they will rewrite are laws and attack us for our beliefs until they get their way?

The establishment politicians, MSM and libertarian elites that are against what I am saying are very well off. They would never be in a public place that would risk their lives or that of their families or friends in a terrorist attack. They live behind their walled compound or are in their travels behind the compound of their friends or family or businesses. They do not give a damn and are willing to risk the lives of the average Americans for open borders as long as they profit from the cheap migrant labor. The rest are more than willing to sacrifice their lives as cucks to people that hate us, our beliefs and want to kill us.

Actually, what I think is choice are those talking about the 1st Amendment, when many here want the entire country to die. You know, when there won't be any Constitution at all.
 
I bet you also support(ed) the USA PATRIOT Act, too. Giving up liberty for "security."

If you keep letting in Trojan Horse elements, we're going to be slapped with something ten times worse than the Patriot Act. That you can be assured of.
 
I bet you also support(ed) the USA PATRIOT Act, too. Giving up liberty for "security."

No, I hated it. But, that has ZERO to do with kicking non-citizen Muslims out of our country.

Not allowing non-citizen Muslims come into our country, at least until this jihad thing is over, is only common sense. NO NON-CITIZEN has any right to enter a country where they aren't welcomed. NADA.
 
No, I hated it. But, that has ZERO to do with kicking non-citizen Muslims out of our country.

Not allowing non-citizen Muslims come into our country, at least until this jihad thing is over, is only common sense. NO NON-CITIZEN has any right to enter a country where they aren't welcomed. NADA.

Lets set aside the obvious Constitutional issue here and we'll even set aside the moral debate. Who decides they are unwelcomed? The same government we can't trust? You? Boobus? Do you not see the issue here?
 
Another example and reminder of what is at risk.

France ‘Suppressed Reports of Gruesome Torture’ at Bataclan Massacre
http://heatst.com/uk/exclusive-france-suppressed-news-of-gruesome-torture-at-bataclan-massacre/
According to this testimony, Wahhabist killers reportedly gouged out eyes, castrated victims, and shoved their testicles in their mouths. They may also have disemboweled some poor souls. Women were reportedly stabbed in the genitals – and the torture was, victims told police, filmed for Daesh or Islamic State propaganda. For that reason, medics did not release the bodies of torture victims to the families, investigators said.

The risk is higher under a Clinton Presidency.

Clinton to Resettle One Million Muslim Migrants During First Term Alone
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...one-million-muslim-migrants-first-term-alone/
 
Lets set aside the obvious Constitutional issue here and we'll even set aside the moral debate. Who decides they are unwelcomed? The same government we can't trust? You? Boobus? Do you not see the issue here?

Absolutely, I do. I don't for one minute think they will stop it. They are allowing, even encouraging it, to help finish off the country. Doesn't mean I have to agree with them though.

My prayers are that Trump will, but that may very well be a pipe dream.
 
I see typical RPFer's instead of being outraged about the little babies, children, women and men being run over, the outraged is directed at those who want to stop it from coming or happening here.

There should be a moratorium on immigration from terrorist nations (the Rand plan) and I would take it a step further with a temporary ban on all Muslims (the Trump plan). Deportations should begin on all illegal Muslims and then expire all ones here on visa - deport.

We are at war against a religion and ideology diametrically opposed to individual liberty. Where is the outrage against those that believe in Sharia in the US and convert or die? Are we really going to ignore that by allowing those that hold this ideology to grow in numbers here that they will rewrite are laws and attack us for our beliefs until they get their way?

The establishment politicians, MSM and libertarian elites that are against what I am saying are very well off. They would never be in a public place that would risk their lives or that of their families or friends in a terrorist attack. They live behind their walled compound or are in their travels behind the compound of their friends or family or businesses. They do not give a damn and are willing to risk the lives of the average Americans for open borders as long as they profit from the cheap migrant labor. The rest are more than willing to sacrifice their lives as cucks to people that hate us, our beliefs and want to kill us.

We are NOT at war with a religion- we are at WAR because TPTB want ME resources and power over the globe.

Some of this is blowback and some of this is BS- Judge Napolitano told the world that according to the 911 reports, no deaths happened in Orlando until 5:30 AM- after the police showed up. So are we being played? Is it TPTB plan to have everybody hate each other and blame others so that they can take even more control?

Think about that.
 
France ‘Suppressed Reports of Gruesome Torture’ at Bataclan Massacre
According to this testimony, Wahhabist killers reportedly
gouged out eyes,
castrated victims,
and shoved their testicles in their mouths.
They may also have disemboweled some poor souls.
Women were reportedly stabbed in the genitals –
and the torture was, victims told police, filmed for Daesh or Islamic State propaganda.
http://heatst.com/uk/exclusive-france-suppressed-news-of-gruesome-torture-at-bataclan-massacre/

Never read THAT in the media...... did we? (until now)
I wonder why.

Molyneaux makes the point:

 
I can't imagine any possible downsides to giving the government the power to decide which people are entitled to rights and due process based upon their beliefs.
Me neither. I think we need to become more tolerant.
It's not them.... it's US. We're the problem.

 
Never read THAT in the media...... did we? (until now)
I wonder why.

Same as we don't hear about this stuff:

Prisoners raped by dogs, the ‘modern’ torture techniques of the US

“Afghan prisoners were tied face down on small chairs. Then fighting dogs entered the torture chamber. If the prisoners did not say anything useful, each dog got to take a turn on them. After procedure like these, they confessed everything. They would have even said that they killed Kennedy without even knowing who he was.”
http://www.hambastagi.org/new/engli...-the-modern-torture-techniques-of-the-us.html

And more:
The United Nations revealed Wednesday it has "credible and reliable" evidence that people recently detained at U.S. military prisons in Afghanistan have faced torture and abuse.

The UN's Assistance Mission and High Commissioner for Human Rights exposed the findings in a report based on interviews with 790 "conflict-related detainees" between February 2013 and December 2014.

According to the report, prevalent torture methods used by Afghan forces include, "prolonged and severe beating with cables, pipes, hoses or wooden sticks (including on the soles of the feet), punching, hitting and kicking all over the body including jumping on the detainee’s body, twisting of genitals including with a wrench-like device, and threats of execution and/or sexual assault."
http://www.commondreams.org/news/20...able-evidence-us-military-torture-afghanistan

Taguba's report stated that the following abuses happened in this incident:
- Punching, slapping, and kicking detainees; jumping on their naked feet.
- Videotaping and photographing naked male and female detainees.
- Forcibly arranging detainees in various sexually explicit positions for photographing.
- Forcing detainees to remove their clothing and keeping them naked for several days at a time.
- Forcing naked male detainees to wear women's underwear.
- Forcing groups of male detainees to masturbate themselves while being photographed and videotaped.
- Arranging naked male detainees in a pile and then jumping on them.
- Positioning a naked detainee on a box, with a sandbag on his head, and attaching wires to his fingers, toes, and penis to simulate electric torture.
- Writing "I am a Rapest (sic)" on the leg of a detainee accused of rape, and then photographing him naked.
- Placing a dog chain or strap around a naked detainee's neck and having a female soldier pose for a picture.
- A male MP guard having sex with a female detainee.
- Using military working dogs (without muzzles) to intimidate and frighten detainees, and in at least one case biting and severely injuring a detainee.
- Taking photographs of dead Iraqi detainees.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/30/world/meast/iraq-prison-abuse-scandal-fast-facts/
 
We have to destroy the Constitution to save the Constitution.

Where have I heard something like this before?

Where in your ethos did you ever hear that the U.S. Constitution applied to people who lived in other countries?
 
Where in your ethos did you ever hear that the U.S. Constitution applied to people who lived in other countries?

Apparently from the most important document in our history: the Declaration of Independence.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
 
Apparently from the most important document in our history: the Declaration of Independence.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Yes, the Declaration of Independence from Great Britain. Which has 0 to do with what we are talking about.

Which doesn't mean that citizens of other countries have any right to come into ours. Sheesh.
 
Back
Top