Afghanistan IG: Opium 'Crisis' a U.S. 'National Security Concern'

Origanalist

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
43,060
The U.S. inspector general for spending in Afghanistan (the what???) told the Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control that Afghanistan’s opium “crisis” is a U.S. national security concern because it destabilizes the country’s economy and it nourishes insurgent groups like the Taliban.

Top officials from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), who also testified, echoed the inspector general’s comment.


“Even though little of this opium hits American shores we all know that the narcotics crisis in Afghanistan is a national security concern because it distorts the Afghan economy, poisons its banking sector, fuels a growing illicit economy, undermines the legitimacy of the Afghan government by stoking corruption, nourishing criminal networks, and providing approximately 30 percent of the financial support to the Taliban and other insurgent groups,” John Sopko, the U.S. government’s special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction told the panel during a hearing yesterday.

“It also puts at risk the fragile reconstruction gains we have made over the last 12 years whether in health, education, women’s issues, rule of law, or governance.”

“Yet despite the growing threat of the narco-terrorist, [and] criminal nexus, the United States and other Western donors have by and large made counter-narcotics a lower strategic priority,” he also said.

The inspector general told the lawmakers at the hearing that the opium problem in Afghanistan threatens the U.S. mission to prevent terrorist safe havens there.

“In conclusion, the Afghan drug problem is growing and threatens to undermine the overall U.S. mission to build a stable Afghanistan able to defend itself and prevent terrorist groups from establishing sanctuaries there,” said Sopko. “Absent effective counter-narcotics programs and an Afghan political will, everything we have been investing both in lives and treasure will be at risk.”

Erin Logan, the principal director for the office of the deputy assistant secretary of defense for counter-narcotics and global threats, indicated that victory in Afghanistan is contingent upon dealing with the drug trade.

“As we look at the future of Afghanistan, it is impossible to envision success without sustaining an Afghan capability to fight the violence and corruption created by the drug trade,” she said.

Furthermore, she added that the the heroin trade in Afghanistan is a threat to the U.S.

“In addition, we cannot ignore the growing threat to ourselves and our allies. Our Canadian partners estimate that 90 percent of the heroin on their streets comes from Afghanistan,” she told the senators. “They also believe they are seeing more heroin on their streets than their user population can absorb. We must all be sensitive to information like this when combined with the Governor of Vermont recently issuing a State of the State speech focused entirely on Vermont’s exploding heroin problem.”

“We must be vigilant about the possibility of Afghan-produced heroin becoming more available across the U.S.,” she also said, later adding, “our adversaries make good use of these [illicit narcotics] networks [in Afghanistan] to destabilize territories and hurt U.S. interests.”

Echoing most of the witnesses, James Capra, the DEA’s chief of operations, told the Senate panel that Afghanistan’s drug trade fuels instability and threatens security in Afghanistan by facilitating transnational organized crime and undermining the rule of law.

He went on to say that the Taliban receives millions annually from activity surrounding the narcotics trade in Afghanistan through taxation, protection, and extortion.

continued at...http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/...ium-Crisis-is-a-U-S-National-Security-Concern
 
I would think the IG would be counting beans and not formulating opium policy for the Senate ....
 
“[T]he narcotics crisis in Afghanistan is a national security concern because it distorts the Afghan economy, poisons its banking sector, fuels a growing illicit economy, undermines the legitimacy of the Afghan government by stoking corruption, nourishing criminal networks, and providing approximately 30 percent of the financial support to the Taliban and other insurgent groups,” John Sopko, the U.S. government’s special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction told the panel during a hearing yesterday.

What's that you say, Mr. Government Flunkie Person? The War on Drugs has numerous deleterious effects such as distorting economies, poisoning banking sectors, fueling illicit markets, undermining governments, corrupting government officials, nourishing criminal networks and funding insurgent groups?

Well, that just sounds awful! Maybe we oughta do something about that ...
 
I would think the IG would be counting beans and not formulating opium policy for the Senate ....

Ya, you would think.....

373729_178081365556898_2144163852_q.jpg
United States Senator Mike Lee

Behold my display of the 2013 Federal Register. It contains over 80,000 pages of new rules, regulations, and notices all written and passed by unelected bureaucrats. The small stack of papers on top of the display are the laws passed by elected members of Congress and signed into law by the president.

1530434_684070008291362_2028440787_n.jpg
 
What's that you say, Mr. Government Flunkie Person? The War on Drugs has numerous deleterious effects such as distorting economies, poisoning banking sectors, fueling illicit markets, undermining governments, corrupting government officials, nourishing criminal networks and funding insurgent groups?

Well, that just sounds awful! Maybe we oughta do something about that ...

Sure, sure, we'll get right on that. We had no idea.
 
Leave 'em alone!

Afghan opium kills far, far less people than these suits in DC!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cap
I am confused . The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction ( SIGAR ) , ( created in 2008) is a position held by a guy last I was aware of who came from the GAO . Position is to " detect and prevent waste , fraud and abuse " .
 
I am confused . The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction ( SIGAR ) , ( created in 2008) is a position held by a guy last I was aware of who came from the GAO . Position is to " detect and prevent waste , fraud and abuse " .

John F. Sopko is currently a partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, a position he has held since 2009. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Sopko served as Chief Counsel for Oversight and Investigations for the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. Previously, he was Deputy Director of the Homeland Security Institute from 2005 to 2007, and Minority General Counsel and Chief of Investigations for the U.S. House Select Committee on Homeland Security from 2003 to 2005. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Sopko held a number of roles at the U.S. Department of Commerce, including Deputy Director of the National Technical Information Service, Acting Assistant Secretary and Deputy Assistant Secretary of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement, and Chief Counsel for the Special Matters Unit at the Office of General Counsel.

From 1982 to 1997, Mr. Sopko was Deputy Chief Counsel at the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations and from 1978 to 1982, he was Special Attorney at the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section of the U.S. Department of Justice.

He holds a B.A. in Economics and Sociology from the University of Pennsylvania and a J.D. from Case Western Reserve University School of Law.
http://diplopundit.net/2012/06/04/officially-in-john-f-sopko-from-law-partner-to-sigar/

Oh yes, he's in deep.
 
This is contrary to what I previously unsterstood about the Taliban. I thought the Taliban was against secularism and especially against the growing of narcotics in its country.

Taliban from what I gather is often used synonymously with al CIAda even though they are two distinctly different groups. I am not sure if the Taliban has any "terrorist" intentions, or if it is just a afghan based militant group with its own set of ideals that is fighting to keep control of the areas it occupies.

I may be wrong, but that's how I've understood the Taliban for years now.
 
This is contrary to what I previously unsterstood about the Taliban. I thought the Taliban was against secularism and especially against the growing of narcotics in its country.

Taliban from what I gather is often used synonymously with al CIAda even though they are two distinctly different groups. I am not sure if the Taliban has any "terrorist" intentions, or if it is just a afghan based militant group with its own set of ideals that is fighting to keep control of the areas it occupies.

I may be wrong, but that's how I've understood the Taliban for years now.

Yeah weren't the Taliban actually in the process of outlawing and destroying all the poppy fields in Afghanistan prior to the invasion? I thought that was what I had read. Since the invasion, poppy growth went up by record numbers, even a bigger crop numbers than previously had been known. Now the Taliban is raking in the turrist dough with it? Please, more like they can extend the WoD to Afghanistan now.
 
Back
Top