Adam Kokesh Cancels D.C. March (interview)

not cancelled. Watch the video again, and this time fucking listen.

At 6:55, Derrick explicitly says that the main march, open carry on DC has been cancelled. Adam does not refute that statement and in fact nods his head in assent at that statement. What part are YOU listening to?

The fact that there is so much confusion about this point is ridiculous and speaks volumes about how poorly this is being handled.
 
Last edited:
At 6:55, Derrick explicitly says that the main march, open carry on DC has been cancelled. Adam does not refute that statement. What part are YOU listening to?

The fact that there is so much confusion about this point is ridiculous and speaks volumes about how poorly this is being handled.

start listening...real close..at the 1:15 mark.
 
who's paying you?...Lindsey Graham?

Ummm, no. I just think Adam is a little pussy to cancel the march just because he doesn't want to go back to jail. A nation wide protest isn't going to do shit. You need one big ass wave of people to launch on Washington D.C. That gets attention. Not these piddly little 50 people rallies at individual state capitals.
 
Last edited:
Ummm, no. I just think Adam is a little pussy to cancel the march just because he doesn't want to go back to jail. A nation wide protest isn't going to do shit. You need one big ass wave of people to launch on Washington D.C. That gets attention. Not these piddly little 50 people rallies at individual state capitals.

Nobody is stopping you from leading a march in DC...
 
start listening...real close..at the 1:15 mark.


lol........feel free to go to DC; I suspect you will be the only one. He explains that instead of the original plan of actual civil disobedience with an armed march on DC he is now going to "escalate" it to (mere) protest at each of the state capitols.
 
Ummm, no. I just think Adam is a little pussy to cancel the march just because he doesn't want to go back to jail. A nation wide protest isn't going to do shit. You need one big ass wave of people to launch on Washington D.C. That gets attention. Not these piddly little 50 people rallies at individual state capitals.

I do think Adam is doing more than many others, he is doing more for liberty than I am, that's for sure. That being said I do agree with you, it is TIME for a big move and a bunch of scattered protest reminiscent of occupy will change nothing.
 
Last edited:
I do think Adam is doing more for many, he is doing more for liberty that I am, thats certainly true. That being said I do agree with you, it is TIME for a big move.


The main distinction that I see between what WAS planned and what IS NOW planned is that the former was clearly civil disobedience, an intentional breaking of the law. The latter is merely legal protest and as such will garner far less publicity and will have no effect (the peak response from the public was earlier this year when there was all the talk about proposed legislation and now very few will bother to show up)
 
lol........feel free to go to DC; I suspect you will be the only one. He explains that instead of the original plan of actual civil disobedience with an armed march on DC he is now going to "escalate" it to (mere) protest at each of the state capitols.

capitols also include D.C.
 
As I understand it, the DC march IS cancelled and a new group of marches is planned instead, on each state capitol.

By not clearly saying that the DC march is cancelled, it is possible that some poor sap would show up and wonder where everyone is?

HOWEVER: At least at my state capitol, it is not against the law to carry on the sidewalk around the capitol building, and because it is not illegal, that changes the march from an act of civil disobedience down to a simple protest, which is a major change.

It also makes it look like Adam chickened out. (I was too chicken to go in the first place, so feel free to call me all the names you like for pointing this out)

Absolutely spot on assessement.
 
How is he going to cancel it? He doesn't have the power to stop it now, too late Adam and you think way too much of yourself if you think the march needed you in any way. You might have got it started but you won't stop it from occurring now.
 
How is he going to cancel it? He doesn't have the power to stop it now, too late Adam and you think way too much of yourself if you think the march needed you in any way. You might have got it started but you won't stop it from occurring now.

Umm you clearly have no idea how the internet works.
 
Did you watch the interview? It was really good and gave us a clear answer.

Adam wants to make sure the march is not CENTERED around him, essentially he is trying to include the people and make it less about him.

He thinks he can cancel it, so he obviously thinks it is about him. He is full of it if he thinks it will not happen now. No one needs Adam for any march.
 
I know Adam is full of himself to think he can cancel it now. He isn't going obviously, but that won't stop the march.

The march won't stop but it's been significantly dismantled and thus no longer a threat to the establishment. AKA a failure.
 
Back
Top