According to WSJ, our fate will be "formally" and "offically" sealed on Tuesday -- Liar

[No1butPaul]

According to WSJ, our fate will be "formally" and "offically" sealed on Tuesday -- Liar

Peggy Noonan (WSJ): Mitt Romney's Moment: The GOP nominee explains why he thinks America is at an 'inflection point

"... On Tuesday Texas will put him over the top and make him, formally and officially, the Republican nominee for president." Lots of other crap too ... like how Ronmey says he loves competing in politics because he's not athletic (me: and couldn't beat Ron Paul in a bicycle race or baseball).

How is she allowed to outright lie like this? I'm sure this is how it's going to be after Texas, UNLESS, we have an upset VICTORY IN SOUTH DAKOTA.

We just have to win in SD and I hope Ron Paul will be ready to speak there when we do ... going to bump the MB.

(WSJ Full Article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304707604577424642695167400.html)


Donation Made To: South Dakota for Liberty
Rally URL: https://rally.org/southdakotaforliberty
Amount: $100.00
Made On: Sunday, May 27, 2012

 

[sailingaway]

The AP delegate count they are using gives Ron exactly one delegates in Iowa, as an example, which we all know is nonsense since even Romney's own folks there expect Ron to get 20. EVEN IF Romney wins all of the states Tuesday, he doesn't REALLY have 1144 delegates. The problem is they will use that to say he does, falsely, until they manipulate the CA election results by fake reporting. He is LIKELY to get them, the way we are going, at least on paper, prior to the convention (humans voting being different than paper results). But he won't have them Tuesday regardless of the vote.

BUT, why don't we use the urgency to do a 'VOTE for RON PAUL!! STOP Romney in Texas -- Remember the Alamo!' campaign?

 

[romancito]

And formally unsealed at the Ron Paul Fest 1 day before the RNC.

 

[No1butPaul]

BUT, why don't we use the urgency to do a 'VOTE for RON PAUL!! STOP Romney in Texas -- Remember the Alamo!' campaign?

I think we should, but I also think that sending $ to South Dakota is so important because we know EXACTLY what they are using the money for ... it is going towards a WIN. I think the money is going to do better there than the money I sent in the last money bomb ... I'm not certain about that though, since I don't have any idea what they are doing with the Liberty Bomb money.

 

[airborne373]

Keep in mind the WSJ is a propaganda rag owned by the foreigner Rupert "I send you children to war, but not mine" Murdoch. I know he is a U.S. citizen now, but only so he could bypass ownership laws in media. Rupurt Murdoch is a foreign infiltrator and his minions are Tokyo Rose propagandists.

 

[nobody's_hero]

These people still don't get it. If the Revolution's fate get's sealed, so too does the GOP's.

Or maybe they do get it. I still can't shake the idea that the GOP has been set up to fail. I mean, Romney? Yeah, this was a set up. Stupid GOP fell for it.

 

[tuggy24g]

The AP delegate count they are using gives Ron exactly one delegates in Iowa, as an example, which we all know is nonsense since even Romney's own folks there expect Ron to get 20. EVEN IF Romney wins all of the states Tuesday, he doesn't REALLY have 1144 delegates. The problem is they will use that to say he does, falsely, until they manipulate the CA election results by fake reporting. He is LIKELY to get them, the way we are going, at least on paper, prior to the convention (humans voting being different than paper results). But he won't have them Tuesday regardless of the vote.

BUT, why don't we use the urgency to do a 'VOTE for RON PAUL!! STOP Romney in Texas -- Remember the Alamo!' campaign?

You are correct. Also like we all know that not all states end up the way the voting turns out. Look at Pennsylvania or even Nevada for example. Ron Paul did not win the state, but yet he won most delegates in Nevada coming in third. The vote was only for a preferred vote on president. Then you look at PA and Romney did not get any delegates out of the 72 he supposedly won. Romney actually won as of right now zero since none of them are actually bound to a candidate. All the media does as you said is go by how the voting turned out. They do not go by true facts that the delegates are voted on later on and they really determine who wins the state like Maine.

 

[Staupostek]

When they continually report that Romney has all the delegates and Paul has very few, they set up the storyline that if Paul gets a lot of delegate votes at the convention, there is something wrong with the count/process/party in people's minds. Then they can paint Paul as stealing the votes. And if, by some miracle, he gets the nomination, they can paint him as illegitimate. It is like telling a lie so often that when the truth comes out nobody believes it. And if it is something that they can't deny, they still have in the back of their minds that something isn't quite right with that truth.