A Worrisome Pledge to Substantially Increase US ‘Defense’ Spending

PAF

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
13,559
by Adam Dick
Jun 26, 2025


Big news out of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) meeting this week is member governments agreeing to a declaration stating they each “commit to invest 5 percent of GDP annually on core defence requirements as well as defence-and security-related spending by 2035 to ensure our individual and collective obligations.”

“Defence” is used, largely outside America, as an alternative spelling of “defense.”

Most the focus in media coverage of this development is on the increased spending that will be required to meet this goal by nations other than the US that was the primary pusher of the move. But, it should also be noted that the US government will have to direct much more spending to “defense” to meet the goal as well.

A NATO chart of member governments’ spending levels as of 2024 puts the US at 3.4 percent of GDP (gross domestic product) on this type of spending. That means meeting the goal would require that such spending gobble up roughly half again as much of GDP within the next ten years.

In April, I wrote about how it would be disastrous if the US government achieved this increased spending goal that was then being promoted by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. You can read that post here.



 
We don't have to and won't meet the goal, we already carry all the parasites at much lower levels.

And the parasites will not meet the goal and Trump will leave NATO.
 
We don't have to and won't meet the goal, we already carry all the parasites at much lower levels.

And the parasites will not meet the goal and Trump will leave NATO.

How's your prediction rate lately, Ms. Cleo?
 
How's your prediction rate lately, Ms. Cleo?

As terrible as ever.

Absolute nonsense, he campaigned on the opposite and he's keeping us out of this.
By sending three aircraft carriers in. No, it's past the point where you can issue denials. Let's have the usual excuses. How many dimensions of chess is this?
LOL

He's sending them to protect our people in the region, to ensure Iran doesn't get any stupid ideas.
They will not be joining in unless Iran attacks us first.
 
NATO should not be.

It's mission dried up over thirty years ago.

Europe is being invaded as we speak, not by Soviet Red Army hordes, but by hordes of migrant invaders.

Dissolve it.
 
NATO should not be.

It's mission dried up over thirty years ago.

Europe is being invaded as we speak, not by Soviet Red Army hordes, but by hordes of migrant invaders.

Dissolve it.
Good news, Europe is already slowly dissolving into the ocean.
 
Back
Top