A New Digital Cash System Was Just Unveiled At A Secret Meeting For Bankers In New York

DamianTV

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2007
Messages
20,677
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/...d-at-a-secret-meeting-for-bankers-in-new-york

Secret-Public-Domain-460x307.jpg


Last month, a “secret meeting” that involved more than 100 executives from some of the biggest financial institutions in the United States was held in New York City. During this “secret meeting“, a company known as “Chain” unveiled a technology that transforms U.S. dollars into “pure digital assets”. Reportedly, there were representatives from Nasdaq, Citigroup, Visa, Fidelity, Fiserv and Pfizer in the room, and Chain also claims to be partnering with Capital One, State Street, and First Data. This “revolutionary” technology is intended to completely change the way that we use money, and it would represent a major step toward a cashless society. But if this new digital cash system is going to be so good for society, why was it unveiled during a secret meeting for Wall Street bankers? Is there something more going on here than we are being told?

None of us probably would have ever heard about this secret meeting if it was not for a report in Bloomberg. The following comes from their article entitled “Inside the Secret Meeting Where Wall Street Tested Digital Cash“…

On a recent Monday in April, more than 100 executives from some of the world’s largest financial institutions gathered for a private meeting at the Times Square office of Nasdaq Inc. They weren’t there to just talk about blockchain, the new technology some predict will transform finance, but to build and experiment with the software.

By the end of the day, they had seen something revolutionary: U.S. dollars transformed into pure digital assets, able to be used to execute and settle a trade instantly. That’s the promise of a blockchain, where the cumbersome and error-prone system that takes days to move money across town or around the world is replaced with almost instant certainty.


...

(Full article on link)

Without financial privacy, the Right to interact with others is converted into a Permission, and that Permission is very close to being denied entirely.
 
Who secures their private blockchain? What a joke. Hahaha
 
Last edited:
Offhand it sounds like Ripple, digital certs that can be used to transmit any sort of security.
 
Relevant reading - http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...-Declaration&p=6105650&viewfull=1#post6105650 (the whole thread)

I have spent a great deal of time gathering relevant goings-on with regard to what we are seeing evolve in terms of domestic and international financial clearing models and it's infrastructure and polic(ies) in the linked thread for the purpose of easy research for others. As well, steps that we should expect from the west in defense of what is evolving abroad. I've neglected the thread as of late given the lack of interest around here but we're still seeing some monumental things happening on that front. I just never gets discussed in western media or in circles where self proclaimed economic "experts" (:rolleyes:) in the west congregate.

Good post, Damian. Timely, too.
 
Last edited:
But these transactions would have to be global? Chinese, Russians, Saudis, Germans, Brits, Israelis, all playing nice with digital assets...hard to believe.
 
90% of all money is already digital. Banks are looking at BlockChain as a way to track and verify transactions.
 
Without financial privacy, the Right to interact with others is converted into a Permission, and that Permission is very close to being denied entirely.

Thanks for the OP - the future is coming fast.

Financial overhaul needed, but honest money may not be "their" priority.
 
Another move that's sooooo secret that it's just been revealed. :rolleyes:

SDR = One World legal tender.

Who wants to bear the burden of all that paper and ink when taking over global banking. We'll just trade our paper for digits, get chipped and…

Zippy can retire.
 
SDRs can't become the One World Currency. That is because it is made up of other currencies- the Euro, the dollar, the GB pound, the Yen and the Yuan (starting in October). To make more SDRs they need more of all of these (the total value of all the SDRs in the world is about $300 billion) so to replace the dollar and Euro with SDRs they need more dollars and Euros. If dollars and Euros disappear, so do the SDRs.

http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/sdr.htm

The SDR is neither a currency, nor a claim on the IMF. Rather, it is a potential claim on the freely usable currencies of IMF members. Holders of SDRs can obtain these currencies in exchange for their SDRs in two ways: first, through the arrangement of voluntary exchanges between members; and second, by the IMF designating members with strong external positions to purchase SDRs from members with weak external positions. In addition to its role as a supplementary reserve asset, the SDR serves as the unit of account of the IMF and some other international organizations.
 
Last edited:
SDRs can't become the One World Currency. That is because it is made up of other currencies- the Euro, the dollar, the GB pound, the Yen and the Yuan (starting in October). To make more SDRs they need more of all of these (the total value of all the SDRs in the world is about $300 billion) so to replace the dollar and Euro with SDRs they need more dollars and Euros. If dollars and Euros disappear, so do the SDRs.

http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/sdr.htm

Thanks for the spokesperson's version, like we needed that.

So, what happens when those currencies in the basket crash and burn (seen those countries' CBs balance sheets lately)?

SDR, chump.
 
Thanks for the spokesperson's version, like we needed that.

So, what happens when those currencies in the basket crash and burn (seen those countries' CBs balance sheets lately)?

SDR, chump.

Not only that but the "they need more of all of these" line is laughable since the whole point is to digitize currency where it can be totally controlled with the press of buttons on a computer. Need more? *click* *type* *click* DONE
 
Thanks for the spokesperson's version, like we needed that.

So, what happens when those currencies in the basket crash and burn (seen those countries' CBs balance sheets lately)?

SDR, chump.

Consider the apple pie. An apple pie is made mostly up of apples and some other stuff. The SDR is made up mostly of US dollars and some other stuff (a few other currencies- the dollar is about 42% of it). Let's say we want to replace apples with apple pie- just like replacing the dollar with SDRs. We cut down all of the apples trees and get rid of all them so there are no more apples. But now we can't make any apple pie since there are no more apples so we can't replace the apples with apple pie since we can't make apple pie without the apples.

If, as you say, the dollar and Euro and the other currencies collapse then yes, they will need to be replaced with something. It just won't be SDRs because they too will cease to exist. New Dollars perhaps?
 
Last edited:
Consider the apple pie. An apple pie is made mostly up of apples and some other stuff. The SDR is made up mostly of US dollars and some other stuff (a few other currencies- the dollar is about 42% of it). Let's say we want to replace apples with apple pie- just like replacing the dollar with SDRs. We cut down all of the apples trees and get rid of all them so there are no more apples. But now we can't make any apple pie since there are no more apples so we can't replace the apples with apple pie since we can't make apple pie without the apples.

If, as you say, the dollar and Euro and the other currencies collapse then yes, they will need to be replaced with something. It just won't be SDRs because they too will cease to exist. New Dollars perhaps?


Zip, you never did answer my question. This post looks like it was written by the other guy on the ZippyJuan account. Are you in Southern California or England?
 
Without financial privacy, the Right to interact with others is converted into a Permission, and that Permission is very close to being denied entirely.

Fixed that fer'ye.

I remember once seeing on one of those horrid shows like 60 Minutes or 20/20, some talking head from "government" boasting that they could take cash away from "us" any time they wanted. That was at least 25 years ago. They've been heading slowly in that direction the entire time. One wonders how Theye feel about bitcoin.
 
Back
Top