A New Currency System for the World

Zoomer

Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
35
Today I wrote this article, encapsulating my idea for a new currency system of the world, and wanted to share it specifically with the Liberty Forest community; open minded and ready for action.

While the banking cartels and their political pawns are busy planning the world's next currency system - I believe that we, as advocates of liberty & freedom, have a responsibility to plan a new currency system of our own. One that is based on real value. That constitutes open banking. And leverages technology.

Any dollar, pound, or euro is simply a unit for storing value. The problem of course, is that each of these units contain only imaginary value - because they, by themselves, are an intangible asset. The money is just paper or common metal at best.

Of course, on the contrary - gold is a rare commodity. A thing of beauty on it's own. And thus, a gold coin is a more logical unit of value. One that has already served the needs of mankind for over 3,000 years.

But what if there was another way? Another way to store value. One that features the advantages of both a digital currency and one that is backed by physical gold. A modern evolution of both; created for the future.


A new model for a new era

More than a 'currency' by itself, what we need is an entire new model. One that is designed to the highest level of simplified perfection. One that creates prosperity, distributes wealth, and encourages saving. Impossible to manipulate, control, or govern.

The model would prevent the inherit problems of today's currency: namely the ability for a centralized power to control the supply via inflation & deflation. Other banking abuses such as fractional reserve lending would be eliminated.

The new currency system must also be flexible: so it can be easily and instantly exchanged. Transcending borders. Connecting everyone. Enabling for a fast implementation and worldwide adoption.

Just as standardized coinage, a process that started as far back as 700 BC, was a revolutionary monetary innovation: our new currency model we create today must be an innovation that perseveres the ages.

The most significant innovation of our time - has been the inception and tremendously rapid development of the internet. It is certainly a communications platform that can facilitate transactions. And it also holds the key to our new world money system.


Open Source Currency

Among the benefits that the internet has helped modern day civilization achieve, is a philosophy that has emerged around a common goal for creating something better; together. "Open source" is a concept in whereby the source code of a given system is viewable to all. Countless open source projects have been started, and are fueled by, communities of experts willing to share their knowledge for the greater good; to make the system better. If this open source philosophy can be applied to a new currency as it has been applied to software - we will be on the right track to developing a system that can withstand, perpetuate, and succeed throughout the ages.

Indeed, today even a small team of programmers can create a secure, online banking system. No longer do we need massive institutions for holding our wealth. We have learned from the past: entrusting wealth in the hands of government (and quasi government) only leads to corruption, monopolies, and ultimately: failure. It is time we pass this great responsibility from government to an open source community - where corruption has nowhere to hide.

And indeed, an open source community is, in my mind, the only entity capable of bringing forward a monetary revolution.


The First Prototype

So if we bring together our bright minds in an open source community with the objective of creating a new model of currency for the world: just what might be created? What would it look like? How would we trade it?

Thousands of years of monetary evolution needs not be discarded. Rather, we simply need to adopt what works and drop what doesn't. The key is aggregated improvement fueled by new ideas.

The first idea is this: a digital coin.

Throughout the ages, coins have proved to be an everlasting store of value. Ranging from gold to copper - the concept remains in use to this day, even after thousands of years since the practice first began. And it is this level of of milestone innovation that our new currency system must achieve. A concept that can live for a thousand years before requiring another radical step in evolution. And indeed, the digital coin may be our next step.

Much like a physical coin is stamped with a mark of authority, a digital coin could be stamped with an encrypted code; used to identify it's authenticity.

The open source community would be responsible for developing the platform and servers required to generate, process, and authenticate the codes in order to facilitate the world's transactions. With the load balanced across a network of decentralized servers.

On the other side; when there is no active web connection - you can store your data on new type of physical coin. One that has a solid state hard drive built into it - used to store it's unique code. Allowing you to transfer wealth to and from your physical coins in the same way you would transfer data on an SD card.



Today, data is already a commodity. Open up your digital camera. Perhaps you have a 2 GB card inside. In your laptop, perhaps 100 GB. Desktop drives are now reaching upwards of 2000 GB. As you know, the higher capacity a hard drive, the higher it's value. And much like currencies, the value changes over time. In 1995, a single gigabyte cost over $800.

In our new currency model of the digital coin the face value could be measured in gigabytes, much like an SD card. Having a higher capacity "coin" means you can hold a higher unit of wealth; or a more highly encrypted code.

Want to buy a new TV? That will be 10,000 Gigabytes please.

At any rate, it's exciting to follow the development of technology. And we can peg our currency to technological innovation - safeguarded by an open source community - then we might just achieve the harmony needed to create a new currency system for the world.

Of course, we won't know for sure unless someone builds the first prototype.


http://www.libertyplanet.com/news/1005/new-currency-world

Your feedback is welcomed.
 
I was going to ask the same question...also, who has the power to 'create' it? I know you said 'open source', but that seems very vague and not truly tied to anything of actual value.
 
Last edited:
The actual creation of the currency itself is still in conceptual stage. I think that is a big part of the challenge in creating a system such as this.

In the conclusion I briefly eluded to having the value of the currency pegged to technological innovation - such as the amount of hard disk storage. The specifics of how the coins are initially created and distributed would be the responsibility for the project founders & the open source community to establish.

Someone has already built the first prototype. bitcoin.org

This is really pleasing to see. I was not aware of this project, thank-you. The fact that there is already an open source digital currency system in place validates the concept.

This currency system generates coins based on CPU cycles, or the amount that you contribute to the decentralized node network. It's a great idea and a good start.
 
This is really pleasing to see. I was not aware of this project, thank-you. The fact that there is already an open source digital currency system in place validates the concept.

This currency system generates coins based on CPU cycles, or the amount that you contribute to the decentralized node network. It's a great idea and a good start.

I don't think it's ready for the general public, but it's gaining momentum with computer and e-currency geeks. I encourage you to join the forum and discussion over there. We need more dedicated bloggers promoting it.
 
So if I want to purchase say a TV the system will wipe out my hard drive to destroy the bytes I have?

Open source of creating money would also be open to it being freely manipulated. Consider information on Wikipedia.
 
So if I want to purchase say a TV the system will wipe out my hard drive to destroy the bytes I have?

Open source of creating money would also be open to it being freely manipulated. Consider information on Wikipedia.

I'd rather take my chances with Wikipedia than a traditional encyclopedia. The same goes for a currency. I'd prefer an open source currency that is verified by everyone, than one which is controlled by an elite few.

The algorithm in Bitcoin creates a very long and unique series of bits. These bits must be verified by everyone on the network.
 
Bitcoin is not really backed by anything is it? If something doesn't have value by itself, it suffers the same problems of fiat currency.

Money facilitates trade, that's the only reason for it. So I don't have to pay rent with 1.7 refrigerators or whatever. But a certain weight of metal like a gold or silver coin that people value works well. It can also be pretty standard: 1oz is 1oz.

Gold by itself as a currency could have problems. 'The Gold Standard'. Ron Paul instead favors competing currencies. Let people trade what they want! We see small communities trying various local currency models to protect local economy, here's just one example:

YouTube - This Town Prints Its Own Money!

But this idea that there should be one thing we trade with is weird. Let lots of people try different stuff and let the creme rise to the top: competing currencies.
 
Bitcoin is not really backed by anything is it? If something doesn't have value by itself, it suffers the same problems of fiat currency.

Money facilitates trade, that's the only reason for it. So I don't have to pay rent with 1.7 refrigerators or whatever. But a certain weight of metal like a gold or silver coin that people value works well. It can also be pretty standard: 1oz is 1oz.

Gold by itself as a currency could have problems. 'The Gold Standard'. Ron Paul instead favors competing currencies. Let people trade what they want! We see small communities trying various local currency models to protect local economy, here's just one example:

But this idea that there should be one thing we trade with is weird. Let lots of people try different stuff and let the creme rise to the top: competing currencies.

It seems any commodity which is rare and easy to trade has the potential to be a currency. Personally, I think intrinsic value is bogus. No material thing has intrinsic value. Not even gold.

Gold has value because people want it to have value. If people want Bitcoin to have value, it will have value. If people want a local currency to have value, it will have value.
 
Last edited:
It seems any commodity which is rare and easy to trade has the potential to be a currency. Personally, I think intrinsic value is bogus. No material thing has intrinsic value. Not even gold.

Gold has value because people want it to have value. If people want Bitcoin to have value, it will have value. If people want a local currency to have value, it will have value.

True, but some currencies will be more stable than others. Coupons are worth nothing when the product isn't available anymore.

I think it is safe to assume that no matter what happens to the economy, gold and silver will for at least some time retain value to people who have no first hand use for it but to trade it to someone else who has faith it is tradeable.

There is nothing which has value, outside utility or tradeability, to all people. But there are certain things which have widespread value and can be expected to sustain value.

Competing currencies would find out very quickly what kinds of money work best.
 
True, but some currencies will be more stable than others. Coupons are worth nothing when the product isn't available anymore.

I think it is safe to assume that no matter what happens to the economy, gold and silver will for at least some time retain value to people who have no first hand use for it but to trade it to someone else who has faith it is tradeable.

There is nothing which has value, outside utility or tradeability, to all people. But there are certain things which have widespread value and can be expected to sustain value.

Competing currencies would find out very quickly what kinds of money work best.

I agree completely. I just get frustrated when people talk about intrinsic value like it's a mystic force. Gold and Silver are perfect commodities for use as a currency. They are both scarce, last forever, and relatively easy to trade once minted. That's why people gave them value +6000 years ago, why they continue today, and why they will probably continue in the foreseeable future. But, in an electronic age, they do have drawbacks. An open source electronic currency, which can compete with the bank wire cartel, is necessary, if we ever hope to defeat these people.
 
I've thought about this from time to time. The currency itself isn't the end purpose of engaging in trade. Currency is used to purchase items that a person values. A person needs to actually produce something of value before they can trade with someone else. Or else they can borrow and promise future production to buy something today.

I could cut wood, have a pile of firewood that exceeds my needs, and offer the extra to the highest bidder. People with an excess of onions or shirts or whatever will offer their products to the highest bidder. Of course it will get more complicated than that.

This new digital currency could be the medium which is used to make these trades.

A related concept that might tie into this is the honor system, like feedback ratings on eBay. You make your trades, everyone gets to enter their feedback on the transaction, and eventually the less than honorable people will be weeded out, or be required to pay higher prices for the risk of doing business. Kind of like your credit rating, too.
 
Everyone.

Ok going back and reading the rest of your post here is my comment. Keep in mind this topic has been debated on this forum several times as well as other places such as Mises, etc. It has been extensively kicked around by some of the best and brightest minds who advocate free markets. Not taking anything away from you just putting this thread in context.

If people can't inspect and authenticate something for themselves there is no inherent trust. Digital encryption is not something that builds inherent trust. To make a claim of secure with regards to anything is too bold for reality.

There is already an open source standard for gold and silver coin emerging in the market:

http://www.opencurrency.com/currencies/

Why reinvent the wheel? Improve upon an existing one already working.
 
Back
Top