A Message to the Liberty Movement

[Christopher A. Brown]

Yes, that's what RPF is. Chocked full of my disciples.

You do realize that this is a bulletin board and not an organization right? I mean, it's objectively just a shared document that multiple anonymous people can edit. Are you aware of ANYONE here being a member of anything? I see a few "Stand With Rand" logos attached to avatars but other than that not much in the way of organization.

I didn't say any were your disciples.

Of course any organization could choose to send people here to act covertly in the joint misrepresentation of the reality of the political environment we Americans have to act in, do you realize that? Then no one would see overt organization.

Here is proof of at least two such organizations. The first appears as a potential from government.

http://www.salon.com/2010/01/15/sunstein_2/

The second as an organization which is a branch of a foreign government.

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

I would expect the first to be a cooperative operation cooperating with secret government agendas from corporate or NWO facilities, that were somewhat directed by the interests of the second, by intelligence agencies of a foreign government.

There is more.

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/snowden_cyber_offensive2_nbc_document.pdf

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE95K0ZV20130621?irpc=932
For decades, the NSA and GCHQ have worked as close partners, sharing intelligence under an arrangement known as the UKUSA agreement. They also collaborate with eavesdropping agencies in Canada, Australia and New Zealand under an arrangement known as the "Five Eyes" alliance.

Accordingly, I see psychologically organized interactions that are very much covert and reciprocal towards misleading. Distraction with preoccupation of sensation rather than functional political discourse.

In this environment the only logical action is unified focus upon natural law constitutional principle. That is because it is logically the opposite of the agenda of the covertly organized infiltrations. Those infiltrations seek to dismantle the unity inherent to the American way of thinking.

Sure, partisanship has become a standard in American politics, but the underlying absolute in idealism is the constitution. In the covert infiltration we can see a large impetus of dwell upon division based in partisan thinking as an effort to model and mislead into the past dysfunctionality which brought us to where we are.

However, constitutional intent is so removed that it stands completely separate in our individual psychologies within natural law. Inherent to that for millennia is that humans have unified on every level to survive.

That unity is always product of the purpose of communication. The nature of preparedness dictates openness to accommodate the unforeseen, OR the obscured. In the case of tyrannical conspiracy, the true nature of our difficulty, our challenge is always obscured.

This dictates FREEDOM OF SPEECH in order to actually serve the purpose of functional unity. At any moment, one of us may actually become aware of the true problem and alert the others, whereupon immediate unity is possible. Depending of course upon how obvious the threat is.

We have a curious situation here. Where the above logic is obscured by a vast array of problems kept artificially visible blocking the very purpose of free speech, abridging it. This the true and underlying threat of the internet forum.